Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Heck in a Cell https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=88&t=96888 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 7:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Heck in a Cell |
So there was a return to open the show and answer the US Open Challenge. I won't spoil it for you. |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:44 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
Good show. Taker/Lesnar: very good with old school blading and "violence" Charlotte/Nikki: Above average; Nikki taking the bump from the corner was good. Cena's opponent was a nice surprise. Having no Xavier hurt the tag team match a bit. Pre-show 6 man tag match was very entertaining. Rollins/Kane was average; nothing exceeded expectations. |
Author: | newper [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
Not to steal the thread or anything, but is there any concern about the TV ratings for WWE reaching the lowest levels of modern memory -- they are going to struggle to get a 2 share during the holidays. |
Author: | RFDC [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
I loved Taker and Lesnar. Great match. Del Rio back is meh for me. Never been a big fan. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
I thought show was average-to-below average. I have no interest in the new US Champ. New Day winning was good but I did miss Xavier. Taker-Brock was the match of the show. Also interested if the post match angle goes anywhere. |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
newper wrote: Not to steal the thread or anything, but is there any concern about the TV ratings for WWE reaching the lowest levels of modern memory -- they are going to struggle to get a 2 share during the holidays. Yes there is. With Orton out with a shoulder injury and Cena gone until Christmas, two of their top babyfaces are off tv for a while. Wonder if they use Taker more on tv and push Ambrose to the upper level of babyfaces. The three hours of Raw really hurt them; there is a significant drop in interest from the crowd and ratings by the time it gets to the third hour. |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:00 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
Terry's Peeps wrote: I thought show was average-to-below average. I have no interest in the new US Champ. New Day winning was good but I did miss Xavier. Taker-Brock was the match of the show. Also interested if the post match angle goes anywhere. Either a singles match between Taker and "" or a classic Survivor Series tag match between Taker's guys and the other faction |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:03 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
RFDC wrote: I loved Taker and Lesnar. Great match. Del Rio back is meh for me. Never been a big fan. Great match to end the feud; both Summerslam and tonight's matches were better than their WM30 encounter. Saw a couple of chair shots to the head and blading; something the rest of the roster is probably forbidden to do. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
I really want an old school angle. Brainwashing Taker and turning him evil. |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
Terry's Peeps wrote: I really want an old school angle. Brainwashing Taker and turning him evil. Tried that already with Bryan in fall of 2013. Taker not turning heel; crowd won't allow it. |
Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
I remember. They rushed through it. I want a full 2 months of vignettes with Taker being brainwashed. Sister Abigail comes in and convinces Taker she's his wife. All kinds of weird shit. I want it all. |
Author: | FrankDrebin [ Sun Oct 25, 2015 11:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
http://www2.tsn.ca/toronto/listen/ Talking about HIAC and other wrestling/MMA stories until 1am Chicago time. |
Author: | newper [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:43 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
FrankDrebin wrote: newper wrote: Not to steal the thread or anything, but is there any concern about the TV ratings for WWE reaching the lowest levels of modern memory -- they are going to struggle to get a 2 share during the holidays. Yes there is. With Orton out with a shoulder injury and Cena gone until Christmas, two of their top babyfaces are off tv for a while. Wonder if they use Taker more on tv and push Ambrose to the upper level of babyfaces. The three hours of Raw really hurt them; there is a significant drop in interest from the crowd and ratings by the time it gets to the third hour. Back to two hours would help for sure. A 2 is still better than what USA would get otherwise, but I don't sense a jump back to the 6 days. |
Author: | Hockey Gay [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:32 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Heck in a Cell |
I had to do hard time spending time with my woman's family and didn't get home until Rollins and Kane started. Rollins is the best. It's just remarkable. I hope he is the champ for the next 5 years. Taker vs Lesnar was okay, I guess. Certainly not as good as their Summerslam match, IMO. What's with the blading though? I thought they're not allowed to do that anymore in the WWE. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |