| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| "Tresty" https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=84179 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | "Tresty" |
Let's just all make a pact to stop saying it. #nohomo |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 6:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
In Tresty we trusty...yeah that's not gay at all. I overworked the Cutty thing in the Bears chat just to be annoying. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
One thing I didn't agree with Scorehead on is the idea that this is a rebuilding year. Hiring a new coach is not always indicative of a rebuilding process. This is supposed to be a guy who can get you from point B to point C, instead it seems he got the Bears to the halfway point between B and C, then just returned all the way to point B. Another reason that argument doesn't work is there are two other coaches from the newly hired coaching class of 2013 that are in the playoffs in their first year, with one (Arians) who barely missed out. IIRC, all three of those teams had losing records last year, while the Bears were a healthy 10-6. That those three teams finished better than the Bears did, despite being a bit more disadvantaged (arguably) from a personnel standpoint (there's a reason they had losing records last year), is all the more reason to criticize Trestman for this year's performance, and not to laud him for taking the team backwards from a wins and losses perspective. I am a Trestman fan, by the way, though not for long if we see more games like the collapses in Minn and Philly. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
I was referring to the nickname, but yes, anytime you disagree with Scorehead, we are in agreement. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
leashyourkids wrote: I was referring to the nickname, but yes, anytime you disagree with Scorehead, we are in agreement.  I knew you were referring to the nickname, but I associate that with SH because I've only seen him use it, and then decided to just vent about his argument that the Bears are rebuilding. My bad for derailing the thread.
|
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Leashy is right about this. |
|
| Author: | Hatchetman [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:37 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
How hard is it to just call him Tressman? |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Colonel Angus wrote: Leashy is right about this. Watch it Colonel Fellatio. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 7:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Hatchetman wrote: How hard is it to just call him Tressman? Dan Dierdorf agreesssff. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 8:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
leashyourkids wrote: Let's just all make a pact to stop saying it. #nohomo As I've never said nor typed it, and am convinced that only closeted homosexuals would find it clever to do so, you have my full support for the suggestion/nomination. |
|
| Author: | Mr. Reason [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
I'm in full support of this nomination. As an addendum, may we also include "Tresticles"? |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 8:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Thaw not how we do things here Leash. We mockingly use t til the creator gets it Similar to BeerStain I prefer Wheezy and Boo Boo though |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 8:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Don Tiny wrote: leashyourkids wrote: Let's just all make a pact to stop saying it. #nohomo As I've never said nor typed it, and am convinced that only closeted homosexuals would find it clever to do so, you have my full support for the suggestion/nomination.  Come on....jeez |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Dec 31, 2013 9:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
The problem, Mr. Park Bryan, is that the abusers never realize the sarcasm associated with their mockers' words. Just look at the mockees. I prefer a less nuanced approach that resonates with all parties. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 3:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Is there one single person who doesn't think that the Bears need to rebuild? Really? There will be major construction in Lake Forest in the offseason. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
There's no such thing as rebuilding in the NFL. You find a competent QB and try to compete every year. This isn't baseball or basketball. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 10:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Tresty better rebuild that damn defense. Honestly, who do you really want back except Briggs and Jennings? |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
I agree; I just wouldn't call it a "rebuild" in the sense that you don't try to compete. The Bears need to bring in totally new personnel on D, and they will be expected to compete, just as they were this year. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
leashyourkids wrote: I agree; I just wouldn't call it a "rebuild" in the sense that you don't try to compete. The Bears need to bring in totally new personnel on D, and they will be expected to compete, just as they were this year. I think reload is better word to describe the NFL version of this. Often times you can add a couple of well placed pieces and in one off season, you can contend. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
The goddamn Chiefs were 2-14 last year and can win the SB. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
Nobody gets a cute,cuddly nickname UNTIL THEY EARN IT!!!! Raymont Harris=ultra back????????????????? James Thornton=RoboCop???????????????? |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
In defense of James Thornton,he was one of the most ripped athletes I have ever stood next to. He took a picture with my son years ago. He seemed like a nice guy,just not doing much at TE. |
|
| Author: | ZephMarshack [ Wed Jan 01, 2014 5:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
I endorse this nomination, though this doesn't yet infuriate me as much as Brent Musburger's references to "Herbie," which I'm about to hear countless times tonight. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Thu Jan 02, 2014 11:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: "Tresty" |
jimmypasta wrote: In defense of James Thornton,he was one of the most ripped athletes I have ever stood next to. He took a picture with my son years ago. He seemed like a nice guy,just not doing much at TE. Not a lot going on north of the shoulders there. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|