It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 6:36 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
WWE News: Chris Jericho explains why the girl appeared in his reintroduction videos, who came up with the idea of him remaining silent during his return appearances

May 21, 2012 - 10:30 AM

WWE star Chris Jericho told the UK Sun that fans were looking too deep into his reintroduction videos. "They were looking too deep into it —WAY too deep," Jericho said. "It was just supposed to be a creepy thing. My idea was that it was the Mayan calendar in 2012 saying it’s the end of the world and I was going back and it’s the ‘end of the world as you know it.’

"That means that if one day you are walking down the street and you find a dog, and then the dog lives in your house, then it's the ‘end of the world as you know it.’ It’s the end of the way that you used to live and it’s a new world.

"The girl we just put in because she was creepy looking. There was never supposed to be a girl coming in with me —there wasn’t a change of plan. It was exactly what it was intended to be —a cryptic little cool thing that led to me coming back and doing what I did."

Jericho also revealed who came up with the idea of him not talking during his initial appearances. "That part was Vince’s (McMahon) idea," Jericho said. "He was the one that suggested that and I thought it was great. I like to do something different that people don’t expect. That’s what I’ve always been about, in everything I do." You can read more interview highlights and find a link to a SunSport podcast interview at Thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/wrestling/4330059/Chris-Jericho-lifts-the-lid-on-his-feud-with-CM-Punk-FozzyWWE.html.

Powell's POV: I think fans had every right to expect a payoff to aspects of the reintroduction videos. I wouldn't feel that way with most WWE videos, but fans have come to expect more from Jericho than the girl being added because she was creepy looking. Jericho also said he came back to WWE to work with C.M. Punk and pitched the idea to Vince McMahon in August 2011. He also discussed Fozzy's upcoming UK show dates.



Blame the audience.

Does Kenny Williams run WWE now?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 12:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park
Keeping Score is so embarassed he hasn't posted in a month :P

_________________
Bobby Heenan wrote:
Oh...Eastern Illinois. They contacted me. I didn't take the entrance exam because I had 64 crayons instead of 3. But I loved going through Central Illinois. Watching people on bad cooked up Tide is the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
jackref wrote:
Keeping Score is so embarassed he hasn't posted in a month :P


Great, ain't it?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
WWE releases "Top 50 WCW stars" list

May 21, 2012 - 5:50:18 PM

CLICK TO EMAIL ARTICLE... OR SPREAD THE WORD BELOW...

By James Caldwell, PWTorch assistant editor

WWE has released a new "list," this one covering the "Top 50 WCW Superstars." WWE noted the list only covers WCW's Ted Turner era from 1988 to 2001, only counts a wrestler's accomplishments in WCW, and is based on "everything from longevity to cultural impact." WWE announcer Jim Ross tweeted about his contribution: "I only wrote 2 bios...Terry Funk and Brian Pillman...I had zero to do w/the rankings...Interesting list."


WWE's 1-50 list:
(1) Sting
(2) Ric Flair
(3) "Hollywood" Hulk Hogan
(4) Goldberg
(5) Kevin Nash
(6) Diamond Dallas Page
(7) Lex Luger
(8) Booker T
(9) "Macho Man" Randy Savage
(10) Scott Steiner
(11) Big Van Vader
(12) Scott Hall
(13) Dean Malenko
(14) "Psycho" Sid Vicious
(15) "Stunning" Steve Austin
(16) Ron Simmons
(17) Arn Anderson
(18) Eddie Guerrero
(19) The Giant (Big Show)
(20) Brian Pillman
(21) Rick Steiner
(22) Rey Mysterio
(23) Barry Windham
(24) Ricky "The Dragon" Steamboat
(25) Eric Bischoff
(26) Rick Rude
(27) Chris Jericho
(28) Buff Bagwell
(29) Billy Kidman
(30) Raven
(31) The Great Muta
(32) Lance Storm
(33) Terry Funk
(34) Konnan
(35) Lord Steven Regal (William Regal)
(36) Ultimo Dragon
(37) Cactus Jack (Mick Foley)
(38) Michael "P.S." Hayes
(39) Curt Hennig
(40) "Taskmaster" Kevin Sullivan
(41) Bret Hart
(42) Dustin Rhodes (Goldust in WWE)
(43) Saturn
(44) Bobby Eaton
(45) Kanyon
(46) Larry Zbyszko
(47) Meng
(48) Dennis Rodman
(49) Juventud Guerrera
(50) Jeff Jarrett


Yikes. This is pretty bad

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Any list with Kevin Nash in the top 10 is a farce.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 6:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
Arn at 17 and Steamboat at 24 are the ones that stand out upon first glance.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 7:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Arn at 17 and Steamboat at 24 are the ones that stand out upon first glance.


What about Rodman?

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
WWE News: Stephanie defends Raw to three hours, is she returning to TV?, talks surprises at Raw #1,000 & Rock's return

May 21, 2012 - 5:04:34 PM

By James Caldwell, PWTorch assistant editor


WWE executive Stephanie McMahon talked to IGN.com's Eric Goldman about Raw changing to three hours starting July 23. The following are highlights.

-- As part of the "interactive elements" added to Raw, Stephanie said the audience will vote on "different things every week" to affect the show.

-- Stephanie said the 1,000th Raw (actual #999) starting the three-hour Raws will feature old stars returning to mix with new stars on the roster. Asked if she will be returning to TV, Stephanie said, "Who knows? Maybe you’ve got to tune into the 1000th Raw on July 23!”

Asked when The Rock will return and/or have a return match, Stephanie said, "Hmm, I think I’m gonna have to let that one unfold!”

-- Stephanie gave the marketing department sales pitch for why Raw is moving to three hours: “It’s going to be the first-ever regularly scheduled three-hour program on television and I think we’ve got a pretty good handle on it thus far! You know, we do a three-hour show called a Pay-Per-View almost every month and Monday Night Raw, we’ve done three hours before, so we feel great about it."

Link: Full story at IGN.com .

Caldwell's Analysis: There are some really, really good reasons why executives in the TV industry have not scheduled three-hour, non-sporting event shows. (a) You lose the audience asking them to sit through a three-hour drama/comedy/variety show once-a-week. (b) It would burn out the audience very quickly by throwing everything at viewers and leaving them with nothing to anticipate.

As for Stephanie's comments on WWE already having practice with PPVs and three-hour specials, there's a reason why they're special events and not weekly-occurring events. Over the Limit Sunday night showed why WWE should cut back on PPV events - it didn't feel like a PPV-worthy special event and watered down the entire PPV concept - in order to re-establish the specialness of the events. With Raw, WWE is pushing forward with too much supply when the demand simply is not there for a three-hour Raw. Soon enough, having a three-hour Raw every week will water down the flagship show and WWE will eventually lose viewers asking them to sit through a three-hour show every Monday night when they were perfectly content watching a two-hour show

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
Terry's Peeps wrote:
-- Stephanie said the 1,000th Raw (actual #999) starting the three-hour Raws will feature old stars returning to mix with new stars on the roster. Asked if she will be returning to TV, Stephanie said, "Who knows? Maybe you’ve got to tune into the 1000th Raw on July 23!”

Asked when The Rock will return and/or have a return match, Stephanie said, "Hmm, I think I’m gonna have to let that one unfold!”

Good answers, Steph.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I actually feel bad for Keeping Score at this point.

He had so much hope and faith in Creative. It's a shame he has been forsaken by the E.

Come back Con!

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 3:49 pm
Posts: 9340
Location: UM?
pizza_Place: Aurelios
Terry's Peeps wrote:
WWE News: Stephanie defends Raw to three hours, is she returning to TV?, talks surprises at Raw #1,000 & Rock's return

May 21, 2012 - 5:04:34 PM

By James Caldwell, PWTorch assistant editor


WWE executive Stephanie McMahon talked to IGN.com's Eric Goldman about Raw changing to three hours starting July 23. The following are highlights.

-- As part of the "interactive elements" added to Raw, Stephanie said the audience will vote on "different things every week" to affect the show.

-- Stephanie said the 1,000th Raw (actual #999) starting the three-hour Raws will feature old stars returning to mix with new stars on the roster. Asked if she will be returning to TV, Stephanie said, "Who knows? Maybe you’ve got to tune into the 1000th Raw on July 23!”

Asked when The Rock will return and/or have a return match, Stephanie said, "Hmm, I think I’m gonna have to let that one unfold!”

-- Stephanie gave the marketing department sales pitch for why Raw is moving to three hours: “It’s going to be the first-ever regularly scheduled three-hour program on television and I think we’ve got a pretty good handle on it thus far! You know, we do a three-hour show called a Pay-Per-View almost every month and Monday Night Raw, we’ve done three hours before, so we feel great about it."

Link: Full story at IGN.com .

Caldwell's Analysis: There are some really, really good reasons why executives in the TV industry have not scheduled three-hour, non-sporting event shows. (a) You lose the audience asking them to sit through a three-hour drama/comedy/variety show once-a-week. (b) It would burn out the audience very quickly by throwing everything at viewers and leaving them with nothing to anticipate.

As for Stephanie's comments on WWE already having practice with PPVs and three-hour specials, there's a reason why they're special events and not weekly-occurring events. Over the Limit Sunday night showed why WWE should cut back on PPV events - it didn't feel like a PPV-worthy special event and watered down the entire PPV concept - in order to re-establish the specialness of the events. With Raw, WWE is pushing forward with too much supply when the demand simply is not there for a three-hour Raw. Soon enough, having a three-hour Raw every week will water down the flagship show and WWE will eventually lose viewers asking them to sit through a three-hour show every Monday night when they were perfectly content watching a two-hour show



It's going to fail and fail big time. It's a really really bad idea. I like when Raw is a 3 hour show for bigger events, but I just really can't see it every week.

_________________
Hank Scorpio wrote:
What the hell, I would. Post op is OK right? Right?!?!?!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park
Are they planning on dropping Smackdown? If so I could see it possibly working by having one roster and no more split brand stupidity. Bringing back the tag division will help too. Or having the first hour give time for the younger guys to get over and heck maybe even having some job matches!

_________________
Bobby Heenan wrote:
Oh...Eastern Illinois. They contacted me. I didn't take the entrance exam because I had 64 crayons instead of 3. But I loved going through Central Illinois. Watching people on bad cooked up Tide is the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
I have zero faith any of that will happen.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
So let's fix Raw by having job matches?

No thanks.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park
RFDC wrote:
So let's fix Raw by having job matches?

No thanks.


Why not, get guys over and actually have clean finishes. Serves a purpose.

_________________
Bobby Heenan wrote:
Oh...Eastern Illinois. They contacted me. I didn't take the entrance exam because I had 64 crayons instead of 3. But I loved going through Central Illinois. Watching people on bad cooked up Tide is the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
jackref wrote:
RFDC wrote:
So let's fix Raw by having job matches?

No thanks.


Why not, get guys over and actually have clean finishes. Serves a purpose.


I guarantee if they went this direction two weeks into the deal most everyone here would be bitching that this is such an awful idea by the E.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
They can't go back to those days, even though it'd probably be the best thing for them.

Ralphus is right. Fans would shit all over it.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 2:10 pm
Posts: 3770
Location: NW Burbs
pizza_Place: Old World Pizza in Melrose Park
It wouldnt be every match :lol: But jobbers serve a purpose and if you are going 3 hours a night you need matches that get guys over without having them in a feud or have a match end in DQ or countout or interference.

I know it won't happen in today's wrestling but it should! :D

_________________
Bobby Heenan wrote:
Oh...Eastern Illinois. They contacted me. I didn't take the entrance exam because I had 64 crayons instead of 3. But I loved going through Central Illinois. Watching people on bad cooked up Tide is the best.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 21, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
PWTorch readers have pointed out that included in WWE's new "Revolution" web video released Monday is a close-up shot of who appears to be current TNA wrestler Matt Morgan. As reported earlier this month, Morgan has near "free agent" status due to TNA using up his contracted dates. Assuming it is Morgan in the video, WWE is able to loosely reference a non-contracted talent since they own footage from his career, similar to WWE teasing Sting potentially joining the company in the 2-21-11 videos last year when he was in-between TNA contracts.

Image


Matt Morgan do anything for ya?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:40 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2010 1:30 am
Posts: 4113
pizza_Place: Palermo's 95th
No Way Out ad: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gqNROeODBPY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 1:28 pm
Posts: 315
Location: Southside of Chicago
pizza_Place: Italian Fiesta
Even though I was more a WWF guy, I hate the way they shit on and rewrite WCW history. There's no way Ricky Steamboat and Rick Rude should be that low on the list.

_________________
If you don't judge my do-rag, I won't judge your red flag


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:02 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17980
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Unify the WWE/World Heavyweight belts. For the love of jeebus.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43566
Terry's Peeps wrote:
Arn at 17 and Steamboat at 24 are the ones that stand out upon first glance.

I love how they put Jeff Jarrett at #50.

That decision had to come directly from Vince. :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 04, 2006 1:39 am
Posts: 13303
pizza_Place: Lanny Poffo's Sausage and More
I just realized the top four matches at Mania could be:

Taker v Lesnar
Cena v Rock
Austin v Punk
Michaels v Hunter w/ Flair as special ref

:shock:

_________________
Telegram Sam wrote:
I would cover for SHARK, Drop In, Dave in Champaign, my Mom, and Urlacher's Missing Neck. After that, the list gets pretty thin. There are a few people about whom I would definitely fabricate charges.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2005 1:01 pm
Posts: 7331
Location: County Seat of LaSalle County
pizza_Place: Bianchi's - Ottawa
Terry's Peeps wrote:
PWTorch readers have pointed out that included in WWE's new "Revolution" web video released Monday is a close-up shot of who appears to be current TNA wrestler Matt Morgan. As reported earlier this month, Morgan has near "free agent" status due to TNA using up his contracted dates. Assuming it is Morgan in the video, WWE is able to loosely reference a non-contracted talent since they own footage from his career, similar to WWE teasing Sting potentially joining the company in the 2-21-11 videos last year when he was in-between TNA contracts.

Image


Matt Morgan do anything for ya?


Fuck no! He's as charasmatic as a cardboard cutout. Is Nathan Jones coming too. Team Lesnar V. 2.0?

I've heard some good things about Dean Ambrose in developmental. I thought it might be him.

_________________
"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public." ~ H.L. Mencken


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Quote:
Stephanie gave the marketing department sales pitch for why Raw is moving to three hours: “It’s going to be the first-ever regularly scheduled three-hour program on television


Wow, do the McMahons know how to lie or what.Fucking Nitro was a three hour show for over 3 years,lol. Man thank the Lord I am poor and do not still have stock in this outfit.

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57230
It was 2 years, but who is counting.

Nitro never existed in the McMahons world. They have that blocked out.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 6:05 pm
Posts: 68612
pizza_Place: Lina's Pizza
RFDC wrote:
It was 2 years, but who is counting.

Nitro never existed in the McMahons world. They have that blocked out.


Except when they can make $$$.

Image

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
There is not a damned thing wrong with people who are bull shitters.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 7:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 3:58 pm
Posts: 3895
Location: Ninjas
pizza_Place: Perry's Deli Home of the Swaggie
Hearing today that Flair, Shelley and Sabin have asked for and been granted releases from tna.

_________________
Drop In wrote:
I'm picturing a 12 year old Bob Loblaw bitching out a Randy Savage Wrestling Buddy for botching his finisher. Also envisioning Bob Loblaw getting bitched at for lighting the living room table on fire for said finisher.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 22, 2012 7:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 09, 2008 3:18 pm
Posts: 19487
pizza_Place: Phils' on 35th all you need to know
Quote:
- PWInsider reports that Ric Flair and TNA are at a major impasse and there is a ton of heat on Flair for his conduct outside of the ring. One source described it as "being at the point it's not worth keeping Flair around."

There have been a number of incidents with Flair at local establishments in Orlando since he joined TNA. Flair was reportedly banned from drinking at the Hard Rock Cafe at Citiwalk due to an incident.

There also have been many stories about Flair not being able to cover bar tabs and company management getting calls from hotel or bar management seeking payment. Something similar recently happened at a hotel TNA has a good relationship with and that was said to be the final tipping point. Flair was pulled from live events and TV tapings after that incident.

Several people in the company have been against using him as a regular since he came to TNA, noting that while he carries a high price tag, he hasn't drew money or ratings for TNA.

Spike TV sources also report that there have been a number of requests from the network for TNA to keep Flair dressed and not have him "near nude" and bleeding at his age on TV.

Word going around over the weekend was that Flair is done with TNA but that's not confirmed yet.


Credit Prowrestling.com

_________________
When I am stuck and need to figure something out I always remember the Immortal words of Socrates when he said:"I just drank what?"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group