Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Those were the days crowd https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=95460 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Those were the days crowd |
It seems to me that there has been many a reference made to the board's glory days lately. I have partaken in such endeavors on a few occasions, but lately this line of thinking needs a little revision, if you will. While there were certainly some legendary board moments during this period, there were also a number of clunkers. As a casual observer of the board scene during this era, I truly think that it is my civic duty as the self professed and proclaim long time guy, to point out some of the lower points of this board's glorious history. 1. There was far too much hand knobbing of host, in particular Dan McNeil. The constant peppering of McNeil to start Ask Mac threads or questions about the next time he was going fishing or to the cottage were positively nauseating. There was a constant need to kiss his ass simply because he posted on this board. It is noteworthy that his decline in popularity coincided with the reduction in posting rate. If you are one of the people that clamored for his return to the airwaves, or ever asked him to start an Ask Mac thread, or questioned him about return to cottage or fishing, them it's you I am referring to. 2. Goff. Goff also was whole lot more popular when he posted around here. There was a lot of Goff needs his own show talk when he actively posted. He became a stumbling bumbling baffoon that laughs too much and talks about race only once he stopped posting. 3. Same with drinky. His speech patterns have always been a problem yet not so much when he posted. There were a number of people that posted during this pd that were quality posters and truly added to this board but there were also a number of assholes too. I was as I say a casual observer during this pd and didn't really post or check often but I do remember the ALS thing to be a pervasive part of this board with respect to the hosts. I always got the feeling that they were playing people around here. |
Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Mitch probably told Goff to stop posting here. He couldn't stand to see such a lightly armed man enter into such a fierce battle. |
Author: | bigfan [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Lots of bad thinking. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:44 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
bigfan wrote: Lots of bad thinking. In what way? |
Author: | Bagels [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 8:58 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
RIP Mike Stivic |
Author: | Juiced [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
long time guy wrote: bigfan wrote: Lots of bad thinking. In what way? In a bad way? I agree, bunch of ass kissers in the Ask Mac thread. |
Author: | jimmypasta [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
I'm more of a Fred Huebner guy. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
I have never been a "board was better 2 years ago" guy. I like Dan Mc Neil's work for the past 20 or so years. I am unapologetic about that. I challenged him here when it was necessary and gave him praise when it was deserved. Goff and drinky were fun posters. They had a good show together and probably earned a greater role. I still think they are both good on the radio. I don't know why you would pick out either of these of examples of defining the board's character. The interactions with all three were relatively minor. If you want to talk about bad board eras, you could start the period where groups of posters began to give names to their cliques. All that being said, I have enjoyed the board from its inception, from the guest era to today |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
good dolphin wrote: I have never been a "board was better 2 years ago" guy. I like Dan Mc Neil's work for the past 20 or so years. I am unapologetic about that. I challenged him here when it was necessary and gave him praise when it was deserved. Goff and drinky were fun posters. They had a good show together and probably earned a greater role. I still think they are both good on the radio. I don't know why you would pick out either of these of examples of defining the board's character. The interactions with all three were relatively minor. If you want to talk about bad board eras, you could start the period where groups of posters began to give names to their cliques. All that being said, I have enjoyed the board from its inception, from the guest era to today He needed a strawman-type basis in order to make another dopey thread. |
Author: | W_Z [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 9:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
STU-GOTZ was getting worse, spmack was always here first, Gloopan Kuratz forgot his purse Those were the days! |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:03 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
W_Z wrote: STU-GOTZ was getting worse, spmack was always here first, Gloopan Kuratz forgot his purse Those were the days! |
Author: | spmack [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
W_Z wrote: STU-GOTZ was getting worse, spmack was always here first, Gloopan Kuratz forgot his purse Those were the days! |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
good dolphin wrote: I have never been a "board was better 2 years ago" guy. I like Dan Mc Neil's work for the past 20 or so years. I am unapologetic about that. I challenged him here when it was necessary and gave him praise when it was deserved. Goff and drinky were fun posters. They had a good show together and probably earned a greater role. I still think they are both good on the radio. I don't know why you would pick out either of these of examples of defining the board's character. The interactions with all three were relatively minor. If you want to talk about bad board eras, you could start the period where groups of posters began to give names to their cliques. All that being said, I have enjoyed the board from its inception, from the guest era to today I wanted to throw that in, but I'd written a rather long passage and thought it was time to chill. There was a rather incestuous vibe to that whole thing too. I like posting and I don't want to give the impression that I do not. It's cool interacting with people on here. This was really in reference to those that constantly believe that it is there duty to provide referendums and assessments on today's message board. There were a number of guys that I enjoyed reading from that period, as there are a number of people that I enjoy reading from this pd. That period is always presented as the golden age of the board but there were things that were simply not all that golden. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Don Tiny wrote: good dolphin wrote: I have never been a "board was better 2 years ago" guy. I like Dan Mc Neil's work for the past 20 or so years. I am unapologetic about that. I challenged him here when it was necessary and gave him praise when it was deserved. Goff and drinky were fun posters. They had a good show together and probably earned a greater role. I still think they are both good on the radio. I don't know why you would pick out either of these of examples of defining the board's character. The interactions with all three were relatively minor. If you want to talk about bad board eras, you could start the period where groups of posters began to give names to their cliques. All that being said, I have enjoyed the board from its inception, from the guest era to today He needed a strawman-type basis in order to make another dopey thread. It's not surprising that you would say this. It's not surprising on a number of levels. The next time you have a relevant or cogent thought on anything, do me a favor, hold a damn parade. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
long time guy wrote: This was really in reference to those that constantly believe that it is there duty to provide referendums and assessments on today's message board. So you decided to do basically the same thing for ....... what purpose exactly? |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Don Tiny wrote: long time guy wrote: This was really in reference to those that constantly believe that it is there duty to provide referendums and assessments on today's message board. So you decided to do basically the same thing for ....... what purpose exactly? Possibly to start as you say, a dopey thread. Seriously I'm not really providing an assessment or referendum on the state of the current board as much as I am providing an observation of the board of yesteryear. Sometimes there is an Utopian view held that is simply not valid. |
Author: | Spaulding [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. |
Author: | IMU [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Spaulding wrote: Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. I've mellowed. Everyone else seems 10x more prickly. |
Author: | Hawg Ass [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
IMU wrote: Spaulding wrote: Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. I've mellowed. Everyone else seems 10x more prickly. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
long time guy wrote: Don Tiny wrote: long time guy wrote: This was really in reference to those that constantly believe that it is there duty to provide referendums and assessments on today's message board. So you decided to do basically the same thing for ....... what purpose exactly? Possibly to start as you say, a dopey thread. Seriously I'm not really providing an assessment or referendum on the state of the current board as much as I am providing an observation of the board of yesteryear. Sometimes there is an Utopian view held that is simply not valid. That's fine, except I was under the distinct impression - through your own words - you were starting said thread to denigrate the practice, which then obviously looks bizarre when juxtaposed with your doing essentially the same thing, albeit from a different angle. This topic has been done to death with point and counterpoint about the pros and cons, but there's nobody in their right mind that thinks the board is flourishing in any way like it has a time or two in the past. That's not to say it's wretched right now and/or it'll never be "as good" again, but your overall take that reminiscing is entirely tainted by false memories is categorically wrong, and you'll be hard pressed to find anyone of any note who will agree with your posit. |
Author: | good dolphin [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Spaulding wrote: Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. yep I want as many posters at this site as possible no matter the irritation some may cause. I hate that during the MSFMB wars we lost guys not to the other board but to not posting at all. It sucks that others don't post simply because of disagreement in the administration of the board. |
Author: | Spaulding [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:45 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
good dolphin wrote: yep I want as many posters at this site as possible no matter the irritation some may cause. I hate that during the MSFMB wars we lost guys not to the other board but to not posting at all. It sucks that others don't post simply because of disagreement in the administration of the board. People and things have shelf lifes. Some used here as pure entertainment, some to be different than in real life, some to be what they truly are, some was just common interest, some where they got serious, some where they got crazy, some began to think they were more important than they were, some had a tough time with all that was just mentioned. That's going to cause friction at some point. It's what the French call it is the life. That MSFMB thing really sticks with you. Are the final numbers or things that matched up with your interests that high or is it the principle that bugs you that much? |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Don Tiny wrote: long time guy wrote: Don Tiny wrote: long time guy wrote: This was really in reference to those that constantly believe that it is there duty to provide referendums and assessments on today's message board. So you decided to do basically the same thing for ....... what purpose exactly? Possibly to start as you say, a dopey thread. Seriously I'm not really providing an assessment or referendum on the state of the current board as much as I am providing an observation of the board of yesteryear. Sometimes there is an Utopian view held that is simply not valid. That's fine, except I was under the distinct impression - through your own words - you were starting said thread to denigrate the practice, which then obviously looks bizarre when juxtaposed with your doing essentially the same thing, albeit from a different angle. This topic has been done to death with point and counterpoint about the pros and cons, but there's nobody in their right mind that thinks the board is flourishing in any way like it has a time or two in the past. That's not to say it's wretched right now and/or it'll never be "as good" again, but your overall take that reminiscing is entirely tainted by false memories is categorically wrong, and you'll be hard pressed to find anyone of any note who will agree with your posit. You are conflating the argument. I am not saying the board is necessarily better today. That's not my point. Wasn't some of the board attrition due to a mutiny of sorts. That was of their own choice and also speaks to their own unhappiness with the place. I enjoyed reading their stuff also. I didn't even post that much then but I would check it every six months or so. However the longing for the good old days obscures some of the issues that arose during that era. There have been newer posters that have contributed to the board and often times they are belittled or ridiculed simply because they are not part of some perverted board establishment. There I have provided an assessment for you. The topic may have been done to death but I have never really spoken on it til now. Maybe I have missed my proverbial beat but I just thought I would throw it out there and see what people thought. |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:54 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Potluck at work today. I guess i didnt bring the appropriate item |
Author: | Brick [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 11:55 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
good dolphin wrote: Spaulding wrote: Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. yep I want as many posters at this site as possible no matter the irritation some may cause. I hate that during the MSFMB wars we lost guys not to the other board but to not posting at all. It sucks that others don't post simply because of disagreement in the administration of the board. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: good dolphin wrote: Spaulding wrote: Not quite, imo, but nonetheless, this thread makes me sad. I don't know if it was better but it was new to me and maybe all of us being the us of 10 years ago had something to do with it. People/posters have changed over the years too. Radio was better and I miss some of the posters that are no longer here. yep I want as many posters at this site as possible no matter the irritation some may cause. I hate that during the MSFMB wars we lost guys not to the other board but to not posting at all. It sucks that others don't post simply because of disagreement in the administration of the board. It was for me also but when it's your board you can do with it as you please. In some ways this board reflects the views of sports talk radio in general. There are some on here that only want posters that they can agree with. It's not difficult to ascertain who the individuals are that constitute membership in said group. |
Author: | Spaulding [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
IkeSouth wrote: Potluck at work today. I guess i didnt bring the appropriate item Would people eat what you make? |
Author: | Matches Malone [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:28 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Spaulding wrote: IkeSouth wrote: Potluck at work today. I guess i didnt bring the appropriate item Would people eat what you make? As long as it's made with love. |
Author: | Hatchetman [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Matches Malone wrote: Spaulding wrote: IkeSouth wrote: Potluck at work today. I guess i didnt bring the appropriate item Would people eat what you make? As long as it's made with love. EWWWW. |
Author: | Chus [ Thu Aug 13, 2015 12:35 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Those were the days crowd |
Spaulding wrote: It's what the French call it is the life. Say la vee. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |