So that's a "No" then...
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Bill Belichick https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=128805 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Bill Belichick |
Under .500 without Brady. Essentially Cleveland Browns Belichick with an aura. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Yet, almost beat Green Bay yesterday with a QB found at the local 7-11. When was the last time a Bears coach was even competitive in Green Bay? I'd take him coaching the Bears in a second. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: Yet, almost beat Green Bay yesterday with a QB found at the local 7-11. When was the last time a Bears coach was even competitive in Green Bay? I'd take him coaching the Bears in a second. Enjoy your 1990's Cleveland Browns. I'll enjoy my Bears who have a bright future. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: When was the last time a Bears coach was even competitive in Green Bay? Nagy lost in GB by a point. John Fox won in Lambeau. Caller Bob wrote: I'd take him coaching the Bears in a second. I don't believe anybody has ever said otherwise. Or are you replying to another made up post?
|
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
The future of the Bears looks like leather helmet football |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: The future of the Bears looks like leather helmet football Retro, we're taking them back like Halas did. There isn't 1 way to win. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Belichick is 59-74 with 0 playoff wins without Brady on his roster. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:08 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? The year after Brady didn't lose a game? Yes, Brady and his influence were still on the roster. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
| So that's a "No" then...
|
|
| Author: | man of few opinions [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? or the 11-5 season he posted with Vinny Testeverde in Cleveland, when they made the playoffs. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
man of few opinions wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? or the 11-5 season he posted with Vinny Testeverde in Cleveland, when they made the playoffs. The 59-74 record includes his playoff loss with Vinny T. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Frank Coztansa wrote: :lol: So that's a "No" then... It would be remiss of me not to point out that the Patriots not only failed to win a playoff game that season, but they failed to make the playoffs. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Non-Brady Patriot Seasons 2008 11-5 (Cassell year) 2020 7-9 2021 10-7 2022 1-3 29-24 This is a bad troll job |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Nas wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: So that's a "No" then...It would be remiss of me not to point out that the Patriots not only failed to win a playoff game that season, but they failed to make the playoffs. Well when I get to see my team win 3-5+ Super Bowls in a relatively short span, I'll forgive an 11 win miss-the-playoffs season.
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: Non-Brady Patriot Seasons 2008 11-5 (Cassell year) 2020 7-9 2021 10-7 2022 1-3 29-24 This is a bad troll job Even if you focused on the Patriot years without Brady on the roster, he's under .500 with zero playoff wins. Belichick has literally never won a playoff game without Brady starting. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Nas wrote: Caller Bob wrote: Non-Brady Patriot Seasons 2008 11-5 (Cassell year) 2020 7-9 2021 10-7 2022 1-3 29-24 This is a bad troll job Even if you focused on the Patriot years without Brady on the roster, he's under .500 with zero playoff wins. Belichick has literally never won a playoff game without Brady starting. Then he's 18-19 (with 2022 still up in the air), if they don't win a playoff game this year, it's because Mac Jones(your hero) sucks. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: Nas wrote: Caller Bob wrote: Non-Brady Patriot Seasons 2008 11-5 (Cassell year) 2020 7-9 2021 10-7 2022 1-3 29-24 This is a bad troll job Even if you focused on the Patriot years without Brady on the roster, he's under .500 with zero playoff wins. Belichick has literally never won a playoff game without Brady starting. Then he's 18-19 (with 2022 still up in the air), if they don't win a playoff game this year, it's because Mac Jones(your hero) sucks. It's still below .500 with 0 playoff wins. It should be clear that the Patriot way was the Brady way. Enjoy your Cleveland Browns! |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
The Browns look good this year...nice weapons on offense, once they get Watson back they could be tugging on my Bears fandom. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 3:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: The Browns look good this year...nice weapons on offense, once they get Watson back they could be tugging on my Bears fandom. Ouch! Watson knows a lot about tugging. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
So does Bob. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Caller Bob wrote: The Browns look good this year...nice weapons on offense, once they get Watson back they could be tugging on my Bears fandom. Enough of yanking Nas' chain. Go flog Good Dolphin. |
|
| Author: | Curious Hair [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 4:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
The restrictions on training camp and practice probably play a large part as well. For a lot of years, I think the Patriots just outpracticed everybody (sometimes by spying). |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 5:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Curious Hair wrote: The restrictions on training camp and practice probably play a large part as well. For a lot of years, I think the Patriots just outpracticed everybody (sometimes by spying). I believe he won 2 more SB with Brady after the training camp restrictions, and went to a couple more. |
|
| Author: | stlmax [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Nas wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? The year after Brady didn't lose a game? Save your tall tales for your great grandchildren. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 03, 2022 8:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
stlmax wrote: Nas wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? The year after Brady didn't lose a game? Save your tall tales for your great grandchildren. In the regular season. Us Brady Stan's don't remember New York and Philadelphia games. |
|
| Author: | Nardi [ Tue Oct 04, 2022 7:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Nas wrote: stlmax wrote: Nas wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Does that include his 11-5 Matt Cassell season? The year after Brady didn't lose a game? Save your tall tales for your great grandchildren. In the regular season. Us Brady Stan's don't remember New York and Philadelphia games. I guess I never noticed what a meatball you are when it's related to the pointy pigskin. It makes me smile. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
Nas wrote: Under .500 without Brady. Essentially Cleveland Browns Belichick with an aura. Big Bill back on top, Brady washed up |
|
| Author: | Regular Reader [ Sun Oct 16, 2022 7:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
312player wrote: Nas wrote: Under .500 without Brady. Essentially Cleveland Browns Belichick with an aura. Big Bill back on top, Brady washed up So things are right. Fuck the drug fiend. |
|
| Author: | Seacrest [ Sun Oct 16, 2022 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Bill Belichick |
312player wrote: Nas wrote: Under .500 without Brady. Essentially Cleveland Browns Belichick with an aura. Big Bill back on top, Brady washed up Yeah, Big Bill ain't beating the Bills. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|