They were both very good apostles. I'll have to go with Paul. He wrote Ephesians, Romans, Corinthians, and Thessalonians. John only wrote the "Johns" and Revelations. Paul's body of work was far more extensive.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| John or Paul? https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=11853 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Sun May 13, 2007 2:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | John or Paul? |
Spun off from the thread in the Boers & Bernstein folder. George Harrison is awesome, but not germane to the argument. |
|
| Author: | Mustang Rob [ Mon May 14, 2007 10:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I voted JPII |
|
| Author: | The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon May 14, 2007 10:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
They were both very good apostles. I'll have to go with Paul. He wrote Ephesians, Romans, Corinthians, and Thessalonians. John only wrote the "Johns" and Revelations. Paul's body of work was far more extensive.
|
|
| Author: | Soup Fan Anthony [ Mon May 14, 2007 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: John or Paul? |
Quote: George Harrison is awesome, but not germane to the argument.
Why, because he was clearly the best Beatle? |
|
| Author: | Fixed Glee [ Mon May 21, 2007 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Paul |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|