It is currently Thu Jan 30, 2025 1:39 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10063 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65994
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
pittmike wrote:
They are a year older though. Shorter of breath and one day closer to death.

Nice.

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Josh Jacobs in an an on again, off again pattern in his career over the past 5. Packers were ultra reliant on him this year and cannot afford a regression in 25.

Need to find a better balance and learn some damn discipline.


what's the timeline on Watson, because all the others play the same game. I thought Reed was a speedster, yet they seem to want him in situations where he is surrounded by defenders

They need some changes in that room, I have no idea on Watson but wouldn’t expect him until at least half of the season.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
FavreFan wrote:
[ I get the youngest team thing is a meme on here but the premise behind it proved to be correct, that they would improve going forward.


It's not a meme here, as much as a repetition of what is heard from packers fans all the time. I checked out 3-4 post games yesterday and they all spoke about it.

The premise did not prove correct. Their bodies broke down like a bunch of old coots.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2024 7:37 pm
Posts: 238
pizza_Place: Safe slice
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It was a disappointing end to the season. I get the youngest team thing is a meme on here but the premise behind it proved to be correct, that they would improve going forward.
Yes, the Packers clearly entered the elite tier in the NFL this year.

The hope was they would, but obviously they didn't.

But it's tough to argue they didn't improve when they had a better record, points per game scored, points per game allowed, yards per play, yards per play allowed, takeaways, turnover differential, and point differential.


I told you dick wad you cant beat good team's. Love did match half of Calebs interception total though in 1 game so you packer fagot's got that going for you

_________________
The Doctor Of Style wrote:
The rather "effeminate" Caleb Williams would have to be "My Guy"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Nardi wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Very disappointing end to a disappointing season, I had higher expectations.


I did not. They are what we thought they would be. Bumslayers and they failed at that against the Bears.

Love is not elite. He may not even be very good. League has caught on to La Fluer's offense and it shows.

The 6th best offense in the NFL this year.

He had an elite run in the middle of the season, so it's in him. He was pretty dinged up throughout the year and I would theorize it wore him down. That's not an excuse though as he needs to overcome dings. He's shit the bed for multiple consecutive weeks.


That excuse isn't an excuse, it's a justification to decrease blame.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Hawg Ass wrote:
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
It was a disappointing end to the season. I get the youngest team thing is a meme on here but the premise behind it proved to be correct, that they would improve going forward.
Yes, the Packers clearly entered the elite tier in the NFL this year.

The hope was they would, but obviously they didn't.

But it's tough to argue they didn't improve when they had a better record, points per game scored, points per game allowed, yards per play, yards per play allowed, takeaways, turnover differential, and point differential.

Do you see them improving on 1-5 in the division? I'm not so sure.

I am, I don’t see 1-5 a continuing theme.


should have been 0-6

will be next year

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
We can wager whatever you would like they won’t go 0-6 next year in the division.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Brick wrote:
But that's only really because the Packers were terrible the first 7 games of last year. Remember, all that talk about how awesome the Packers and Rodgers were the second half of the year?

But even then, if your point was with the "youngest team in the league" thing was that they would improve to a 7 seed losing in the wildcard round then I have to say "Mission Accomplished".

My point was they would improve on last year. They improved across the board, as I just showed you. I understand you're frustrated that you mocked a point that proved to be correct for the past year.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
[ I get the youngest team thing is a meme on here but the premise behind it proved to be correct, that they would improve going forward.


It's not a meme here, as much as a repetition of what is heard from packers fans all the time. I checked out 3-4 post games yesterday and they all spoke about it.

The premise did not prove correct. Their bodies broke down like a bunch of old coots.

Indisputably wrong. They were better on offense and defense.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Their backup OL looked eerily familiar to what I saw from the Bears.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2018 9:19 pm
Posts: 32556
pizza_Place: What??
good dolphin wrote:
Nardi wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Juiced wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
Very disappointing end to a disappointing season, I had higher expectations.


I did not. They are what we thought they would be. Bumslayers and they failed at that against the Bears.

Love is not elite. He may not even be very good. League has caught on to La Fluer's offense and it shows.

The 6th best offense in the NFL this year.

He had an elite run in the middle of the season, so it's in him. He was pretty dinged up throughout the year and I would theorize it wore him down. That's not an excuse though as he needs to overcome dings. He's shit the bed for multiple consecutive weeks.


That excuse isn't an excuse, it's a justification to decrease blame.

Ehh... It's a call to have a complete year, beginning to end. No one wants to see mere glimpses of what could be.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 2:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93295
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Brick wrote:
But that's only really because the Packers were terrible the first 7 games of last year. Remember, all that talk about how awesome the Packers and Rodgers were the second half of the year?

But even then, if your point was with the "youngest team in the league" thing was that they would improve to a 7 seed losing in the wildcard round then I have to say "Mission Accomplished".

My point was they would improve on last year. They improved across the board, as I just showed you. I understand you're frustrated that you mocked a point that proved to be correct for the past year.

I think it's pretty obvious they were a better team last year than this year by the end of the year.

The Bears are going to improve next year too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
Hawg Ass wrote:
We can wager whatever you would like they won’t go 0-6 next year in the division.


I win you take me on a date. You win, I take you on a date

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 2:35 pm
Posts: 82846
I like the Packer fan theme that they just didn't catch the breaks yesterday. That will keep them complacent.

_________________
O judgment! Thou art fled to brutish beasts,
And men have lost their reason.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
good dolphin wrote:
I like the Packer fan theme that they just didn't catch the breaks yesterday. That will keep them complacent.

Catch the breaks, play fucking better. Don’t turn the ball over and commit 85 yards in penalties.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 3:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
good dolphin wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
We can wager whatever you would like they won’t go 0-6 next year in the division.


I win you take me on a date. You win, I take you on a date

Can I trust you?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:21 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38621
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
good dolphin wrote:
Their backup OL looked eerily familiar to what I saw from the Bears.


And it was enjoyable to watch the Packers look like the Bears.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Their backup OL looked eerily familiar to what I saw from the Bears.


And it was enjoyable to watch the Packers look like the Bears.

That first son of a bitch they put in at left guard, my God that was atrocious.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11114
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
billypootons wrote:
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries

Which injury would you place blame on for that person?

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11114
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Hawg Ass wrote:
billypootons wrote:
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries

Which injury would you place blame on for that person?


all of them. what's the point of having a young roster if they are always hurt.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
good dolphin wrote:
I like the Packer fan theme that they just didn't catch the breaks yesterday. That will keep them complacent.

You like this theme that you made up in your head and wasn't said by any of us?


Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Not much to be said. They sucked ass and deserved to lose.

Hawg Ass wrote:
Very disappointing end to a disappointing season, I had higher expectations.

FavreFan wrote:
Love played bad, Philly was the better team. It was a disappointing end to the season.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72560
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
billypootons wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
billypootons wrote:
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries

Which injury would you place blame on for that person?


all of them. what's the point of having a young roster if they are always hurt.

I am a bit concerned that Love seems a little fragile. He's not a small guy but he seems to get hurt pretty easily. Or it was just a fluky season, time will tell. Outside of that, football's a rough sport. Injuries happen regardless of age. Not much you can do about it.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
billypootons wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
billypootons wrote:
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries

Which injury would you place blame on for that person?


all of them. what's the point of having a young roster if they are always hurt.

So you have no clue what you are talking about and wanted to chime in, got it.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 17, 2013 6:09 pm
Posts: 11114
pizza_Place: Generic Pizza Store
Hawg Ass wrote:
billypootons wrote:
Hawg Ass wrote:
billypootons wrote:
maybe hire a new strength/conditioning coach... for having the youngest team you sure get a lot of injuries

Which injury would you place blame on for that person?


all of them. what's the point of having a young roster if they are always hurt.

So you have no clue what you are talking about and wanted to chime in, got it.


yes, but this applies to 85% of posts on this website


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 5:28 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2005 6:45 pm
Posts: 38621
Location: Lovetron
pizza_Place: Malnati's
Hawg Ass wrote:
Seacrest wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
Their backup OL looked eerily familiar to what I saw from the Bears.


And it was enjoyable to watch the Packers look like the Bears.

That first son of a bitch they put in at left guard, my God that was atrocious.


That dude made Larry Borom look like Tony Boselli.

_________________
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
The victims are the American People and the Republic itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 21, 2016 3:24 pm
Posts: 17309
pizza_Place: Pequods
I feel like it's a good day to remind the Packer fans that they committed $55 million per year to Love to be a mediocre QB. I mean this guy makes Jay Cutler look like Tom Brady or Peyton Manning

_________________
“When I walked in this morning, and saw the flag was at half mast, I thought 'alright another bureaucrat ate it.'" - Ron Swanson


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 6:35 pm 
Online
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 03, 2005 1:04 pm
Posts: 13442
Location: God's country
pizza_Place: Gem City
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I feel like it's a good day to remind the Packer fans that they committed $55 million per year to Love to be a mediocre QB. I mean this guy makes Jay Cutler look like Tom Brady or Peyton Manning

The definition of “out of town stupid”. You are wrong about both the numbers and his overall performance. Other than that, great post.

_________________
Mr. Trump is unfit for our nation’s highest office.- JD Vance
If you committed violence on that day, obviously, you shouldn’t be pardoned.- JD Vance on the J-6 insurrectionists


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 16, 2007 2:00 pm
Posts: 30712
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I feel like it's a good day to remind the Packer fans that they committed $55 million per year to Love to be a mediocre QB. I mean this guy makes Jay Cutler look like Tom Brady or Peyton Manning

It is absolutely terrible that a certain population of the dumbasses in Arkansas have brought you in, we have much better people.

_________________
2018
#ExtendLafleur
10 More Wins


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Green Bay Packers
PostPosted: Mon Jan 13, 2025 7:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 28, 2006 9:29 am
Posts: 65994
Location: Darkside Estates
pizza_Place: A cat got an online degree.
Zippy-The-Pinhead wrote:
Ogie Oglethorpe wrote:
I feel like it's a good day to remind the Packer fans that they committed $55 million per year to Love to be a mediocre QB. I mean this guy makes Jay Cutler look like Tom Brady or Peyton Manning

The definition of “out of town stupid”. You are wrong about both the numbers and his overall performance. Other than that, great post.

Are you in a town where he didn't throw 3 interceptions in his last game and lost to the bears the prior week?

_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."
http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10063 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 12 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group