| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=103029 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
IMU and I got into a bar argument with some other fucker tonight. IMU and his other guy said Belichick is by far and away the best coach in the NFL history and there's nobody close. Off the top of my head I mention Bill Walsh and both of them dismiss me like I'm saying Marc Trestman. I'm not asking if Walsh is better, in asking if it's close. MANY of you guys are old, so what say you? |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
.609 winning percentage, 3 Super Bowl Victories, an innovator Heck yeah it is close at the very least |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Belichick is carried by cheating deplorable T*m Brady. Walsh had good upstanding moral qbs from ND and BYU. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
312player wrote: You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. Did you even read what he asked? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
312player wrote: You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. TO is better than Moss. Don't be stupid. If you were on the OSFMB you would easily agree. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
FavreFan wrote: IMU and I got into a bar argument with some other fucker tonight. Shocking. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
RFDC wrote: 312player wrote: You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. Did you even read what he asked? I don't think its close, Belichick is the MJ of NFL coaches. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
312player wrote: RFDC wrote: 312player wrote: You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. Did you even read what he asked? I don't think its close, Belichick is the MJ of NFL coaches.  I remember when I was 25 years old too. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: RFDC wrote: 312player wrote: You're wrong, Belichick is Tops..just like your irrational T.O. over Moss..you are wrong again. Did you even read what he asked? I don't think its close, Belichick is the MJ of NFL coaches. I remember when I was 25 years old too. I do too, it was a great year til the Sox won the world series. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Belichick is on a level all his own. I wonder what he would have done with his life if he hadn't gone into football. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:40 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Lombardi? Shula? |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Papa Bear, not even close my friend! |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Curious Hair wrote: Belichick is on a level all his own. I wonder what he would have done with his life if he hadn't gone into football. Lead the Dark side 
|
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Spaulding wrote: Lombardi? Shula? Different game before free agency~ salary cap ..much harder now for sustained success. |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 10:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Sure but they have a place in NFL history. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Spaulding wrote: Sure but they have a place in NFL history. Yes...below bill Belichick |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Tue Nov 01, 2016 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Don Tiny wrote: Penny for your thoughts Tiny? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Don Tiny wrote: Penny for your thoughts Tiny? |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:42 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Walsh and a few others are on his level. |
|
| Author: | Hockey Gay [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 12:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
I think that Belichick is better mainly because he found a 6th round cast off at QB and ended up making him his starter. The rest is history. We don't even need to talk about everything else that Belichick has been great at. However, arguing that Bill Walsh is as good is a legit arguement that I'd hear. To just scoff at it makes you a turdbag. |
|
| Author: | GoldenJet [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 1:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
D-I-T-K-A my friend |
|
| Author: | Spaulding [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 1:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
So if Belichick is the best is Brady better than Montana? Is Belichick the difference? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 2:03 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Hockey Gay wrote: I think that Belichick is better mainly because he found a 6th round cast off at QB and ended up making him his starter. The rest is history. We don't even need to talk about everything else that Belichick has been great at. However, arguing that Bill Walsh is as good is a legit arguement that I'd hear. To just scoff at it makes you a turdbag. I pretty much agree with this. That's why I presented it to the board. Many here will be able to make a better argument than I'm able to currently, I just know it's close. In that same vein, I'd like Dr Ken to feel free to explain why Ditka is better than both and I'll listen. |
|
| Author: | TurdFerguson [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 4:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Curious Hair wrote: I wonder what he would have done with his life if he hadn't gone into football. Accountant at Enron Personal banker at Wells Fargo. Bay Area chemist Mortgage securitization specialist. I keep them close as Walsh did it with two different qbs and the cheating controversies matter. There is a strong chance he won his first Super Bowl having recorded the practices of his opponent. |
|
| Author: | pittmike [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 5:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Chuck Noll is underrated and should get love. BTW, didn't Parcells "find" Brady? Never mind I looked it up. |
|
| Author: | Cashman [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Walsh, hands down. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
Hockey Gay wrote: We don't even need to talk about everything else that Belichick has been great at. Yup, like how he got great deals on those cameras he used to spy on other teams' practices. Put an asterisk next to this guy's records. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Wed Nov 02, 2016 6:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick v. Bill Walsh |
It's clearly close. We will see if Bill can win one without Brady. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|