The Cleveland Browns groundskeeper hanged himself. Do we need rope control?

The Cleveland Browns groundskeeper hanged himself. Do we need rope control?

On the contrary, good sir, I think that when someone makes national news by having a gun without the mental faculties one should have in order to procure a gun, it's as good a time as any to talk about guns.

Do you blame him?

Did he hang the mother of his child too?

The Cleveland Browns groundskeeper hanged himself. Do we need rope control?

Did he hang the mother of his child too?

If he had would you be in favor of controlling rope?

Keep the guns away from the crazy. Or the other ways around. Maybe we need to get rid of fast food before it kills Whitlock.

Something sure is wrong. Sheesh.

I'll assume your non-answer means you see the difference between the two.

Come on now. Benoit only drugged, strangled, and gave the Crippler Crossface to one kid.

No. People are murdered in various ways all the time. A gun is simple a tool, like a rope or a knife or a jackhandle. If you want to argue that as opposed to those other tools, the sole purpose of a handgun is killing, fine. But I don't think it's a great idea to promote rules that will ultimately result in only officials of government, i.e. the very wealthy, having firepower. But America is well on its way to becoming a plutocratic state. May as well disarm the proletariat now.

No. People are murdered in various ways all the time. A gun is simple a tool, like a rope or a knife or a jackhandle. If you want to argue that as opposed to those other tools, the sole purpose of a handgun is killing, fine. But I don't think it's a great idea to promote rules that will ultimately result in only officials of government, i.e. the very wealthy, having firepower. But America is well on its way to becoming a plutocratic state. May as well disarm the proletariat now.

Evidently I was mistaken.
You clearly do not see the difference between a guy hanging himself in a tool shed and a guy that shoots his GF before shooting himself.
My bad.

I'm not killing my NIU buzz on this.

Really? Why do you think the founding father SPECIFICALLY included a right to bear arms in the Bill of Rights. The right to bear arms is designed to protect the people from an overreaching government. It goes hand in hand with all our other freedoms which are slowly being curtailed each day.

I'm not killing my NIU buzz on this.

[
There goes spanky, spank, spank, spanking his way through another thread.

Flying headbutt

actually, that sentiment goes to all of you who for whatever reason still want to have nitpicky gun arguments that will most likely morph into a .GIF party anyway.

night!