2012: #6 pick, #34 pick, #38 pick
2013: 2 First rounders
2014: 2 first Rounders
At least 7 top 40 picks over 3 years.
9 1 and 2's over three years
Fuckin Redskins
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Ram's Dynasty on Deck https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=68169 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
2012: #6 pick, #34 pick, #38 pick 2013: 2 First rounders 2014: 2 first Rounders At least 7 top 40 picks over 3 years. 9 1 and 2's over three years Fuckin Redskins
|
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
Meh... Unless Bradford is the real deal it will all be for nothing. |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
I thought they did great in getting value.... |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
They definitely have an opportunity to be real good if Bradford can develop and they can find some pieces to go around him. I don't have much confidence in it actually happening though. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
denisdman wrote: I thought they did great in getting value.... They did for sure but they wont be drafting a QB and if Bradford ends up being a bust, it wont matter the great players around him. |
|
| Author: | Urlacher's missing neck [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
The NFL is very excited at the team they should be able to field once they are back in LA. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:19 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
RFDC wrote: They definitely have an opportunity to be real good if Bradford can develop and they can find some pieces to go around him. I don't have much confidence in it actually happening though. This. If anything, Bradford is regressing, not progressing. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
Agreed. First round picks are always a lock to be a great player. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
redskingreg wrote: Agreed. First round picks are always a lock to be a great player. Isn't that exactly what Dan Snyder is paying a ton of draft picks for?
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
You guys are acting like the Rams are so inept they should just close up shop They have arranged to have 9 picks in the first 2 rounds of the next three drafts. That's impressive. They'll hit on some of em. Even if Bradford doesnt work out, you can still get a bunch of good players and get a QB down the road. |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 7:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
rogers park bryan wrote: You guys are acting like the Rams are so inept they should just close up shop Not to mention that it's hard to really be skillful or bad at drafting in the first round. It's more luck than anything that the guy you pick who everyone thinks could be really good ends up really good. Aaron Rodgers is probably one of the best first round draft picks of all time. Let's really analyze it though. It was luck. If the Packers really saw his ability coming you think they are sitting back and waiting and hoping he falls to the end of the first round? Of course not. They'd be moving up at least into the 10-15 range where he would have been available. They have arranged to have 9 picks in the first 2 rounds of the next three drafts. That's impressive. They'll hit on some of em. Even if Bradford doesnt work out, you can still get a bunch of good players and get a QB down the road. That's why first round draft picks are so valuable and why the Redskins were probably stupid. The Rams are going to have a bunch of pulls at it. Some will likely be busts or at least average. Others may be great. That is why RG3 must be great. Not good. Not very good. He must be great. He needs to be a top 5 QB. At least with the Cutler trade they knew he was a capable NFL QB. We had a floor on Cutler. RG3 could be the next Ryan Leaf or Tim Couch. I don't think he will be but even first round NFL QB's fail as much as they succeed. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 8:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
RG III would have to be Tom Brady for that to be worth it. Redskins next three years of drafts 2012: RG3, No second rd 2013: No first round 2014: No first round Not to mention the cap penalty they got this year They are soooo fucked. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
rogers park bryan wrote: They'll hit on some of em. This, and/or, because of having that many early picks, they can trade for a guy that's already proven.
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
rogers park bryan wrote: You guys are acting like the Rams are so inept they should just close up shop They have arranged to have 9 picks in the first 2 rounds of the next three drafts. That's impressive. They'll hit on some of em. Even if Bradford doesnt work out, you can still get a bunch of good players and get a QB down the road. Nobody's saying they don't have a good outlook with those picks but it's kinda laughable to suggest a dynasty. They have a lot of picks, but they also have a ton of holes and might not have a good QB for all we know. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
FavreFan wrote: Nobody's saying they don't have a good outlook with those picks but it's kinda laughable to suggest a dynasty. Just as laughable when some packer fans talked about a dynasty less than 2 years ago.
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:20 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
Frank Coztansa wrote: FavreFan wrote: Nobody's saying they don't have a good outlook with those picks but it's kinda laughable to suggest a dynasty. Just as laughable when some packer fans talked about a dynasty less than 2 years ago.Not even close to the same thing. The Packers already have a SB title and the MVP. The Rams won 3 games. You're trying too hard Frank. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:53 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
Laughable. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Tue Mar 13, 2012 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Ram's Dynasty on Deck |
FavreFan wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: You guys are acting like the Rams are so inept they should just close up shop They have arranged to have 9 picks in the first 2 rounds of the next three drafts. That's impressive. They'll hit on some of em. Even if Bradford doesnt work out, you can still get a bunch of good players and get a QB down the road. Nobody's saying they don't have a good outlook with those picks but it's kinda laughable to suggest a dynasty. They have a lot of picks, but they also have a ton of holes and might not have a good QB for all we know. Exaggeration for effect. I wasnt literally predicting a dynasty. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|