Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
RAW v BEARS https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=74935 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | RAW v BEARS |
Bad wrestling or bad football? What will it be? Hopefully they open the show with the new guys, as it won't have my attention once Gruden strikes his pose. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Punk and Heyman deny that they're associated with the NXT guys. |
Author: | sinicalypse [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Oh yeah, wasn't there a PPV last night? I haven't paid much attention since they're giving us PUNK VS CENA 7--- THIS TIME IT *REALLY* MEANS SOMETHING!!! |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:17 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I'll watch the first half hour until the Bears game and then probably try and catch up during halftime. Semi interested unless they just decide to ignore the new guys and just let them go on there own. |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Chris_in_joliet wrote: I'll watch the first half hour until the Bears game and then probably try and catch up during halftime. Semi interested unless they just decide to ignore the new guys and just let them go on there own. I know this doesn't mean much since we're dealing with WWE, but they have been holding at least 2 of the 3 back to have a good debut. I don't think they'll bail on it. I could see a deal where Heyman and Punk deny being with the group for a month, and help Punk win at TLC. Ambrose will be the talker for the group. That said, I expect Rollins to choke an announcer with a tie at 7:45, the Samoan to tear a triceps at 8:45, and Ambrose to be sent back down at 10:15. |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 5:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
The will come out early during someones match and interfere and then vanish. Punk and Heyman will deny any relationship with them. Cena, Punk and the neanderthal will be part of some stupid 6 man tag match. Big Show will continue to get no reaction at all yet will still be on the air. Sandow and Cody will be awesome....as always. |
Author: | donspiracy [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:06 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Tubsai v. Ryback, piss break match already?? |
Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Ryback speaks?? Tensai has lost part of his name, his entrance outfit and his manager now. |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Urlacher's missing neck wrote: Ryback speaks?? Tensai has lost part of his name, his entrance outfit and his manager now. Just wait until they take away his tattoo marker and body razor. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Heel Ziggler ripping apart AJ and then spearing Cena through the bathroom stalls (that totally weren't staged to fall). Josh Mathews might have the worst haircut I've ever seen for a man his age. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
BALLOONS |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:39 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
BALLOONS!!! BALLOONS!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU AND FUCK THE BEARS. |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I'm amazed Tamina Snuka is still around after he dropped The Undertaker at Wrestlemania a few years back. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Drop In wrote: I'm amazed Tamina Snuka is still around after he dropped The Undertaker at Wrestlemania a few years back. |
Author: | donspiracy [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Drop In wrote: BALLOONS!!! BALLOONS!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU AND FUCK THE BEARS. What did I miss?? |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
donspiracy wrote: Drop In wrote: BALLOONS!!! BALLOONS!!!!!!!!!!! FUCK YOU AND FUCK THE BEARS. What did I miss?? BALLOONS |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Is it going to be BYOB at Punk's little party? |
Author: | donspiracy [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 10:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
This is when Dwayne comes back right?? |
Author: | Drop In [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I'm going to make a non-obnoxious "I'm a Paul Heyman Guy" shirt. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Paul Heyman is God. |
Author: | Don Tiny [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 12:12 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Drop In wrote: I'm going to make a non-obnoxious "I'm a Paul Heyman Guy" shirt. It should be nicely embroidered on a polo shirt, right above where the pocket might (or might not) be. |
Author: | jackref [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Hard to say what the bigger train wreck was between these two "events". I was able to watch 3 hours of crappy wrestling in about 35 minutes via DVR. I wish I could have done the same with the Bears game. Ryback is the drizzling shits. He has zero depth to his character and gives people no reason to really want to "like" him. And after Tensai landed some good offense he didn't even give him a 1 count. That can't have gone over well backstage. The whole Vicki accusing Cena/AJ affair angle is just uncomfortable. And the beatdown to end the show had some of the shittiest camera work. It was like watching a fight scene in a Bourne movie with all the quick cuts and unsteady cam action. Works in a movie, not for a live event like that. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I'm pretty sure the camera work was done like that to convey to the viewer that this wasn't supposed to happen and they were all harried. It was similar to the Nexus debut. |
Author: | jackref [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 8:57 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
Terry's Peeps wrote: I'm pretty sure the camera work was done like that to convey to the viewer that this wasn't supposed to happen and they were all harried. It was similar to the Nexus debut. I mean I know we are dumb for watching - but not that "dumb"... right? |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:01 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
But the program isn't geared towards us. It's geared toward the fan who doesn't know anything. |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:34 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I think it was a decent show. I kind of skipped over the Big Show segment, although it seemed as if they kept on stumbling over one another trying to talk which I found funny. The Primetime Players on commentary during the Team Hell No/Little Mexicans match was pretty entertaining. The stuff with Paul Heyman all night was brilliant. I'm so glad that man has returned as he's just GOLD. Dolph Ziggler should be the champ on Smackdown and probably will be by the time Wrestlemania rolls around or at least he should be. I'm hoping Cena does the right thing and continues to get him over as Dolph can make Cena more money down the line as the guy knows how to work and work the crowd. I actually found more to like about the show then dislike which is all I ask for. |
Author: | chaspoppcap [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
I loved Hyman's promo about attitude and ECW |
Author: | donspiracy [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
chaspoppcap wrote: I loved Hyman's promo about attitude and ECW Heyman you ignorant waste. |
Author: | chaspoppcap [ Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: RAW v BEARS |
donspiracy wrote: chaspoppcap wrote: I loved Hyman's promo about attitude and ECW Heyman you ignorant waste. crap sorry |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |