Is this the worst NFL playoff game ever?
On deadspin, it said that the Texans have a -49 point differential this year.
Oakland may be starting Connor Cook.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Raiders-Texans https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=104265 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Jan 02, 2017 3:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Raiders-Texans |
Is this the worst NFL playoff game ever? On deadspin, it said that the Texans have a -49 point differential this year. Oakland may be starting Connor Cook. |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Mon Jan 02, 2017 4:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
the AFC South is the most meaningless divisional title to win in the NFL right now. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Jan 02, 2017 9:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
This might be the best chance Houston has of making it out of the 2nd rd. this year. If SD had won yesterday, they'd be fucked. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Tue Jan 03, 2017 5:43 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Boilermaker Rick wrote: Is this the worst NFL playoff game ever? On deadspin, it said that the Texans have a -49 point differential this year. Oakland may be starting Connor Cook. May be...the 8-8 Rams vs 9-7 Seahawks a dozen years ago or so was pretty fucking brutal as well. |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Tue Jan 03, 2017 7:48 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
it's a shame that the raiders and dolphins are missing their starting QB's. both teams are nice additions to a predictable post season. but they won't be fun to watch at all. |
|
| Author: | Kirkwood [ Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:14 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
ESPN pays the NFL $100M to broadcast one Wild Card game. The awful MNF games are a separate package.
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Put your money on the Texans |
|
| Author: | reents [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Kirkwood wrote: ESPN pays the NFL $100M to broadcast one Wild Card game. The awful MNF games are a separate package. 2nd straight year, they gave them the Texans game too. Osweiler gets the start, time to earn that money. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Nas wrote: Put your money on the Texans Put your money in the fireplace. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Kirkwood wrote: ESPN pays the NFL $100M to broadcast one Wild Card game. The awful MNF games are a separate package. At least they simulcast the game on ABC. They might have to because it's a playoff game and has to be available over the air. I'm kind of surprised that for what ESPN pays for Monday Night Football, they don't insist on better games. Seems like at least half of Fox's late games were de facto national games and better ones than whatever Jets-Falcons crap ESPN got stuck with. |
|
| Author: | reents [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 11:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Curious Hair wrote: Kirkwood wrote: ESPN pays the NFL $100M to broadcast one Wild Card game. The awful MNF games are a separate package. At least they simulcast the game on ABC. They might have to because it's a playoff game and has to be available over the air. I'm kind of surprised that for what ESPN pays for Monday Night Football, they don't insist on better games. Seems like at least half of Fox's late games were de facto national games and better ones than whatever Jets-Falcons crap ESPN got stuck with. I always go with the thought, that since some people still don't have cable, they don't want to give them the big games, even though it's Monday night, they still get their old Sunday night schedule, the real big games are now on Sunday night NBC. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Wed Jan 04, 2017 12:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Well, it's a better package than their old Sunday night detritus (which often felt like the worst game of the week), but it's still not as good as you'd think an unopposed national game would be. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Well, the 1st Quarter was good at least
|
|
| Author: | Furious Styles [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Connor Cook became a man today. How many of you can say that? |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Well I proved that I was a man today. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
I wonder what the +/- was on Raiders being injured and taken out of the game. Too Bears-y. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 8:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
well that sucked |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sat Jan 07, 2017 11:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Don Tiny wrote: I wonder what the +/- was on Raiders being injured and taken out of the game. Too Bears-y. Too Bearsy?! The Raiders just played a playoff game. That is the complete antethesis of "Bearsy" |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 08, 2017 12:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Raiders-Texans |
Can the Texans just concede and move on with their off-season plans? That way we could watch professional football teams. Thanks in advance for your understanding. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|