| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| EMERY's STATS https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=90016 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | EMERY's STATS |
Phil Emery really started pulling out some of this famous in house stats today to support why guys are good! J allen had 3 QB knockdowns and Lamar has the most QB touches and SHea disrupted 3 or 4 routes in week 2, kinda like last years when Shea led the team in disruptions in the backfield. It's like he is playing in his own Fantasy football league and he makes up the stat categories as it goes along. I understand KNOCK DOWN ON A QB, but I didnt see them knock down Brady hard enough to make him think twice about the next play. All alleged 3 times! |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 10:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. You very well could be correct....and if you are, the one guy that can fix it is the problem. Emery Yup, would take huge balls to can Tresty and most of his staff, but if thats the problem, then it has to be! |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. You are correct sir. Especially about Trestman. When Lance Briggs told him he skipping a practice for the first game of the season, for a soft restaurant opening, any doubt that Tresty wasn't the right choice for coach vanished in a puff of jet smoke. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
What do you think Lovie would have said? I don't think Lance would have asked Lovie or they both would have been quiet about it. Lance has been pouting for 2 seasons. I'm kinda at the point where I say fuck his fat Lambo crashing ass. He's nothing without 54. Trestman is not good, no excuse for him. |
|
| Author: | newper [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
If you look at this as 16 one game seasons, the Bears have gone undefeated 3 times this season -- and the Patriots only managed to go undefeated once, and lost the Superbowl. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
That was Awesome! Even if Eli won. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Oct 27, 2014 11:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
I hate those old Dolphins more than I've ever hated NE or any other team. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
The worst stats are those he researched to prove Urlacher wrong. Why would you ever spend time on that bullshit? If I were his employer I'd average out his salary to a per hour basis then deduct from his paycheck all the labor time he spent on researching that stuff. That has no relevance to the team at all. |
|
| Author: | Rod [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 6:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. Nope. It's Cutler. Nobody has ever found a coach he can play for. Time for a new offensive coordinator and some more excuses. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Spaulding wrote: What do you think Lovie would have said? I don't think Lance would have asked Lovie or they both would have been quiet about it. Lance has been pouting for 2 seasons. I'm kinda at the point where I say fuck his fat Lambo crashing ass. He's nothing without 54. Trestman is not good, no excuse for him. Lovie wouldn't have to say anything. Briggs and other players respecte him. They wouldn't have ever dreamed of going. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Seacrest wrote: Spaulding wrote: What do you think Lovie would have said? I don't think Lance would have asked Lovie or they both would have been quiet about it. Lance has been pouting for 2 seasons. I'm kinda at the point where I say fuck his fat Lambo crashing ass. He's nothing without 54. Trestman is not good, no excuse for him. Lovie wouldn't have to say anything. Briggs and other players respecte him. They wouldn't have ever dreamed of going. Agreed. Trestman is the substitute teacher. |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Sir takes a lot on this board but he has been very vocal and out in front about calling management out on their excuses. He was even mocking Houston, who is a regular guest on his show. I'd love to see him call that guy out next week when he makes his next appearance. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. Nope. It's Cutler. Nobody has ever found a coach he can play for. Time for a new offensive coordinator and some more excuses. Mike Shanahan. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Quote: Jay Cutler is a winning quarterback in this league and no matter how you analyze the history of quarterbacks in the NFL, if you have a winning record you are an elite player at that position
|
|
| Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Whoever decided they needed to have the frequency of press conferences is the problem, as they've become so much superfluous drivel. Good call BF, as it seems he not only makes them up as he goes along but fails to see the other stats that are far more important. Reading from the Boston perspective they cite how the Bears are not just predictable but lacking the will to change. Cutler will throw the ball high and likes his receivers to stop and catch the ball, thus the corners jammed at the line and then covered deep. They let Marshall eat up the cushion coming out of the break and then broke on the ball. Darrelle Revis gave up "Ze ro" catches with that approach. They let Forte have the check down route but spied it heavily. On defense, wherever the Bears gave a cushion to the receiver that was where the ball would go, behind the linebackers who play too shallow. Brady had 5 incompletions on 35 attempts (an official stat, Phil) which meant the Patriots saw who was open and executed with an 85% football efficiency (my stat). Emery needs to have more speed at the receiver position to prevent the corners from playing jam & cover. Trestman has to understand that running the ball is the only way to make a defense adjust. Tucker is useless as from day one his scheme is a failure. Cutler is who he is, which is not an elite QB. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. Nope. It's Cutler. Nobody has ever found a coach he can play for. Time for a new offensive coordinator and some more excuses. Agreed. Doesnt make Tresty or Emery any better, but Jay Cutler will never win a Super Bowl |
|
| Author: | ZephMarshack [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 7:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
"Other Phil Emery Stats" would be a good Friday Fung. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
rogers park bryan wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. Nope. It's Cutler. Nobody has ever found a coach he can play for. Time for a new offensive coordinator and some more excuses. Agreed. Doesnt make Tresty or Emery any better, but Jay Cutler will never win a Super Bowl Dan Bernstein I will remember this |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
remember when Emery's stats were thought to show what progressive and deeply intelligent GM he was |
|
| Author: | No Clever Moniker [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Was that right before or right after the "Golden Era of Chicago GMs"? I forget. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 8:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
The fact that he cited the remarkable "Cutler/Urlacher era" is hilarious in itself. Who doesn't look back fondly on all the success we had during that time? We only fired the GM, coach, and then one of the players because it was so good! |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 9:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
Nas wrote: I don't think Emery is the problem. The #1 problem with this team is Trestman and Tucker. They are up there, but the #1 problem with this team are the McCaskey's and Ted Philips.
|
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 9:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
good dolphin wrote: Sir takes a lot on this board but he has been very vocal and out in front about calling management out on their excuses. He was even mocking Houston, who is a regular guest on his show. I'd love to see him call that guy out next week when he makes his next appearance. exactly, not sure which is worse, not saying anything about the guy, or talking shit about him, until he shows up. |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Tue Oct 28, 2014 11:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: EMERY's STATS |
How do you capitalize every letter but one in the thread title? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|