It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 6:43 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10063 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333 ... 336  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 16, 2015 1:15 pm
Posts: 41456
Location: Small Fringe Minority
pizza_Place: John's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pro Bowler Rashan Gary, nice ring to it.


6.5 sacks. Montez Sweat numbers. Not much bang for the buck from Rashan "The Contract" Gary.



Oink Oink!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 4:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57614
Caller Bob wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pro Bowler Rashan Gary, nice ring to it.


6.5 sacks. Montez Sweat numbers. Not much bang for the buck from Rashan "The Contract" Gary.



Oink Oink!

Where does Gary fall in their age standings?

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 4:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
RFDC wrote:
Caller Bob wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pro Bowler Rashan Gary, nice ring to it.


6.5 sacks. Montez Sweat numbers. Not much bang for the buck from Rashan "The Contract" Gary.



Oink Oink!

Where does Gary fall in their age standings?

:lol:

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
Caller Bob wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Pro Bowler Rashan Gary, nice ring to it.


6.5 sacks. Montez Sweat numbers. Not much bang for the buck from Rashan "The Contract" Gary.



Oink Oink!

7.5, don’t disrespect a Pro Bowler.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
good dolphin wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Pack going to lose three in a row to close out their year


Yep

Didn’t lose 10 of 11.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65994
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37979
Location: ...
If they were at home against Philly they probably could have a chance but I think the eagles want to shake last year off badly.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24449
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
Does Hurts even remember last year anymore?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 6:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13442
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Darkside wrote:
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

I can’t disagree. It was a very aggravating game to watch. So many dumb mistakes (including a couple by MLF).

I think they can beat the Eagles, but even if they do they aren’t consistent enough to go on a run against good teams so I don’t have any expectations.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

I can’t disagree. It was a very aggravating game to watch. So many dumb mistakes (including a couple by MLF).

I think they can beat the Eagles, but even if they do they aren’t consistent enough to go on a run against good teams so I don’t have any expectations.

That's because the whole team just graduated high school.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Pack going to lose three in a row to close out their year


Yep

Didn’t lose 10 of 11.


1-5 in the division

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
What pick do the Bears get again?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Sun Jan 05, 2025 7:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57614
Brick wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

I can’t disagree. It was a very aggravating game to watch. So many dumb mistakes (including a couple by MLF).

I think they can beat the Eagles, but even if they do they aren’t consistent enough to go on a run against good teams so I don’t have any expectations.

That's because the whole team just graduated high school.

:lol:

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 10:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Aug 25, 2014 11:42 am
Posts: 4805
pizza_Place: Home Run Inn
What's ironic about the game is that the Packers ended up looking more like the Bears than the Bears.

Inept QB play, questionable coaching by Pepe LeFleur and choking at the end. Maybe they saved Love for the Eagles but Love not returning made the Packers look totally weak and inept.

Eagles should eat the Packers' lunch next Sun at Veterans Stadium.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:04 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

I can’t disagree. It was a very aggravating game to watch. So many dumb mistakes (including a couple by MLF).

I think they can beat the Eagles, but even if they do they aren’t consistent enough to go on a run against good teams so I don’t have any expectations.

Pretty much where I'm at. Disappointing end to the regular season, but still think this season was a step in the right direction.

Tied for 8th best record (2 games better than last year)
Scored the 8th most points (4.9 PPG more than last year)
Allowed the 6th fewest points (.7 fewer than last year)
Had the 5th best point differential (+89 better than last year)

This was also the last year of the rodgers dead cap hit along with others like devondre campbell. They'll have more cap room and flexibility this offseason than the last two years. Next year we need to see additional progress, which gets harder the better you are. So they have some work to do this offseason.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32563
pizza_Place: What??
FavreFan wrote:
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Darkside wrote:
Well that was embarrassing for the Packers. Oof.

I can’t disagree. It was a very aggravating game to watch. So many dumb mistakes (including a couple by MLF).

I think they can beat the Eagles, but even if they do they aren’t consistent enough to go on a run against good teams so I don’t have any expectations.

Pretty much where I'm at. Disappointing end to the regular season, but still think this season was a step in the right direction.

Tied for 8th best record (2 games better than last year)
Scored the 8th most points (4.9 PPG more than last year)
Allowed the 6th fewest points (.7 fewer than last year)
Had the 5th best point differential (+89 better than last year)

This was also the last year of the rodgers dead cap hit along with others like devondre campbell. They'll have more cap room and flexibility this offseason than the last two years. Next year we need to see additional progress, which gets harder the better you are. So they have some work to do this offseason.

Love lofts passes that he doesn't need to. All year. He's gotten away with it a few times which might falsely reinforce that it's a good idea. It isn't.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
good dolphin wrote:
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

The performance of the team was good enough to get them into next weekend better than some.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:18 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
good dolphin wrote:
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

Tampa hasn’t beaten a team with a winning record all year.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32563
pizza_Place: What??
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

Tampa hasn’t beaten a team with a winning record all year.

Wash, Det, Phil, LAC


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38904
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Nardi wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

Tampa hasn’t beaten a team with a winning record all year.

Wash, Det, Phil, LAC

:lol:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 11:28 am
Posts: 24449
Location: Boofoo Zoo
pizza_Place: Chuck E Cheese
So they beat the top 2 seeds in the NFC, whatever.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 11:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
Nardi wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Packer fans must have been drunk when their record against good teams was flashed on their televisions yesterday.

I'd call them bumslayers but the bummy bears are still standing after yesterday

Tampa hasn’t beaten a team with a winning record all year.

Wash, Det, Phil, LAC

I got bad information!!!!

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 12:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 1212
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
Happy Victory Monday for those that celebrate!

:bounce:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30714
Watson, torn ACL. :(

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 28, 2006 6:06 am
Posts: 7073
Hawg Ass wrote:
Watson, torn ACL. :(


Eberflush level stupidity starting that guy yesterday. Would have sat all their key players. Shows how much they did not want to face Philly.

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
Caleb Williams isn't really a "true" rookie because he turned 23 late into his 1st season in the NFL!"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 12:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2016 8:49 pm
Posts: 1212
pizza_Place: World Famous, Lord Stanley's, DeKalb Rock City
Da Pack will miss his three drops in Philly


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
he was getting too old, anyway

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 1:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2009 2:18 pm
Posts: 27561
Location: Rizzo fo Shizzo
pizza_Place: Pizza Villa in DeKalb.
Juiced wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Watson, torn ACL. :(


Eberflush level stupidity starting that guy yesterday. Would have sat all their key players. Shows how much they did not want to face Philly.


They played him because Doubs went down with an illness after roster elevations were made. They could have just played with more 2 TE sets but they chose otherwise. He also tore the ACL on his "healthy" knee. It will be very interesting to see what he does going forward. Next year is his last year under contract. If he thinks he has shown enough to cash in in FA he might just take the entire year to rehab. Who knows what will happen though as he has a crazy lamar ball style father.

_________________
That's my purse! I don't know you!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 06, 2025 2:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32563
pizza_Place: What??
Juiced wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Watson, torn ACL. :(


Eberflush level stupidity starting that guy yesterday. Would have sat all their key players. Shows how much they did not want to face Philly.

I guess but he's Eloy level injury prone. All he did was stumble and POP! Might as well get used to life without him. The sooner the better.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10063 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 327, 328, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333 ... 336  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group