| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Jim Schwartz https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=83979 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Jim Schwartz |
Good night, Sweet Prince |
|
| Author: | denisdman [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
He gone. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
|
|
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Just coming here to say the same thing. Gotta be done. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
I'd fire him tonight. |
|
| Author: | jimmypasta [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:56 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Have him join Matt Millen. They could get a local Detroit Radio Talk Show. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else.  Dude cmon man.
|
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 7:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous He would let those goons do whatever they want to do. That team needs, dare I say NEEDS discipline. That ain't Lovie. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous I'd be fine with the offense they have now. In fact, I don't want Lovie, if he hasn't changed, going near the offense at all - and I say that as a Lovie fan. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Darkside wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous He would let those goons do whatever they want to do. That team needs, dare I say NEEDS discipline. That ain't Lovie. They might not need discipline if you remove Schwartz's personality from the equation. Lovie would have that defense playing very well and the offense is good enough |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Darkside wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous He would let those goons do whatever they want to do. That team needs, dare I say NEEDS discipline. That ain't Lovie. Isn't it though? The Bears were pretty disciplined. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Either way, nagannahappon because he's in in Houston. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Darkside wrote: rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Good riddance. Semi-serious thought: Why not Lovie? Get a capable OC with a system that maximizes the talents of Bush, CJ, et al., and then have Lovie bring discipline everywhere else. Ive been beating that drum for a while. A coach to mesh that defense and play a more ball control offense and they'd be dangerous He would let those goons do whatever they want to do. That team needs, dare I say NEEDS discipline. That ain't Lovie. I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. |
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
veganfan21 wrote: I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. I disagree... a "players coach" means that he lets the players do whatever they want. I never saw Lovie as any kind of disciplinarian. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Darkside wrote: veganfan21 wrote: I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. I disagree... a "players coach" means that he lets the players do whatever they want. I never saw Lovie as any kind of disciplinarian. Make sense...okay let me ask you this: if we agree he's not a disciplinarian in the Coughlin and/or Cowher sense, would you also agree that his teams were disciplined anyway? I think both are true. |
|
| Author: | Juiced [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
DETROIT  The Bear and the Packer
|
|
| Author: | Darkside [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:11 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
veganfan21 wrote: Darkside wrote: veganfan21 wrote: I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. I disagree... a "players coach" means that he lets the players do whatever they want. I never saw Lovie as any kind of disciplinarian. Make sense...okay let me ask you this: if we agree he's not a disciplinarian in the Coughlin and/or Cowher sense, would you also agree that his teams were disciplined anyway? I think both are true. I did not think his teams were disciplined. Too many offsides, false starts.... not exactly disciplined IMHO |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
No way in the world do I want Lovie any where near Detroit. |
|
| Author: | lipidquadcab [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 8:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Maybe Phil Robertson can be the next coach... |
|
| Author: | sjboyd0137 [ Sun Dec 22, 2013 9:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
If my father in law had his way, Schwartz would be on his way out, now. It was a bit of a joy to watch the Lions choke while surrounded by Lions fans today. |
|
| Author: | IkeSouth [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
i was hilarious to be around bears fans as the bears choked today |
|
| Author: | JORR [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 7:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Darkside wrote: veganfan21 wrote: I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. I disagree... a "players coach" means that he lets the players do whatever they want. I never saw Lovie as any kind of disciplinarian. I don't think that's what "player's coach" means. What it means is a coach that doesn't show up at the press conference and say, "Well, it's hard to win when your quarterback is a piece of shit. We try to tell Jay what to do, but he's completely uncoachable. It's a fucking shame he is wasting all those tools." Even though it's true. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 8:13 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote: Darkside wrote: veganfan21 wrote: I don't think we see Lovie the same way. To me, Lovie's teams were very disciplined, especially compared to the zoo at Detroit. The guys didn't want to disappoint Lovie, and that bred its own kind of discipline in which everyone was wedded to the defensive system. I disagree... a "players coach" means that he lets the players do whatever they want. I never saw Lovie as any kind of disciplinarian. I don't think that's what "player's coach" means. What it means is a coach that doesn't show up at the press conference and say, "Well, it's hard to win when your quarterback is a piece of shit. We try to tell Jay what to do, but he's completely uncoachable. It's a fucking shame he is wasting all those tools." Even though it's true.
|
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 11:37 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
D line with tons of pressure is all about Lovie, then he can pretend to be a genius with his amazing secondary work. Everytime I hear Lovies defensive philosophy its Pressure the QB, LB's that can cover and a good safety!!!! That just leaves the 2 CB's that he doesnt need to be great. So give him 8 or 9 great players and he will give you a great defense!!!!! And he can bring Marinelli with him....ohhh....wait.... |
|
| Author: | good dolphin [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:17 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
The Lions will be a much more dangerous team in the division the day Schwartz is fired. |
|
| Author: | Hank Scorpio [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
good dolphin wrote: The Lions will be a much more dangerous team in the division the day Schwartz is fired. Hopefully they squandered the prime of Calvin Johnson and he starts to decline. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Dec 23, 2013 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Jim Schwartz |
good dolphin wrote: The Lions will be a much more dangerous team in the division the day Schwartz is fired. Same thing was sad when the last coach was fired. They will screw up the next coaching hire as well. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|