Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

ELIOT WOLF
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=91289		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  bigfan [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:19 pm ]
Post subject:  ELIOT WOLF
I asked one of my NFL guys, who he would hire and this is what I got.

Assuming the Bears are ready to hire an Football Overlord (Holmgren Type), then here is your GM. Yes, he looks 12, he is the youngest Pro Personnel director in the NFL.

he has been with the Packers for 11 years and is the son of Ron Wolf. Maybe you heard of Ron.

Does his father help him? Maybe...but you need to vet that info as well.

Your GM is not going to hire your coach, your Football Guru will...your GM is going to scout players and pick them. You need someone who has seen what the right way to do this is and the Packers have shown it.

Image
Author:  Northside_Dan [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Looks like a guy who enjoys tossing in a nice fat lipper.


I'm sold.
Author:  good dolphin [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.
Author:  Kirkwood [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:25 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
good dolphin wrote:
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.

^
Bad post.

The same warnings were given after the retirements of Ron and Brett. Yet, the beat still went on.
Author:  bigfan [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:26 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
good dolphin wrote:
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.


Image
Author:  Chus [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:50 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Image
Author:  Peoria Matt [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:06 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Nope. Not on the list or must not be one of George's contacts
Author:  Brick [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.

^
Bad post.

The same warnings were given after the retirements of Ron and Brett. Yet, the beat still went on.
What were you saying about Andrew Luck again?
Author:  Kirkwood [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.

^
Bad post.

The same warnings were given after the retirements of Ron and Brett. Yet, the beat still went on.
What were you saying about Andrew Luck again?

The cheap years of his contract are being wasted by his idiot GM. Luck is hiding a lot of poor decisions by his GM.
Author:  Brick [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:16 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
good dolphin wrote:
The Packers entire organization is based on one person. That thing is a house of cards with lots of people living off one person's "fabulous" light.

^
Bad post.

The same warnings were given after the retirements of Ron and Brett. Yet, the beat still went on.
What were you saying about Andrew Luck again?

The cheap years of his contract are being wasted by his idiot GM. Luck is hiding a lot of poor decisions by his GM.
As is Rodgers. Unless of course you don't think Rodgers is the best player in the game and even more valuable than Luck.
Author:  Kirkwood [ Tue Dec 30, 2014 2:22 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
As is Rodgers. Unless of course you don't think Rodgers is the best player in the game and even more valuable than Luck.

I think Luck is more valuable given his contract. Though, I don't think Thompson has done enough to maximize the Packers chances during Rodger's peak years. Some re-signing decisions and his refusal to participate in free agency is very frustrating.

He suffered a lull in his drafts but that's understandable when talent leaves out the door since it's highly sought after.
Author:  bigfan [ Fri Jan 02, 2015 3:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Wolf promoted today with a raise. Mark Murphy making sure the kid doesnt leave so fast.
Author:  reents [ Sat Jan 03, 2015 11:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Did I see Lake Dawson was up for this and is that good ole 87 from Notre Dame
Author:  bigfan [ Sun Jan 04, 2015 12:25 am ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
reents wrote:
Did I see Lake Dawson was up for this and is that good ole 87 from Notre Dame

Nobody was looking to hire Lake Dawson....or Lake Dawsons dad, but I am just guessing that one.
Author:  Nas [ Sun Jan 04, 2015 2:45 am ]
Post subject:  Re: ELIOT WOLF
Kirkwood wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
As is Rodgers. Unless of course you don't think Rodgers is the best player in the game and even more valuable than Luck.

I think Luck is more valuable given his contract. Though, I don't think Thompson has done enough to maximize the Packers chances during Rodger's peak years. Some re-signing decisions and his refusal to participate in free agency is very frustrating.

He suffered a lull in his drafts but that's understandable when talent leaves out the door since it's highly sought after.


Good dolphin is right. The Packers are a 2 win team without Rodgers. We saw that when he got hurt.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/