Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Indiana Pacers
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=86098
Page 1 of 2

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Sun Mar 30, 2014 7:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Indiana Pacers

5 and 5 in their last 10 games and now tied with the Miami Heat in the loss column. Playing absolutely dreadful basketball and pissing away home court advantage in the eastern conference. Their latest blunder was a beat down at the hands of the powerful Cleveland Cavaliers. "Superstar" Paul George is shooting 37 % in the month of March and has been resembling Brandon Jennings. This team better get their shit together fast because the playoffs are approaching.

Author:  good dolphin [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:33 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

regular season games don't matter

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Some selfish dudes in here,” Roy Hibbert muttered Friday night, after getting eight shots in the Pacers’ loss to the Wizards. “Some selfish dudes. I’m tired of talking about it. We’ve been talking about it for a month.”

“We play hard, but we’ve got to move the ball,” Hibbert said. “Is it obvious, or what? I don’t know whatever our assist ratio, or whatever it is, is in the league, but it probably isn’t up there. I’m really trying hard not to spaz out right now, but I don’t know. We’ve been talking about it for a month. I’m not handling the rock. I don’t know. I’ve made suggestions before and we do it for, like, one game, and then we revert back to what we are. I don’t know. I’m not the one to answer that question. It directly affects me and the bigs. We’re just out there and it makes us look bad.”

Not a good sign at all that on top of playing like garbage they're also having chemistry problems weeks before the playoffs. Looks like that douchebag Dwyane Wade might be in the finals yet again.

Author:  FavreFan [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 6:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Roy Hibbert wants to handle the ball more? :lol:

Author:  spmack [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:28 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


You really think that's a possibility? I tend to think, even with all of their problems, that the Pacers are just far too talented for the Bulls. They do lack leadership though. Paul George is just not the guy he was built up as earlier in the season. He's a chucker.

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the CSFMB. Expect the worst arguments possible.


:D

Author:  leashyourkids [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


Duh.

Author:  spmack [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:34 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Powerhouse233 wrote:
spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


You really think that's a possibility? I tend to think, even with all of their problems, that the Pacers are just far too talented for the Bulls. They do lack leadership though. Paul George is just not the guy he was built up as earlier in the season. He's a chucker.

I may be looking through my red colored glasses, but yes I could see it. They can steal one down in Indy. Hell, the Bulls fans would probably be louder than the Pacers fans down there.

And Paul George should have just stuck with Doc Rivers' daughter instead of the other hoes. That seemed to mess up his game, too.

Author:  spmack [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

veganfan21 wrote:
spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the CSFMB. Expect the worst arguments possible.


:D

Let's revisit this in a month and a half.

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 7:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

spmack wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the CSFMB. Expect the worst arguments possible.


:D

Let's revisit this in a month and a half.


Let's do it.

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Pacers just got blown out at home by the well-oiled machine that is the Spurs. This is their 3rd consecutive game where they've failed to reach 80 points.

Author:  veganfan21 [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 8:40 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

veganfan21 wrote:
spmack wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
spmack wrote:
No leadership. Bulls will beat them in 2nd round.


Boilermaker Rick wrote:
It's the CSFMB. Expect the worst arguments possible.


:D

Let's revisit this in a month and a half.


Let's do it.


The only way they don't reach the ECF is by imploding and turning on their coach. Not impossible, but highly unlikely in my opinion. They know they're good and that the only eastern team to worry about is Miami. You wanna bet our signatures on this?

Author:  Nas [ Mon Mar 31, 2014 9:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

I agree with Spmack. I've been saying the same thing for a while. I believe the Bulls matchup better against them than they do the Heat. Considering the way they are playing I could see the Bulls knock them off in the 2nd round. Problem is I'm not sure the Bulls can beat the Nets. I really hope they get the 3rd seed or it could be 1 and done.

Author:  Bagels [ Tue Apr 01, 2014 6:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

i blame Evan Turner

clubhouse cancer....

Author:  Powerhouse233 [ Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

What a pack of chokers this bunch is.

Author:  pittmike [ Thu Apr 24, 2014 8:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Allow me to walk down the Bernsie aisle for a minute. If you cannot have momentum, clutch and all those myriad of things as these guys are professionals doing their jobs and drinking coffee and reading mail. Then how can you have a clubhouse cancer?

Author:  Bagels [ Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:16 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

pittmike wrote:
Allow me to walk down the Bernsie aisle for a minute. If you cannot have momentum, clutch and all those myriad of things as these guys are professionals doing their jobs and drinking coffee and reading mail. Then how can you have a clubhouse cancer?


are you asking me ?

Author:  Douchebag [ Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:27 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Bagels wrote:
i blame Evan Turner

clubhouse cancer....

Prediction: Pacers in 6.

Author:  RFDC [ Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
i blame Evan Turner

clubhouse cancer....

Prediction: Pacers in 6.

Didn't you predict Bulls to win game two in a blowout?

Author:  Bagels [ Fri Apr 25, 2014 7:34 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

RFDC wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
i blame Evan Turner

clubhouse cancer....

Prediction: Pacers in 6.

Didn't you predict Bulls to win game two in a blowout?


for the record, i predict they split in DC then lose game 5 at home so they can go fishin'

Author:  Bagels [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

what a piece of garbage

and the Hawks were desperately trying to give that game away

you don't start playing not to lose with over a quarter left :lol:

Author:  Bagels [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 6:58 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

i loved Stu Jackson on the postgame on NBA TV too....you're used to analysts not really offering much of an opinion but he was like the Hawks are going to close it out next game, the Pacers are fractured, they give up at the first sign of adversity, etc....really really harsh, it was refreshing .

Author:  Douchebag [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:05 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Bagels wrote:
i loved Stu Jackson on the postgame on NBA TV too....you're used to analysts not really offering much of an opinion but he was like the Hawks are going to close it out next game, the Pacers are fractured, they give up at the first sign of adversity, etc....really really harsh, it was refreshing .

I'm not really sure what happened between now and last season. They never folded against Miami last year, and took the fight to them every game. This is essentially the same roster this season too. Was Brian Shaw really holding this team together that much as an assistant? Can Bynum be a clubhouse cancer on a team where he has played like 2 games?

Author:  Bagels [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:08 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Douchebag wrote:
Can Bynum be a clubhouse cancer on a team where he has played like 2 games?


or maybe getting rid of Granger was bad juju ?

who knows

fire Vogel....

Author:  redskingreg [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 7:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
i loved Stu Jackson on the postgame on NBA TV too....you're used to analysts not really offering much of an opinion but he was like the Hawks are going to close it out next game, the Pacers are fractured, they give up at the first sign of adversity, etc....really really harsh, it was refreshing .

I'm not really sure what happened between now and last season. They never folded against Miami last year, and took the fight to them every game. This is essentially the same roster this season too. Was Brian Shaw really holding this team together that much as an assistant? Can Bynum be a clubhouse cancer on a team where he has played like 2 games?


The Hansborough Effect.

Author:  rogers park bryan [ Tue Apr 29, 2014 8:41 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

redskingreg wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Bagels wrote:
i loved Stu Jackson on the postgame on NBA TV too....you're used to analysts not really offering much of an opinion but he was like the Hawks are going to close it out next game, the Pacers are fractured, they give up at the first sign of adversity, etc....really really harsh, it was refreshing .

I'm not really sure what happened between now and last season. They never folded against Miami last year, and took the fight to them every game. This is essentially the same roster this season too. Was Brian Shaw really holding this team together that much as an assistant? Can Bynum be a clubhouse cancer on a team where he has played like 2 games?


The Hansborough Effect.

I know you're joking, but there is probably something to that.

When one guy is diving all over the place for every loose ball and playing every Defensive set like its the game 7 of the finals.... it tends to spread to the rest of the team

Author:  Bagels [ Tue May 06, 2014 6:44 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

the corpse of Drew Gooden took them to school last night
hopefully the Wiz sweep this so we only have to watch the bare minimum of this garbage

Author:  Brick [ Tue May 06, 2014 6:51 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

I guess they'll have to go back to complaining about that one series against the Bulls they "should have" won.

Author:  Bagels [ Tue May 06, 2014 7:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Indiana Pacers

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
I guess they'll have to go back to complaining about that one series against the Bulls they "should have" won.


it took me awhile to realize that this series was literally John Wall vs. Evan Turner

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/