Eagles would have lost to the rams on a clean track. I don't think their D is as good as the Rams, but the Commanders are very strong at DL. Rams had a field day against the vaunted Eagle OL. I'd take the Commanders

How can you bet against the Chiefs on a short line? I know its cliche, but, my goodness, do they get a lot of calls.

I feel I almost have to bet against the Chiefs...on principle. They aren't real good. They're like the Bulls last championship. It's more guile than talent.

The public sees it and that's why it's a pick 'em at home.

It's a near identical situation as last night. I think books and public see these three top afc teams as even for different reasons.

It felt ridiculous that the Bills were home dogs but the game really played even and if they played another quarter the ravens would have won.

If they don't lay the ball down or drop passes, yes, they would have won with another quarter. I admit I walked away with a 'phew' and I empathize with the Raven bettors.

But this is the Ravens MO.

No doubt. I had Bills, Rams and the under in Chiefs. I won all but felt I was pretty lucky on all. I had the Lions, saw the line drop 1.5 points before kick off and peace outed on that bet. Someone knew something

That's amazing.

that's not the current mayor. I think the police chief pictured was the the chicago guy who eventually was chief of philly and dc

Yes current mayor and, just…yikes.

I think it’s stupid to go for two in the first half. You’re chasing point differences that will certainly be different, just get everything you can get now. It’s not like the Eagles are just to be held to fourteen. Now if the Eagles score a TD and get the PAT you’re two scores down, whereas before you could’ve kept the eight point difference and only gone for the two if you needed to.

How the analytics cannot capture this baffles me.

Josh Allen might want to get to the locker room and change his diaper.