Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Seriously?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=101951
Page 1 of 2

Author:  leashyourkids [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Seriously?

I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.

Author:  Baby McNown [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.


It's not the original, but it's a damn fine cover.

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Shoulda gone with The Boxer

Author:  leashyourkids [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Baby McNown wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.


It's not the original, but it's a damn fine cover.


It's a terrible cover. Next time we have an outing, I will perform Sound of Silence better than that hack. Favrefan will hold me to it.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

leashyourkids wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.


It's not the original, but it's a damn fine cover.


It's a terrible cover. Next time we have an outing, I will perform Sound of Silence better than that hack. Favrefan will hold me to it.


The second you go off-key, I'm punching you in the throat. I can hear quarter-tones, so good luck.

Author:  leashyourkids [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Don Tiny wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.


It's not the original, but it's a damn fine cover.


It's a terrible cover. Next time we have an outing, I will perform Sound of Silence better than that hack. Favrefan will hold me to it.


The second you go off-key, I'm punching you in the throat. I can hear quarter-tones, so good luck.


Deal.

Author:  Chus [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen. My music tastes consist of whatever I have downloaded over the past couple decades (and that ain't much). Tonight, for complicated reasons, I was asked to play some Simon and Garfunkel. So I searched for Sound of Silence. The first thing that popped up was an idiotic rip-off by some asshole from "Disturbed." MANY in the comments said his rendition is better than the original...

What a fucking joke... Art Garfunkel is an American treasure, and to compare his beautiful tenor voice to some asshole wannabe who probably organizes dog fights is a travesty. We should just concede to ISIS after reading that nonsense.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekVhH4LRfDQ

Author:  Don Tiny [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

I'm going to stab leash in in the ass with a grill fork for even putting the knowledge of this thing in my head.

It's crap, you got that much right.

It's predictably engineered (esp the voice post-production) and orchestrated (oh neato, it just keeps getting louder and louder, how fucking interesting).

He made the song about himself instead of performing the song as though it were important.

At least in olden days when bands didn't have much talent they had the decency to bring in cats who did to quietly make hit records (if you're not hip to 'The Wrecking Crew', for example, go learn yourself something tonight or this weekend). Now they just stand there and say 'look how talented I can sound' rather than 'look how talented I actually am'. Same lie, less talent.

Then again, this is like the time I about put someone through a wall that (a) though that Metallica's version of 'Turn the Page' was the first and only one, and then (b) that it was better.

Why am I writing this? Worse, why are you reading it?

Author:  Furious Styles [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

I would have gone with the traditional English ballad "Sandwich Fair."

Author:  Baby McNown [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:31 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

And DT hearing quarter tones is for beginners. ;-)

Author:  W_Z [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Furious Styles wrote:
I would have gone with the traditional English ballad "Sandwich Fair."


Are you going to Sandwich Fair?
Turkey club, ham swiss or roast beef
I'm partial to mayonnaise and bacon
And if you could, no tomato please

Author:  leashyourkids [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:36 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Don Tiny wrote:
I'm going to stab leash in in the ass with a grill fork for even putting the knowledge of this thing in my head.

It's crap, you got that much right.

It's predictably engineered (esp the voice post-production) and orchestrated (oh neato, it just keeps getting louder and louder, how fucking interesting).

He made the song about himself instead of performing the song as though it were important.

At least in olden days when bands didn't have much talent they had the decency to bring in cats who did to quietly make hit records (if you're not hip to 'The Wrecking Crew', for example, go learn yourself something tonight or this weekend). Now they just stand there and say 'look how talented I can sound' rather than 'look how talented I actually am'. Same lie, less talent.

Then again, this is like the time I about put someone through a wall that (a) though that Metallica's version of 'Turn the Page' was the first and only one, and then (b) that it was better.

Why am I writing this? Worse, why are you reading it?


:lol: Goddammit, I love you, Don Tiny. Let me know if you're ever on a bridge over troubled water.

Author:  Furious Styles [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:46 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Forget gen X, leash is a goddamn baby boomer.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 8:57 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Furious Styles wrote:
Forget gen X, leash is a goddamn baby boomer.

Nah ... he's hardly what I would consider significantly over-hyped.

Author:  GoldenJet [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Put me in the "terrible cover" camp

Author:  FavreFan [ Wed Aug 24, 2016 10:19 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Yup, pure garbage. Made it to about the 2:40 mark and called it quits.

Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:15 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

leashyourkids wrote:
I am literally the least knowledgable music person on this board. If there are 2,000 logins to this board, I am number 2,000 in terms of my music knowledge and/or acumen.
Two things;

1) You can remove music from this statement.
2) You don't rank dead last, as at the very least you are ahead of Phil McCraken

Author:  Douchebag [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 8:42 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Baby McNown wrote:
Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

Disturbed is crap, and so are you.

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Furious Styles wrote:
I would have gone with the traditional English ballad "Sandwich Fair."


Already been done... :D

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcwQlGjNqrs

Author:  Tad Queasy [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

I did not like that version of the song. It seemed lame and sterile to me.

The official video, if you haven't seen it, is very cheesy: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u9Dg-g7t2l4

Some of the comments about the video:
He sings so angrily but yet so beautifully

You can hear the pain in his voice. It is so beautiful.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Tad Queasy wrote:
He sings so angrily but yet so beautifully

You can hear the pain in his voice.

That's not singing; that's someone that needs some Metamucil.

Author:  Hockey Gay [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 4:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Both suck

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

FavreFan wrote:
Shoulda gone with The Boxer


This is correct.

Author:  IMU [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Does Megan by Bayside count (as one of the good covers)? Might be cheating since Josh Caterer of The Smoking Popes sings a verse.

Author:  Baby McNown [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Douchebag wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

Disturbed is crap, and so are you.

So, when you swallow a cock, how does it taste?

Author:  Hank Scorpio [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Baby McNown wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

Disturbed is crap, and so are you.

So, when you swallow a cock, how does it taste?

I don't think you swallow the cock. Did you mean the semen or did you mean when he puts the cock in his mouth? Are you aware of the mechanics of oral sex?

Author:  leashyourkids [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

Disturbed is crap, and so are you.

So, when you swallow a cock, how does it taste?

I don't think you swallow the cock. Did you mean the semen or did you mean when he puts the cock in his mouth? Are you aware of the mechanics of oral sex?


:lol:

Author:  Baby McNown [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 7:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Hank Scorpio wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Douchebag wrote:
Baby McNown wrote:
Predictable? Yes. Over produced? Yes. But it's not crap.

Disturbed is crap, and so are you.

So, when you swallow a cock, how does it taste?

I don't think you swallow the cock. Did you mean the semen or did you mean when he puts the cock in his mouth? Are you aware of the mechanics of oral sex?

Oh he swallows it. Sword swallower. He had a circus freak teach him how.

Author:  Telegram Sam [ Thu Aug 25, 2016 11:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

I miss SHARK.

Author:  beni hanna [ Fri Aug 26, 2016 12:04 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Seriously?

Telegram Sam wrote:
I miss SHARK.

+fin

Page 1 of 2 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/