Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
David Garrard to the Dolphins https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=68394 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | Chris_in_joliet [ Mon Mar 19, 2012 7:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | David Garrard to the Dolphins |
This pretty much locks in Alex Smith back to the 49ers now |
Author: | reents [ Mon Mar 19, 2012 9:18 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
That's what I'm Thinking, may just give him an extra million to make up for hard feelings. |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Mar 19, 2012 10:30 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
He'll be a solid backup for Tebow. |
Author: | Regular Reader [ Tue Mar 20, 2012 9:00 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: He'll be a solid backup for Tebow. The notion of Tebow in the Bay Area...... Then again, in certain areas it seems so right |
Author: | W_Z [ Tue Mar 20, 2012 7:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Sometimes I think you WANT us to fail. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 5:42 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Matt Moore is better. I don't get this, unless it's to be a backup. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 7:14 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Least exciting starting QB signing ever? They are a mess. Joey Porter and Ryan Clark just smacked Ireland in the media |
Author: | SHARK [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:46 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
FavreFan wrote: Matt Moore is better. I don't get this, unless it's to be a backup. Matt Moore did a pretty good job when he replaced Chad Henne down in Miami. I've got to think he's the #1 guy with the Dolphins when they report to Training Camp, while David Garrard didn't play a down last year with back surgery. As for Dolphins' Owner Stephen Ross, to coin a baseball term, talk about swinging & missing... |
Author: | Phil McCracken [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
rogers park bryan wrote: Least exciting starting QB signing ever? |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:48 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:52 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:56 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Not enough vowels in that name. Looks like a cheap knockoff that was spelled wrong. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 1:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Actually, as I recall people were pretty excited about this. He was the fourth in line Montana, Young, Garcia, Grbac A lot of Ravens fans were happy to get rid of Dilfer. Thought they'd be even more dominant with an actual offense |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:01 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
I suppose ill-advised might be more appropriate than excited. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:02 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I suppose ill-advised might be more appropriate than excited. Can you blame them, or anyone, for being excited to be rid of Trent Dilfer? |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
rogers park bryan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I suppose ill-advised might be more appropriate than excited. Can you blame them, or anyone, for being excited to be rid of Trent Dilfer? A little bit. They had just won something like 12 games in a row and the Super Bowl. |
Author: | Phil McCracken [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I suppose ill-advised might be more appropriate than excited. Can you blame them, or anyone, for being excited to be rid of Trent Dilfer? A little bit. They had just won something like 12 games in a row and the Super Bowl. Look, Keith Bogans wasn't working out so we signed Elvis |
Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Phil McCracken wrote: Look, Keith Bogans wasn't working out so we signed Elvis I think that's an exact quote from the Col. Tom Parker press release. |
Author: | rogers park bryan [ Wed Mar 21, 2012 2:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: David Garrard to the Dolphins |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I suppose ill-advised might be more appropriate than excited. Can you blame them, or anyone, for being excited to be rid of Trent Dilfer? A little bit. They had just won something like 12 games in a row and the Super Bowl. Not because of the offense In those last 11 games they gave up 7 or less points 8 times. I dont like game managers though |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |