| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=73163 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 4:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Here is the Card Tara vs Knockouts Champ Miss Tessmacher No title change Sonja Dutt vs X-Division Champ Zema Ion. Ion retains Magnus vs Rob Van Dam. Who cares A.J.&Angle vs Tag Team Champs Daniels & Kazarian No title change ,possible DQ. Also Angel is rumored to be hurt so we might have AJ team with someone else. Bully Ray vs James Storm. Storm,Match of the night Hardy vs Joe Joe wins moving on Austin Ares vs Aces and Eights guy(Luke Gallows) Aries goes off on him Joe vs Storm in the Finals. Storm for the win |
|
| Author: | SomeGuy [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: Hardy beat Joe. Why? Because Hardy was the better man in the squared circle. He also pinned him. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: Hardy beat Joe. Why? Joe and Magnus are gonna do business. |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
I'm sure we'll get some answer tonight, but Luke Gallows can't be the Aces and Eights payoff. Roode would make sense, as he really only got a DDT early in the story. Easily explained. I'd rather it's not Jarrett. Perhaps it's Ra's al Rhul's daughter? My guess is Hardy wins the whole thing, and you have a face v face at Bound for Glory. I think they'd LOVE to put the title back on him. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: Drop In wrote: I'm sure we'll get some answer tonight, but Luke Gallows can't be the Aces and Eights payoff. Roode would make sense, as he really only got a DDT early in the story. Easily explained. I'd rather it's not Jarrett. Perhaps it's Ra's al Rhul's daughter? My guess is Hardy wins the whole thing, and you have a face v face at Bound for Glory. I think they'd LOVE to put the title back on him. Are you cool with Hardy getting the belt again at any point? Or is that insane? No I would not put it on him unless it was a short time deal,less than 2 months. I would also do Tara,multiple times. I was just thinking,how awful must Morrison and Melinas reputation be that TNA will not hire them? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Drop In wrote: I'm sure we'll get some answer tonight, but Luke Gallows can't be the Aces and Eights payoff. Roode would make sense, as he really only got a DDT early in the story. Easily explained. I'd rather it's not Jarrett. Perhaps it's Ra's al Rhul's daughter? My guess is Hardy wins the whole thing, and you have a face v face at Bound for Glory. I think they'd LOVE to put the title back on him. Gallows and Masters will be the initial two reveals. It'll be JJ revealed as the mastermind at Bound for Glory. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Do they make it a 3 way dance for the final now? |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Terry's Peeps wrote: Drop In wrote: I'm sure we'll get some answer tonight, but Luke Gallows can't be the Aces and Eights payoff. Roode would make sense, as he really only got a DDT early in the story. Easily explained. I'd rather it's not Jarrett. Perhaps it's Ra's al Rhul's daughter? My guess is Hardy wins the whole thing, and you have a face v face at Bound for Glory. I think they'd LOVE to put the title back on him. Gallows and Masters will be the initial two reveals. It'll be JJ revealed as the mastermind at Bound for Glory. That's what I mean. Does absolutely nothing for me. Why are they trying to destroy TNA? Because they were released by WWE? Jarrett went and got guys that weren't quite good enough to be in WWE to take over TNA? I would put the belt on Hardy. He's their most bankable star. One more strike, and he's done whether he has the belt or not. |
|
| Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
I'm thinking it'll be Eric Bischoff as the man behind Aces and 8s |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
How about a total mind fuck and it being Morgan? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Morgan isn't a crazy idea. With his "cryptic" tweets, I could see it. Gallows and Masters, among others, could be put over as talented guys the WWE Champion like but were fired because the didn't want to be entertainers, they wanted to be wrestlers. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: I think Mike Knox is behind the whole thing. Or maybe Heidenreich. It's Kevin Steen and Steve Corino. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
You are both wrong,it is Test and Mike Awesome. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: What does A's & 8's even mean? Is that a poker term? Dead man's hand. Supposedly Wild Bill Hickock had the hand when he was gunned down |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
I just noticed, why the fuck isn't Marvell suing TNA for copyright infringement? |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
chaspoppcap wrote: I just noticed, why the fuck isn't Marvell suing TNA for copyright infringement? For what? |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 8:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Terry's Peeps wrote: chaspoppcap wrote: I just noticed, why the fuck isn't Marvell suing TNA for copyright infringement? For what? Hell yeah that is just plain blatant. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Halle looks good no matter what. SES chick meh,kinda. I am a dirty old man and I would not even do Cyrus with Drop ins dogs cock. |
|
| Author: | chaspoppcap [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Aw hell no. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Sep 09, 2012 9:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Keeping Score wrote: Terry's Peeps wrote: chaspoppcap wrote: I just noticed, why the fuck isn't Marvell suing TNA for copyright infringement? For what? Captain America logo Shit I didn't even think of that. |
|
| Author: | reents [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
Listening to the Law, they made it sound like this was a bad PPV. |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Sep 10, 2012 12:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: TNA: No Surrender Tonight 7PM |
reents wrote: Listening to the Law, they made it sound like this was a bad PPV. It was. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|