| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Brothers in law https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=76996 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Brothers in law |
Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brother in laws |
CGS is not going to approve of this topic. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Racist... |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
good dolphin wrote: Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said Greg Blache |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 9:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Hawg Ass wrote: This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. Is Spmack a lawyer or something? |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. Is Spmack a lawyer or something? No, that I recall. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. Is Spmack a lawyer or something? No, that I recall. If he is, I hope he's a prosecutor. Because I played him at Hoops 3 and he can't defend for shit. |
|
| Author: | Hawg Ass [ Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. Is Spmack a lawyer or something? No, that I recall. If he is, I hope he's a prosecutor. Because I played him at Hoops 3 and he can't defend for shit. 
|
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Got an unimpeded run into your (previously full) liquor cabinets again eh? |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Tue Feb 12, 2013 3:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: SomeGuy wrote: Hawg Ass wrote: This is not bringing SPmack back to the board. Is Spmack a lawyer or something? No, that I recall. If he is, I hope he's a prosecutor. Because I played him at Hoops 3 and he can't defend for shit. Fuck yeah, Dr. Ken got it! |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: good dolphin wrote: Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said Greg Blache Bingo |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sat Feb 16, 2013 7:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
bigfan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: good dolphin wrote: Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said Greg Blache Bingo That's why I'm the reigning CSFMB Sports Trivia Champion. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Feb 16, 2013 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: bigfan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: good dolphin wrote: Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said Greg Blache Bingo That's why I'm the reigning CSFMB Sports Trivia Champion. 
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: bigfan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: good dolphin wrote: Maybe dusty wasn't full of shit about everything he said Greg Blache Bingo That's why I'm the reigning CSFMB Sports Trivia Champion. Who was the last Chicago Cub to go to bat with out a helmet? |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sat Feb 16, 2013 10:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
jimmypasta wrote: Who was the last Chicago Cub to go to bat with out a helmet? I'm not here for jimmypasta's amusement. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:04 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: jimmypasta wrote: Who was the last Chicago Cub to go to bat with out a helmet? I'm not here for jimmypasta's amusement. I think you are since I'm usually laughing at most of your humorous comments. You are a funny guy. (Answer BTW: Al Spangler) |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
I would have said Carmen Fanzone. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
jimmypasta wrote: Who was the last Chicago Cub to go to bat with out a helmet? Adam Greenberg
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Frank Coztansa wrote: jimmypasta wrote: Who was the last Chicago Cub to go to bat with out a helmet? Adam Greenberg
|
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Feb 17, 2013 12:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brothers in law |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I would have said Carmen Fanzone. I remember when he did the National Anthem on his horn,not much else. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|