Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Bryan Fischer/ AFA https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=80089 |
Page 1 of 7 |
Author: | Northside_Dan [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Bryan Fischer @BryanJFischer 7m The DOMA ruling has now made the normalization of polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality inevitable. Matter of time. Still a long ways to go it seems. Scary to think that this guy is probably not alone with this thought. The anti gay marriage people make no sense. If it's really about religion, then the government shouldn't be involved in it whatsoever. If it's YOUR belief that YOUR God will smite these terrible gays, then be confident in that belief that they are all going to hell or whatever the fuck it is your believe. It doesn't affect you whatsoever. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Someone needs to explain the ruling to him. If STATES legalize polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality, then the Feds can't do anything about it. I don't see any state permitting legal marriage of humans to horses th....oh wait |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Northside_Dan wrote: Bryan Fischer @BryanJFischer 7m The DOMA ruling has now made the normalization of polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality inevitable. Matter of time. Still a long ways to go it seems. Scary to think that this guy is probably not alone with this thought. The anti gay marriage people make no sense. If it's really about religion, then the government shouldn't be involved in it whatsoever. If it's YOUR belief that YOUR God will smite these terrible gays, then be confident in that belief that they are all going to hell or whatever the fuck it is your believe. It doesn't affect you whatsoever. So if someone has no choice in determining their sexual preference, does that possibly mean that a pedophile has no choice either? And if so, why is the law currently discriminating against them? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Northside_Dan wrote: Bryan Fischer @BryanJFischer 7m The DOMA ruling has now made the normalization of polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality inevitable. Matter of time. Still a long ways to go it seems. Scary to think that this guy is probably not alone with this thought. The anti gay marriage people make no sense. If it's really about religion, then the government shouldn't be involved in it whatsoever. If it's YOUR belief that YOUR God will smite these terrible gays, then be confident in that belief that they are all going to hell or whatever the fuck it is your believe. It doesn't affect you whatsoever. So if someone has no choice in determining their sexual preference, does that possibly mean that a pedophile has no choice either? And if so, why is the law currently discriminating against them? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:15 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Polygamy is next |
Author: | pittmike [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
I honestly do think that the polygamist groups out west will in fact win under these same arguments. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Can't say that I agree with the pedo/bestiality comparison but I think that polygamists probably have a decent case to make in the wake of the ruling. edit: perhaps I should read the comments prior to mine before posting... |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
pittmike wrote: I honestly do think that the polygamist groups out west will in fact win under these same arguments. I agree. |
Author: | leashyourkids [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Seacrest wrote: Northside_Dan wrote: Bryan Fischer @BryanJFischer 7m The DOMA ruling has now made the normalization of polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality inevitable. Matter of time. Still a long ways to go it seems. Scary to think that this guy is probably not alone with this thought. The anti gay marriage people make no sense. If it's really about religion, then the government shouldn't be involved in it whatsoever. If it's YOUR belief that YOUR God will smite these terrible gays, then be confident in that belief that they are all going to hell or whatever the fuck it is your believe. It doesn't affect you whatsoever. So if someone has no choice in determining their sexual preference, does that possibly mean that a pedophile has no choice either? And if so, why is the law currently discriminating against them? It's a moot point because pedophiles infringe on the rights of others (like the right to grow up without being molested by a pedophile). Gays don't. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Louis CK wrote: Shut up, burrito.
|
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
leashyourkids wrote: Seacrest wrote: Northside_Dan wrote: Bryan Fischer @BryanJFischer 7m The DOMA ruling has now made the normalization of polygamy, pedophilia, incest and bestiality inevitable. Matter of time. Still a long ways to go it seems. Scary to think that this guy is probably not alone with this thought. The anti gay marriage people make no sense. If it's really about religion, then the government shouldn't be involved in it whatsoever. If it's YOUR belief that YOUR God will smite these terrible gays, then be confident in that belief that they are all going to hell or whatever the fuck it is your believe. It doesn't affect you whatsoever. So if someone has no choice in determining their sexual preference, does that possibly mean that a pedophile has no choice either? And if so, why is the law currently discriminating against them? It's a moot point because pedophiles infringe on the rights of others (like the right to grow up without being molested by a pedophile). Gays don't. It's not a moot point because the theory you posit, is not always the case. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Don Tiny wrote: Louis Scorehead wrote: Shut up, burrito. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:26 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
pittmike wrote: I honestly do think that the polygamist groups out west will in fact win under these same arguments. I also think you are correct. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Seacrest wrote: leashyourkids wrote: It's a moot point because pedophiles infringe on the rights of others (like the right to grow up without being molested by a pedophile). Gays don't. It's not a moot point because the theory you posit, is not always the case. So are you saying that a pedophile with a willing participant will be cleared by the Supreme Court? That seems to be a leap. |
Author: | Brick [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Can't say that I agree with the pedo/bestiality comparison but I think that polygamists probably have a decent case to make in the wake of the ruling. It's now all about consent. I believe Irish Boy predicted something similar a long time ago. Children and animals cannot legally consent. A woman can consent to marry a married man.
|
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:32 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. Yeah, just what I need. Getting nagged in surround sound and getting turned down for sex multiple times a night. Sounds like fun.... |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. Correct. Neighbor has three wives? Cousin has two husbands? How's that any of your concern??? |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Seacrest wrote: leashyourkids wrote: It's a moot point because pedophiles infringe on the rights of others (like the right to grow up without being molested by a pedophile). Gays don't. It's not a moot point because the theory you posit, is not always the case. So are you saying that a pedophile with a willing participant will be cleared by the Supreme Court? That seems to be a leap. It was yesterday. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Id like to see the gays turn on the Polygimasts now |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Brick raised a solid point though. A child cant legally give consent so how can we determine they are willing? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Adults may marry other consenting adult(s) Seems bulletproof |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. Yeah, just what I need. Getting nagged in surround sound and getting turned down for sex multiple times a night. Sounds like fun.... It wouldn't be mandatory Hank. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
rogers park bryan wrote: Adults may marry other consenting adult(s) Seems bulletproof That's one issue solved. Next, rpb takes on election laws. |
Author: | SomeGuy [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. If we go down this road then the local/state/federal governments should end all marriage subsidies, tax breaks, credits and other accommodations. |
Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Don Tiny wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. Correct. Neighbor has three wives? Cousin has two husbands? How's that any of your concern??? If you have one wife, you have the answer to that question. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Hank Scorpio wrote: Brick raised a solid point though. A child cant legally give consent so how can we determine they are willing? You can't. That's why there's a legal statute. Giving this idiotic "argument" any sort of credence by even responding beyond "fuck you, you empty-headed, vapid Caller Bob" borders on being a personal failure for being personally duped by such nonsense. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
SomeGuy wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: There is no reason polygamy should be illegal. If we go down this road then the local/state/federal governments should end all marriage subsidies, tax breaks, credits and other accommodations. Fine. |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
rogers park bryan wrote: Id like to see the gays turn on the Polygimasts now Total heel turn. Marriage is 1 person and 1 person! GOD HATES MULTS!! |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Wed Jun 26, 2013 2:38 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Bryan Fischer/ AFA |
Don Tiny wrote: Hank Scorpio wrote: Brick raised a solid point though. A child cant legally give consent so how can we determine they are willing? You can't. That's why there's a legal statute. Giving this idiotic "argument" any sort of credence by even responding beyond "fuck you, you empty-headed, vapid Caller Bob" borders on being a personal failure for being personally duped by such nonsense. I don't think Seacrest is vapid. |
Page 1 of 7 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |