Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Father Pfleger https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=75&t=98581 |
Page 1 of 6 |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:49 am ] |
Post subject: | Father Pfleger |
Flying a Chiraq flag above Old Glory at Saint Sabina.What a douche |
Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:52 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Exhibit B |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 8:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:04 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
He certainly is an agitator. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" Why do you disagree? |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:10 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Antonio Enrique Chaidez Today at 7:40am This is an outrage and a disgrace not only to the church but to the City of Chicago, we the people of chicago demand that this flag be removed immediately if not sooner! |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" Why do you disagree? I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:11 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
This is pretty stupid, even for him. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Frank Coztansa wrote: This is pretty stupid, even for him. Is it? |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:15 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Antonio Enrique Chaidez Today at 7:40am This is an outrage and a disgrace not only to the church but to the City of Chicago, we the people of chicago demand that this flag be removed immediately if not sooner! Stupid FB People it has been removed |
Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:16 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
pittmike wrote: He certainly is an agitator. Exhibit C |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:17 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Antonio Enrique Chaidez Today at 7:40am This is an outrage and a disgrace not only to the church but to the City of Chicago, we the people of chicago demand that this flag be removed immediately if not sooner! Stupid FB People it has been removed What has been removed? |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
It is. Its going to cause enough of an uproar for him even to fly that flag, so he would definitely get it noticed and have the TV cameras there. To put it above the American flag is pretty much just a slap in the face to everybody. And that is my issue with it. I get free speech and all, but to burn the flag, fly it upside down, or to put something else above it is just total Dbag behavior IMHO, There are plenty of ways for him to get his voice out there. All this is going to do is cause people who do not know who he is to think, "Wow this guy is an asshole" |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:18 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Antonio Enrique Chaidez Today at 7:40am This is an outrage and a disgrace not only to the church but to the City of Chicago, we the people of chicago demand that this flag be removed immediately if not sooner! "Immediately if not sooner"? That's giving it 110%. |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Did he really do that? I can't find actual confirmation online. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:20 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Tom Murphy Today at 8:05am I'm leaving the Catholic church. Thanks The faith is strong in that one |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:21 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Walt Williams Neck wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Antonio Enrique Chaidez Today at 7:40am This is an outrage and a disgrace not only to the church but to the City of Chicago, we the people of chicago demand that this flag be removed immediately if not sooner! Stupid FB People it has been removed What has been removed? The Chiraq flag |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:22 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Did he really do that? I can't find actual confirmation online. Im 87% sure it's a photoshop job gone Chi-ral And now the Catholic church is short one Tom Murphy |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:23 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Tom Murphy Today at 8:05am I'm leaving the Catholic church. Thanks The faith is strong in that one Of all the reasons to leave the Catholic church! * *Nas will not accuse me of "attacking Catholics". It's only Muslims that have special protection for reprehensible ideas/actions. |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:24 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" Why do you disagree? I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country Ok then we agree. It is the law. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:25 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Tom Murphy Today at 8:05am I'm leaving the Catholic church. Thanks The faith is strong in that one Of all the reasons to leave the Catholic church! * *Nas will not accuse me of "attacking Catholics". It's only Muslims that have special protection for reprehensible ideas/actions. I may re-enlist just to offset that guy |
Author: | Rod [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" Why do you disagree? I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country Ok then we agree. It is the law. I'm sure that's not true. It's a protocol. |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:26 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Tom Murphy Today at 8:05am I'm leaving the Catholic church. Thanks The faith is strong in that one Of all the reasons to leave the Catholic church! * *Nas will not accuse me of "attacking Catholics". It's only Muslims that have special protection for reprehensible ideas/actions. This. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Hundreds of facebook posts asking him to "take down the Chiraq flag" Why do you disagree? I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country Ok then we agree. It is the law. I think it's a code, not law Either way. Nothing should be photoshopped above our flag |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: I'm sure that's not true. It's a protocol. Then it is my law. |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
pittmike wrote: Then it is my law. Bigamy?
|
Author: | Don Tiny [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:29 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country Ok then we agree. It is the law. I'm sure that's not true. It's a protocol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code The United States Flag Code establishes advisory rules for display and care of the national flag of the United States of America. It is Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the United States Code (4 U.S.C. § 1 et seq). This is a U.S. federal law, but the penalty described in Federal Law 18 USC Section 700 for failure to comply with it is not enforced. |
Author: | pittmike [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:31 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
Don Tiny wrote: Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: pittmike wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: I dont think any flag should fly above Old Glory in this country Ok then we agree. It is the law. I'm sure that's not true. It's a protocol. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Flag_Code The United States Flag Code establishes advisory rules for display and care of the national flag of the United States of America. It is Chapter 1 of Title 4 of the United States Code (4 U.S.C. § 1 et seq). This is a U.S. federal law, but the penalty described in Federal Law 18 USC Section 700 for failure to comply with it is not enforced. Thanks Catman. |
Author: | Furious Styles [ Thu Feb 04, 2016 9:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Father Pfleger |
rogers park bryan wrote: Either way. Nothing should be photoshopped above our flag |
Page 1 of 6 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |