Sorry. Didn't see this. I was too busy wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.....
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=68093 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Drop In [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
Whoof. RG3 better be worth it. I'd rather have the picks. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
Sorry. Didn't see this. I was too busy wiping tears of laughter from my eyes.....
|
|
| Author: | spanky [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
The Colts should draft RG III just to rattle Shanahan a little. |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: Sorry. Didn't see this. I was too busy wiping tears of laughter from my eyes..... Mike Rizzo is feeling better about his Jayson Werth signing right now. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: The Colts should draft RG III just to rattle Shanahan a little. #mindfuck
|
|
| Author: | spanky [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
Honestly, right now this is worse than Ditka's trade for Ricky. If only because was a damn good back. We have no idea what RG III is gonna be. Seriously. I can't stop. Shanahan is a moron.
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
And people gave the Bears shit for giving up 2 1st round picks for a guy who was proven in the NFL. This dude may very well be a huge bust. Crazy. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
RFDC wrote: And people gave the Bears shit for giving up 2 1st round picks for a guy who was proven in the NFL. This dude may very well be a huge bust. Crazy. I get what you're saying, but it was 2 1sts, a 2nd and a QB who was semi-proven in the NFL for Cutler. But still. The F'n Redskins.
|
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
That's pretty stupid. chas and redskingreg get fucked again. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: The Colts should draft RG III just to rattle Shanahan a little. 25 minutes after I posted this, some other board member tweeted this: @ChicagoDuffer Wanna know what would be funny? If Irsay pulled a fast one on Washington and drafted RGIII instead of Luck. 
|
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: spanky wrote: The Colts should draft RG III just to rattle Shanahan a little. 25 minutes after I posted this, some other board member tweeted this: @ChicagoDuffer Wanna know what would be funny? If Irsay pulled a fast one on Washington and drafted RGIII instead of Luck. Lawyer up. You know what? I think this is what the skins want. They want to tempt an emotionally vulnerable Irsay into drafting someone other than Luck, so they can get him themselves. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Mar 09, 2012 11:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: Honestly, right now this is worse than Ditka's trade for Ricky. If only because was a damn good back. We have no idea what RG III is gonna be. Seriously. I can't stop. Shanahan is a moron. Right now this is nowhere close to better or worse than the Ditka trade. You have no clue, you're just guessing, like every other analyst and the Redskins. What if RGIII is better than Elway? So we have no idea it this was a good or bad trade. I like the move. The Browns are going all-in. You don't see that often in the NFL and we should see it more. If RGIII is a franchise back like Brees, Rodgers, Manning, Brady, what-we-think-Cam-can-be, then it's a total bargain. There's like 6-8 true franchise QBs out there. If the Browns think they got their guy then this is a bargain for them. I guarantee Green Bay would hang up right now if someone offered them SEVEN first round picks for Rodgers. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
FavreFan wrote: spanky wrote: Honestly, right now this is worse than Ditka's trade for Ricky. If only because was a damn good back. We have no idea what RG III is gonna be. Seriously. I can't stop. Shanahan is a moron. Right now this is nowhere close to better or worse than the Ditka trade. You have no clue, you're just guessing, like every other analyst and the Redskins. What if RGIII is better than Elway? So we have no idea it this was a good or bad trade. I like the move. The Browns are going all-in. You don't see that often in the NFL and we should see it more. If RGIII is a franchise back like Brees, Rodgers, Manning, Brady, what-we-think-Cam-can-be, then it's a total bargain. There's like 6-8 true franchise QBs out there. If the Browns think they got their guy then this is a bargain for them. I guarantee Green Bay would hang up right now if someone offered them SEVEN first round picks for Rodgers. Favre fan is drunk. The "Browns" are all in?  This is how it's worse than the Ditka trade: Would you rather trade that many picks for a guaranteed stud RB (Ricky - in hindsight) or a total prospect QB that had one good year in college (RG III)? Obviously, in hindsight, the Ditka trade wasn't as bad. |
|
| Author: | Home5licE [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
What are the odds the Rams still get Blackmon at 6? |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
Home5licE wrote: What are the odds the Rams still get Blackmon at 6? 0 |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: FavreFan wrote: spanky wrote: Honestly, right now this is worse than Ditka's trade for Ricky. If only because was a damn good back. We have no idea what RG III is gonna be. Seriously. I can't stop. Shanahan is a moron. Right now this is nowhere close to better or worse than the Ditka trade. You have no clue, you're just guessing, like every other analyst and the Redskins. What if RGIII is better than Elway? So we have no idea it this was a good or bad trade. I like the move. The Browns are going all-in. You don't see that often in the NFL and we should see it more. If RGIII is a franchise back like Brees, Rodgers, Manning, Brady, what-we-think-Cam-can-be, then it's a total bargain. There's like 6-8 true franchise QBs out there. If the Browns think they got their guy then this is a bargain for them. I guarantee Green Bay would hang up right now if someone offered them SEVEN first round picks for Rodgers. Favre fan is drunk. The "Browns" are all in? This is how it's worse than the Ditka trade: Would you rather trade that many picks for a guaranteed stud RB (Ricky - in hindsight) or a total prospect QB that had one good year in college (RG III)? Obviously, in hindsight, the Ditka trade wasn't as bad. Yep I am drunk. But that doesn't make your position more viable. You are using the benefit of hindsight with Ricky, and even then I disagree with you. His best years were in Miami. I'm on record right now as saying this will be a better trade for the Browns then the Ricky trade was for New Orleans. That's not a high bar for Griffin to leap either. Edit: yes I am drunk, but I don't get the mocking wink at the "all in" comment". Isn't that the perfect word to describe the trade? I think it's overwhelmingly likely that they either get a franchise QB or a bust. All-In is the perfect phrase to describe the Browns trade. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
FavreFan wrote: I'm on record right now as saying this will be a better trade for the Browns then the Ricky trade was for New Orleans. That's not a high bar for Griffin to leap either. Ok, I'm drinking too, but you're doing the "Browns" thing on purpose, right? 
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
I want to go on record right now saying this deal here will work out great for the Bears. |
|
| Author: | spanky [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
I really like how the Chargers showed they were going for it with this move. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: FavreFan wrote: I'm on record right now as saying this will be a better trade for the Browns then the Ricky trade was for New Orleans. That's not a high bar for Griffin to leap either. Ok, I'm drinking too, but you're doing the "Browns" thing on purpose, right? I don't understand the question. This was a fantastic trade for Baltimore. |
|
| Author: | reents [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 12:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
If the Redskins end up getting Robert Griffin, I really hope it works out well. Griffin's stock could be rising because of what Cam Newton did last year. Why di some of you put zero as the Ram's Chances of getting Blackmon. Are Browns going to be the team that takes him. With the Skins drafting a QB here, could buy Shanahan a couple more years there. Schefter did say this does not take the Skins out of getting Peyton Manning. |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:32 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
Shanny has lost it. No way you can give up what they gave up for a draft pick. The only thing that could be dumber than the 'Skins deal would be if the Colts took RG3 with the first pick. |
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
See, now I think it was a good move. |
|
| Author: | Don Tiny [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
spanky wrote: Honestly, right now this is worse than Ditka's trade for Ricky. RFDC wrote: And people gave the Bears shit for giving up 2 1st round picks for a guy who was proven in the NFL. This dude may very well be a huge bust. Crazy. Precisely my thoughts one after the other. Ditka's gonna get taken off the ol' "dumbest trade ever" mantle in short order. Just completely unbelievable. I wonder if the billboard business will be booming in Washington this coming year. |
|
| Author: | Home5licE [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
RFDC wrote: Home5licE wrote: What are the odds the Rams still get Blackmon at 6? 0 Then I rate this move a 9.9 instead of a 10 for the Rams...still have to make it, but it would have been nice to have that guy. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Redskins give up the farm for the #2 pick |
the skins do not value draft picks and that is one of the reasons why they are no threat to win a sb anytime soon... ditka crippled the franchise with that dumb move but the hershel walker trade is the worst all time. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|