It is currently Sat Nov 16, 2024 1:55 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 ... 325  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30284
Nas wrote:
Vegan was the one who accurately informed Packers fans that they would have beaten the Buccaneers and won a Super Bowl if they drafted Higgins instead of Love. Vegan pointed out how important keeping the best WR in football would be. Vegan is the guy who has pointed out the countless ways Gute has mismanaged the Packers championship window. Maybe Packers fans should listen to Vegan. Gute should give him a call.

Why are Packers fans so arrogant and stubborn?

Be better

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:46 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Vegan was the one who accurately informed Packers fans that they would have beaten the Buccaneers and won a Super Bowl if they drafted Higgins instead of Love. Vegan pointed out how important keeping the best WR in football would be. Vegan is the guy who has pointed out the countless ways Gute has mismanaged the Packers championship window. Maybe Packers fans should listen to Vegan. Gute should give him a call.

Why are Packers fans so arrogant and stubborn?

Be better


To bad Packers fans haven't demanded that of Gute.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30284
Tall Midget wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Nas wrote:
Vegan was the one who accurately informed Packers fans that they would have beaten the Buccaneers and won a Super Bowl if they drafted Higgins instead of Love. Vegan pointed out how important keeping the best WR in football would be. Vegan is the guy who has pointed out the countless ways Gute has mismanaged the Packers championship window. Maybe Packers fans should listen to Vegan. Gute should give him a call.

Why are Packers fans so arrogant and stubborn?

Be better


To bad Packers fans haven't demanded that of Gute.

We are about to find out about Gute a little.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:20 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Vegan was the one who accurately informed Packers fans that they would have beaten the Buccaneers and won a Super Bowl if they drafted Higgins instead of Love=

This is the type of incoherent rambling I am talking about. No need to join him. I don't know why you and vegan think assigning hypothetical super bowls in alternate realities helps your arguments.

The rest of your post like the Adams stuff has already been debunked in this thread.


You don't think Higgins would have improved the Packers chances of beating the Buccaneers and a handicapped Mahomes, but Vegan and I are the problem. On second thought, the brain has a way of blocking traumatic events.

We literally had a Packers fan say the Packers would be better without Adams. That Rodgers and the offense was better without him. Out of the kindness of our hearts, we tried to tell you all that wasn't true..

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 4:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Nas wrote:
Vegan was the one who accurately informed Packers fans that they would have beaten the Buccaneers and won a Super Bowl if they drafted Higgins instead of Love=

This is the type of incoherent rambling I am talking about. No need to join him. I don't know why you and vegan think assigning hypothetical super bowls in alternate realities helps your arguments.

The rest of your post like the Adams stuff has already been debunked in this thread.


You don't think Higgins would have improved the Packers chances of beating the Buccaneers and a handicapped Mahomes, but Vegan and I are the problem. On second thought, the brain has a way of blocking traumatic events.

We literally had a Packers fan say the Packers would be better without Adams. That Rodgers and the offense was better without him. Out of the kindness of our hearts, we tried to tell you all that wasn't true..

Of course the offense wasn't going to be better without Adams, anyone who said otherwise was being dumb. It wasn't me.

Maybe they would have won with Higgins or maybe LeFleur would still decide to kick a fg when a td was needed or maybe rodgers would still come up short. Maybe they would have won it all. Who knwos. It's hard to win a SB, it's silly to declare winners in alternate hypothetical universes.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 4:40 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38266
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.


So the Pack should have gotten rid of Rodgers three years ago, and not Adams last year.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Seacrest wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.


So the Pack should have gotten rid of Rodgers three years ago, and not Adams last year.


They should have told Rodgers to eat shit when he threw his tantrum a few years ago. They would have gotten an insane haul for him and despite the MVPs he was a massive playoff failure those two years. Who knows how that situation would have played out if they didn't get down on two knees for him like they did. Ideally Rodgers would have checked his damn ego at the door and run the offense like Brady would have. In hindsight yes they should have gotten rid of Rodgers. He didn't win a Super Bowl those years doing it his way. I wish he would have played out his contract and quietly worked out some kind of extension while also leaving money for Adams and I wish he would have worked within the offense more instead of calling plays at the line to get Adams in a matchup he liked and forcing it to him.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 23760
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.


Good job not hitting a wall in the playoffs last year.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 6:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
KDdidit wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.


Good job not hitting a wall in the playoffs last year.


Thankfully he mailed it in last year and it led to his departure before they were in 5 years of cap hell because of him. He has a 107 mil hit for the Jets next year. Can't wait to see how they work around that.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 7:26 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Scottie ran the Bulls offense perfectly in 93-94. The Bulls won a lot of games. His teammates loved him, and they likely lose to the Rockets in the Finals if the refs don't cheat. That said, I'll always want Michael Jordan on my team.

Adams was/is a Michael Jordan type of receiver. As MANY of us understood, he made Rodgers better. It wasn't the other way around. He was Rodgers safety blanket. The Lions mauled them without him.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 8:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27517
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Adams is now Michael Jordan. This thread has taken many turns but this one is certainly out of the leftest of left fields.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 8:34 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Adams is now Michael Jordan. This thread has taken many turns but this one is certainly out of the leftest of left fields.


He's the best at his position. He's been the best for about 5 years. You preferred this version of Randall Cobb because the offense is ran properly.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 8:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2010 8:04 pm
Posts: 9941
pizza_Place: world famous
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Adams is now Michael Jordan. This thread has taken many turns but this one is certainly out of the leftest of left fields.


He's the best at his position. He's been the best for about 5 years.

Just like Mike!

_________________
Nas wrote:
We lose a lot of rights when we look the other way when it doesn't affect our lives or it isn't a cause we agree with.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Apr 30, 2023 8:52 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Franky T wrote:
Nas wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
Adams is now Michael Jordan. This thread has taken many turns but this one is certainly out of the leftest of left fields.


He's the best at his position. He's been the best for about 5 years.

Just like Mike!


I didn't call him a Tom Brady type. That would have been going too far.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2023 5:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
KDdidit wrote:
Urlacher's missing neck wrote:
My thoughts on Adams leaving are never going to be understood because someone refused to listen to what I was saying and interpreted to fit their packer hating agenda. He is an amazing wr and they were an amazing combination but the offense hit a wall come playoff time because Rodgers would go off script and lock in on him instead of running the offense as it was meant to be run. Just because Adams can beat double coverage does not mean you should always ignore your other receivers and throw to him every single time. The last 2 playoff losses both featured Rodgers forcing him the ball and failing. Rodgers always had well rounded games when Adams was hurt because he had to distribute the ball to everyone and use the open man instead of just forcing it to your guy. Brady would have won both those playoff games IMO Swallow your pride and take what the defense is giving you instead of taking what you want regardless of if its there or not.


Good job not hitting a wall in the playoffs last year.


Thankfully he mailed it in last year and it led to his departure before they were in 5 years of cap hell because of him. He has a 107 mil hit for the Jets next year. Can't wait to see how they work around that.


I've been told by Packers fans that the salary cap is a myth


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2023 8:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
What are the odds that GB picks up Love's 5th year option? I'd say 20% chance they exercise that.

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon May 01, 2023 8:28 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
312player wrote:
What are the odds that GB picks up Love's 5th year option? I'd say 20% chance they exercise that.


I don't think they have a choice. Not picking it up essentially means they're looking to draft his replacement next April. It's also another sign they should have drafted Higgins. You can't say that to Packers though.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 8:56 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30284
Jordon Love new 2 year contract thru 24. 13.5 guaranteed and could earn up to 22.5.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:02 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Hawg Ass wrote:
Jordon Love new 2 year contract thru 24. 13.5 guaranteed and could earn up to 22.5.


It's a 1 year extension that has a base salary that's $7M less than his 5th year option would have given him. Not only do the Packers not believe in him, he doesn't believe in himself. That's encouraging.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
312player wrote:
What are the odds that GB picks up Love's 5th year option? I'd say 20% chance they exercise that.

Technically you were correct...they didn't pick up the 5th yr option.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:12 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


It's only $13M that's guaranteed. That's less than the $21M the 5th year option would cost them.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41375
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


It's only $13M that's guaranteed. That's less than the $21M the 5th year option would cost them.


Luckily the salary cap is a myth!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:15 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Nas wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Jordon Love new 2 year contract thru 24. 13.5 guaranteed and could earn up to 22.5.


It's a 1 year extension that has a base salary that's $7M less than his 5th year option would have given him. Not only do the Packers not believe in him, he doesn't believe in himself. That's encouraging.


TEAM FIRST! He's keeping his cap number low so Gute can bring in more talent--like a new starting quarterback.

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30284
When he plays well this year, 24 will be ripped up and a new contract will be in play.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13242
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


It's only $13M that's guaranteed. That's less than the $21M the 5th year option would cost them.

It's a win-win. The Packers will end up with plenty of cash to spend next season and won't have to deal with repeated questions on the 5th yr option. If Love proves to be decent, he will get an extension commensurate with his skill level.

_________________
“Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.”- JD Vance
“My god, what an !diot.”- JD Vance tweet on Trump
“I’m a ‘Never Trump’ guy”- JD Vance


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:23 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


It's only $13M that's guaranteed. That's less than the $21M the 5th year option would cost them.

It's a win-win. The Packers will end up with plenty of cash to spend next season and won't have to deal with repeated questions on the 5th yr option. If Love proves to be decent, he will get an extension commensurate with his skill level.


Unlikely. The Packers will make him prove it again in 24 and possibly tag him in 2025. It's good business for them. As a player, I wouldn't hedge if I believed in my abilities. I would have told them pick up my 5th year or you'll have to tag me in 2024 after my all pro season.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72378
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nas wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Nas wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
:lol: 22 million for a QB that has proven jack shit


It's only $13M that's guaranteed. That's less than the $21M the 5th year option would cost them.

It's a win-win. The Packers will end up with plenty of cash to spend next season and won't have to deal with repeated questions on the 5th yr option. If Love proves to be decent, he will get an extension commensurate with his skill level.


Unlikely. The Packers will make him prove it again in 24 and possibly tag him in 2025.

Nah. He's on a one year tryout. If he plays decent he gets a huge bag. If he's bad they will move on.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Tue May 02, 2023 9:51 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 12:55 pm
Posts: 29461
pizza_Place: Zaffiro's
Florio is on the Score right now arguing that LaFleur, "quietly one of the best coaches in the NFL," has won a lot of games in spite of Aaron Rodgers (and the tension between Roders and Gute) not because of him. :lol:

_________________
Antonio Gramsci wrote:
The crisis consists precisely in the fact that the old is dying and the new cannot be born; in this interregnum a great variety of morbid symptoms appear.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9727 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 235, 236, 237, 238, 239, 240, 241 ... 325  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 6 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group