Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=100370
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Don Tiny [ Fri May 20, 2016 10:38 am ]
Post subject:  MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Look like a nice joint.

Image

Author:  bigfan [ Fri May 20, 2016 10:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

TEDDY HAS "STUDIES" THAT SAY ITS NOT GOOD! JUST ASK HIM!!!!!

Author:  bigfan [ Fri May 20, 2016 10:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Ted Phillips Study on Grass v Turf

TED, Yelling out his backdoor -'Hey kids, you like to roll around the grass or the turf?"
Kids "The Grass!!!!!"

Study Concluded

Author:  Don Tiny [ Fri May 20, 2016 10:43 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

:lol:

Author:  FieldTurf [ Fri May 20, 2016 11:37 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Gaze upon the beauty that I create.

If only the Chicago Park District hadn't gotten that restraining order....

Author:  Hockey Gay [ Fri May 20, 2016 11:40 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

bigfan wrote:
Ted Phillips Study on Grass v Turf

TED, Yelling out his backdoor -'Hey kids, you like to roll around the grass or the turf?"
Kids "The Grass!!!!!"

Study Concluded

:lol: :lol:

Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Fri May 20, 2016 12:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Ted Phillips was wrong on two counts: he said grass was safer for impact injuries and that somehow the grass gave the Bears a competitive advantage (wtf?). However, he may end up accidentally looking smart as growing evidence suggests that the chemicals in the crumbled rubber may cause long-term health issues. So just like his current job, he fell into the right answer!

Author:  doug - evergreen park [ Fri May 20, 2016 12:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

playing football causes long-term health issues...

Author:  RFDC [ Fri May 20, 2016 12:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

RIP the Field Turf thread

Author:  good dolphin [ Fri May 20, 2016 3:13 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

I think the Vikings missed out on a pretty huge late season home field advantage by not having an outdoor stadium.

Seattle wanted no part of an undermanned Vikings in the playoffs last year.

Author:  billypootons [ Fri May 20, 2016 3:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

good dolphin wrote:
I think the Vikings missed out on a pretty huge late season home field advantage by not having an outdoor stadium.

Seattle wanted no part of an undermanned Vikings in the playoffs last year.


works out fine for the bear, another dome team to lose in the cold if the home game is scheduled in november/december that year

Author:  Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Fri May 20, 2016 3:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Image

That thing is going to have some pretty weird shadows.

I think its going to look pretty ugly on TV.

Author:  good dolphin [ Fri May 20, 2016 3:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

billypootons wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
I think the Vikings missed out on a pretty huge late season home field advantage by not having an outdoor stadium.

Seattle wanted no part of an undermanned Vikings in the playoffs last year.


works out fine for the bear, another dome team to lose in the cold if the home game is scheduled in november/december that year


I forgot about that.

I do think Bridgewater is a dome type of QB.

Author:  a retard [ Sat May 21, 2016 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Image

That thing is going to have some pretty weird shadows.

I think its going to look pretty ugly on TV.


It's a rendition, so who knows? They say shadows won't be a problem.

Quote:
From http://www.usbankstadium.com/new-viking ... xperience/

John Larson – What can you do to get rid of shadowing on the field?

Shadowing will exist but we expect it to be very minimal. Along with the ETFE defusing sunlight, the steel support structure underneath the ETFE is much smaller and lighter than large trusses that span the length of the stadium, causing smaller shadows. HKS has prepared sun studies to better understand this issue. It is an important one for all parties, and we are confident shadows will not be an issue for players or fans.

Author:  Don Tiny [ Sat May 21, 2016 8:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

I don't think MN ever gets that much sunshine anyway.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sat May 21, 2016 8:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Looks okay, I guess, but it was a terrible deal for the taxpayers to replace the Metrodome with three different venues. Vikings and Gophers should have shared a stadium permanently; neither one justifies its own building with so few dates. Isn't the Target Center getting some free money for renovations, too?

Author:  a retard [ Sun May 22, 2016 6:28 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

My sister's MIL lives in MSP and she sure pitched a fit about the taxpayers having to fund all this. She would have rather had the Vikings move. Can't say I blame her. Broke cities with crumbling infrastructure and bad schools paying for stadiums for rich owners seems out of whack.

Author:  Curious Hair [ Sun May 22, 2016 9:29 am ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Dirty little secret of the Twin Cities is that half the people up there are Packers fans. Lots of Minnesotans were Packers fans before the Vikings were established/got good and passed it down through generations, plus the Cities are a major destination for Wisconsin's brain drain. Combine that with the fact that all the Vikings do is kick their fans in the dick really hard every year and it's no wonder people would have wanted them to go. I'm surprised more people don't have a laissez-faire attitude toward letting the Bears leave.

Author:  Regular Reader [ Sun May 22, 2016 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Curious Hair wrote:
Vikings and Gophers should have shared a stadium permanently; neither one justifies its own building with so few dates.


This. It really seems like one of the few things Mark Dayton kind of screwed the pooch on.

Author:  Drake LaRrieta [ Sun May 22, 2016 1:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: MN Vikings Field Turf Just Installed

Curious Hair wrote:
Dirty little secret of the Twin Cities is that half the people up there are Packers fans. Lots of Minnesotans were Packers fans before the Vikings were established/got good and passed it down through generations, plus the Cities are a major destination for Wisconsin's brain drain. Combine that with the fact that all the Vikings do is kick their fans in the dick really hard every year and it's no wonder people would have wanted them to go. I'm surprised more people don't have a laissez-faire attitude toward letting the Bears leave.


The Twin Cities are very close to Wisconsin also. It's less than 40 minutes to Wisconsin from Minneapolis.

Everybody liked to talk smack about the Metrodome, but it was the most versatile stadium in sports. It was the only stadium that hosted the World Series, the Super Bowl, the NCAA Final Four, the Twins, the Vikings, the Gophers, Monster Jam and Snowcross.

That's true about too many stadiums in Minnesota. They have the Target Center (Twolves), TCF Bank Field (Gophers Football), the Xcel Energy Center (Wild), Target Field (Twins), Mariucci Arena (Gophers Hockey), Williams Arena (Gophers Basketball) and U.S. Bank Stadium (Vikings).

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/