Bagels wrote:
badrogue17 wrote:
I guess they couldve done worse and went with Wild instead.
or cowboy joe...
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Kim and Kanye https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=79996 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Kim and Kanye |
To nobody's surprise they fucked up the babies name and are setting the stage for a life of ridicule. Ladies and gentlemen, we give you North West. I guess they couldve done worse and went with Wild instead. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
badrogue17 wrote: I guess they couldve done worse and went with Wild instead. or cowboy joe... |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Im starting to go to the other side of this baby name thing. Who cares? Let em name their kids whatever they want. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:08 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Bagels wrote: badrogue17 wrote: I guess they couldve done worse and went with Wild instead. or cowboy joe...
|
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
rogers park bryan wrote: Im starting to go to the other side of this baby name thing. Who cares? Let em name their kids whatever they want. Yeah I guess the her name is going to pale in comparison to what she's going to get when the other kids at school find out the only reason her mom is famous is because she let herself be taped fucking some dude and it was distributed throughout the world. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Who? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Bagels wrote: badrogue17 wrote: I guess they couldve done worse and went with Wild instead. or cowboy joe...
|
|
| Author: | Brick [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
badrogue17 wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Im starting to go to the other side of this baby name thing. Who cares? Let em name their kids whatever they want. Yeah I guess the her name is going to pale in comparison to what she's going to get when the other kids at school find out the only reason her mom is famous is because she let herself be taped fucking some dude and it was distributed throughout the world. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Should have named her Adam |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Maybe she'll use her biological father's last name. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Maybe she'll use her biological father's last name. JORR... |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 11:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Kim did her kid a favor -- this name sets up perfectly for a plethora of porn movies. She will be a force to reckon with when her sex tapes become legal. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Considering who we are talking about I thought their choice of names was rather tame. I would have expected more outrageous. |
|
| Author: | sinicalypse [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
I would totally rock a vintage Mike North's DONTFADEME.COM shirt. I think it'd even manage to outdo camps' trusty bearly legal shirt @ a remote. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
They aren't married. Wouldn't the baby be North Kardassian? |
|
| Author: | badrogue17 [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 1:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Gloopan Kuratz wrote: They aren't married. Wouldn't the baby be North Kardassian? Still takes fathers name I think . Be that Kanye West or whomever subbed for him. Whats that Ray J dudes last name? |
|
| Author: | Big Chicagoan [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 2:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
badrogue17 wrote: Gloopan Kuratz wrote: They aren't married. Wouldn't the baby be North Kardassian? Still takes fathers name I think . Be that Kanye West or whomever subbed for him. Whats that Ray J dudes last name? Moesha. Saw online people are now referring to Kim's vag as the northwest passage. Hilarious. Such a whore. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 5:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Maybe she'll use her biological father's last name. North Camps? |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Konsidering the fact they've already got Kim, Khloe, Kourtney & Kendall in that family, let alone mom Kris, you'd think they'd keep it in the family by naming her with the letter "K", not after a direction or a defunct U.S. airline. See what I did there? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 9:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Your Baby's Name Is Probably Stupider Than "North West" TOM SCOCCA Today 2:59pmg 58,814 Oh, not you. Your baby's name is great! But you know who I'm talking about. (You.) (Just kidding.) (Wow, that person picked a stupid baby name.) But Kanye West and Kim Kardashian's baby, "North," as in "North West"—that's decent. Not bad at all, under the circumstances. And baby names are nothing but circumstances, which is why everybody else's baby names are so terrible and worth making fun of. Other people aren't you, and when they name their babies, they are gauche enough to demonstrate that fact. And you certainly aren't Kanye West or Kim Kardashian (unless you are, in which case: Mazel tov!). So there are lots and lots of things that the West-Kardashian family does that you would not do, yourself, and when you contemplate the vast set of those things, their naming their daughter "North West" seems pretty admirable and restrained. Being named North West is probably not going to be one of the 200 most traumatic or weird or challenging things about this child's life, as it unfolds. But even if we pretend the West-Kardashians are normal Americans: have you seen what normal Americans are naming their daughters? The top 50 baby girls' names of 2012 included Madison, Addison, Avery, Aubrey, Harper, Brooklyn, Hailey, Kaylee, Nevaeh, Taylor, and Riley. Every one of those is much worse than "North." Do you have to be reminded that if you choose to name your daughter "Madison," you are literally naming her after a dumb joke in a movie about a mermaid? Evidently you do have to be reminded, because you keep on doing it. Soon the lowest-common-denominator urges behind "Nevaeh" and "Brooklyn" will converge and today's children's children will be named "Nylkoorb." Celebrities, meanwhile, go ahead and name their children "Apple" and "Rumer" and "Moxie CrimeFighter," because they know it just doesn't matter. What's wrong with "North," next to all this awfulness? It's crisp and simple. People seem to be trying to complain that it's not a girl's name—as if they're somehow afraid that Kim Kardashian's daughter is going to grow up deprived of cues about how gender roles are enacted in contemporary society. Again, check those top names: Avery, Aubrey, Taylor, Riley. A girl's name is a name you give a girl, even if it's supposed to be a boy's name ("Aubrey" outranks "Audrey" nowadays). People figure it out. The Internet had previously concluded that this baby was going to be named "Kaidence," which would have been truly atrocious, and which would have attached her to the Kardashian family tradition of treating daughters as objects for monogramming, like shirt cuffs. "Khloe" and "Kourtney" are inexcusable. Surrounded by bad precedent, little North came out lucky. But her last name is "West"! That's not a problem. Of all the questionable impulses that guide people to name their children—hick aspiration ("Savannah"), ersatz traditionalism ("Isabella"), cautiousness ("Emily"), ersatz traditionalism plus cautiousness ("Sophia")—the desire to make a dumb little pun is relatively harmless. The West-Kardashian baby falls within an old and charmingly square tradition of goofy names. I went to college with a "Caraway Seed" and a roommate whose middle and last names were "Peter Pan." If Armand Hammer and Ima Hogg could handle it, North West can too. Really, she should be immune to the pun. A jokey name is only a burden for otherwise anonymous civilians. No DMV clerk is ever going to say, "Haha, wait, what was that?" The DMV clerk will say "Ohmygod, it's North West!" Assuming her personal assistant doesn't pick up her learner's permit for her. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
My twin girls will be named East and West. I'd be more pissed about being named after the worst movie ever. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Fri Jun 21, 2013 10:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
I know someone who named their daughters Addison & Brooklyn.
|
|
| Author: | newper [ Sat Jun 22, 2013 12:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
I heard that Hawk named his new basset hound Wegner. |
|
| Author: | bosco [ Sat Jun 22, 2013 2:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
Big Chicagoan wrote: Kim did her kid a favor -- this name sets up perfectly for a plethora of porn movies. She will be a force to reckon with when her sex tapes become legal. you're a douche.. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sat Jun 22, 2013 10:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Kim and Kanye |
I was at a customers house a couple weeks ago and saw the family pictures while working. The girls names were April, May and June and the boys name was Jason. I was like, Jason? Yeah. Its JASON. July, August, September, October, November. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|