| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| NHL TV coverage https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=96770 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Blackcloud [ Mon Oct 19, 2015 5:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | NHL TV coverage |
I have noticed, whether it has been NBCSN or Comcast, that as soon as the teams are in the penalty situation, the game is shown from the Skycam or Raftercam or the Angellookingdownfromheaven cam. The major complaint about hockey on TV is not being able to follow the puck, so naturally they make it feel like your watching from outer space. I hate that camera shot in football, basketball and now in hockey. I wish the XFL had never introduced this damn thing. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Mon Oct 19, 2015 6:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
"in the penalty situation?" I think it's fine if done with care. Don't you think there must be some merit to presenting what's usually a series of set plays from that angle? Why would they make a telecast harder to explain? |
|
| Author: | shakes [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
Blackcloud wrote: I have noticed, whether it has been NBCSN or Comcast, that as soon as the teams are in the penalty situation, the game is shown from the Skycam or Raftercam or the Angellookingdownfromheaven cam. The major complaint about hockey on TV is not being able to follow the puck, so naturally they make it feel like your watching from outer space. I hate that camera shot in football, basketball and now in hockey. I wish the XFL had never introduced this damn thing. I'm with you 100%! Its like watching the game from SRO in the upper level. Just awful. Can't even see the puck half the time and the angle is so odd that its hard to tell if shots are on net or not. its so bad I found myself fastforwarding through parts of the power plays. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 12:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
If the technician/producer didn't insist on zooming in/out/side-to-side I would prefer the SkyCam POV over the current traditional view. The SkyCam view gives you a better view of the rink and passing lanes/angles. It's when they zoom and follow the player/puck where the technology is being misused. |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
It all went down hill after they scrapped the FoxTrax puck. |
|
| Author: | Gloopan Kuratz [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
All American camera people should watch Toronto or Montreal telecasts on Hockey Night in Canada and copy them. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Oct 20, 2015 1:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: NHL TV coverage |
HNIC ain't what it used to be now that Rogers took over production from the CBC. TSN's coverage is probably the best now. Kirkwood wrote: If the technician/producer didn't insist on zooming in/out/side-to-side I would prefer the SkyCam POV over the current traditional view. The SkyCam view gives you a better view of the rink and passing lanes/angles. It's when they zoom and follow the player/puck where the technology is being misused. Right, exactly. When it's static, it's advantageous for watching power plays. When it's moving around, I want to barf. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|