| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| US Supreme Court https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=80421 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Thu Jul 11, 2013 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | US Supreme Court |
Supreme Court rules Drug Companies exempt from Lawsuits July 7, 2013. Washington. In case readers missed it with all the coverage of the Trayvon Martin murder trial and the Supreme Court’s rulings on gay marriage and the Voting Rights Act, the US Supreme Court also made a ruling on lawsuits against drug companies for fraud, mislabeling, side effects and accidental death. From now on, 80 percent of all drugs are exempt from legal liability. In a 5-4 vote, the US Supreme Court struck down a lower court’s ruling and award for the victim of a pharmaceutical drug’s adverse reaction. According to the victim and the state courts, the drug caused a flesh-eating side effect that left the patient permanently disfigured over most of her body. The adverse reaction was hidden by the drug maker and later forced to be included on all warning labels. But the highest court in the land ruled that the victim had no legal grounds to sue the corporation because its drugs are exempt from lawsuits. Karen Bartlett vs. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company In 2004, Karen Bartlett was prescribed the generic anti-inflammatory drug Sulindac, manufactured by Mutual Pharmaceutical, for her sore shoulder. Three weeks after taking the drug, Bartlett began suffering from a disease called, ‘toxic epidermal necrolysis’. The condition is extremely painful and causes the victim’s skin to peel off, exposing raw flesh in the same manner as a third degree burn victim. Karen Bartlett sued Mutual Pharma in New Hampshire state court, arguing that the drug company included no warning about the possible side effect. A court agreed and awarded her $21 million. The FDA went on to force both Mutual, as well as the original drug manufacturer Merck & Co., to include the side effect on the two drugs’ warning labels going forward. Now, nine years after the tragedy began, the US Supreme Court overturned the state court’s verdict and award. Justices cited the fact that all generic drugs and their manufacturers, some 80% of all drugs consumed in the United States, are exempt from liability for side effects, mislabeling or virtually any other negative reactions caused by their drugs. In short, the Court ruled that the FDA has ultimate authority over pharmaceuticals in the US. And if the FDA says a drug is safe, that takes precedent over actual facts, real victims and any and all adverse reactions. Court ruling The Court’s ruling a week ago on behalf of generic drug makers is actually a continuation of a ruling made by the same Court in 2011. At that time, the Justices ruled that the original inventors and manufacturers of pharmaceutical drugs, also known as ‘name brand’ drugs, are the only ones that can be sued for mislabeling, fraud or adverse drug reactions and side effects. If the generic versions of the drugs are made from the exact same formula and labeled with the exact same warnings as their brand name counterparts, the generics and their manufacturers were not liable. The Court ruled, “Because it is impossible for Mutual and other similarly situated manufacturers to comply with both state and federal law, New Hampshire's warning-based design-defect cause of action is pre-empted with respect to FDA-approved drugs sold in interstate commerce." And that ruling flies in the face of both common sense and justice. And as Karen Bartlett can now attest, it leaves 240 million Americans unprotected from the deadly and torturous side effects of pharmaceutical drugs. As a reminder, the number one cause of preventable or accidental death in the US is pharmaceutical drugs. The news shouldn't be left wing or right wing, conservative or liberal. It should be the news. It should be independent - Whiteout Press Critics react Immediately upon the Supreme Court’s ruling, both drug manufacturers and Wall Street investors were celebrating. As one financial analyst pointed out, drug company profits should skyrocket going forward. Not only do the pharmaceutical companies no longer have to worry about safety or side effects, they are exempt from the multi-million dollar court-imposed settlements awarded to victims of their drugs. One industry critic was quoted by Reuters after the verdict. "Today's court decision provides a disincentive for generic makers of drugs to monitor safety of their products and to make sure that they have a surveillance system in place to detect adverse events that pose a threat to patients," Michael Carome, director of Public Citizen's Health Research Group told the news outlet. Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) was quick to react to the ruling by writing a stern letter to FDA Commissioner Margaret Hamburg, "A consumer should not have her rights foreclosed simply because she takes the generic version of a prescription drug.” But an attorney for the drug companies, Jay P. Lefkowitz, took the opposing position saying, “It makes much more sense to rely on the judgments of the scientific and medical experts at the FDA, who look at drug issues for the nation at large, than those of a single state court jury that only has in front of it the terribly unfortunate circumstances of an adverse drug reaction." In other words, if the FDA says something is safe, it doesn’t matter if that decision is wrong or the result of lies, fraud or deception on the part of the world’s pharmaceutical companies. And there’s no way to sue the FDA for being wrong and costing millions of unsuspecting Americans their lives. That result leaves 240 million Americans unprotected from an industry responsible for more preventable deaths in the US than any other cause. Government knows best. Now sit quietly like good little children and don't speak out. |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
I have a friend that works in this industry, he said that generic drugs may come from the same formula and such but quality, additives and even dosage levels will vary, sometimes wildly. Generic drug makers simply have the correct formula composition, but after that.... At least that's what he tells me. As for this....it's bullshit. The FDA is actually considered the world gold standard when it comes to guidelines, testing and certification but they are not incorruptible and they are not immune to making mistakes. With this ruling you are taking away any real consequences for the pharma industry and the government itself. In short, thousands can die and no one pays a penalty. I don't understand how this can happen. Well, I guess I can. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
This fuckin country... No Tort law or recourse for citizens. Just rely on the all-seeing, all-knowing FDA, who is funded in part by the same companies who it regulates. What a great country. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jul 11, 2013 9:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
United Corporations of America |
|
| Author: | conns7901 [ Thu Jul 11, 2013 11:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
How much money was funneled to these five judges accounts? |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Fri Jul 12, 2013 8:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
Beyond Parody Seriously, you could write a funny Onion-esque article called "US Government deem Big Pharma Untouchable" |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Fri Jul 12, 2013 11:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: US Supreme Court |
rogers park bryan wrote: Beyond Parody Seriously, you could write a funny Onion-esque article called "US Government deem Big Pharma Untouchable" I think you said it the other day but real news and the onion are on a collision course. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|