I was hoping for point after touchdown stats
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| PAT STAT https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=96897 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:41 am ] |
| Post subject: | PAT STAT |
Patriots have dropped back to pass 80% of the time in 4 games and they are 4-0 in those games. the rest of the league when dropping back to throw 80% of the time 3-109! |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Other than the Packers, nobody in the league can even come close to saying they have a better QB than the Pats do. What an obvious stat. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Other than the Packers, nobody in the league can even come close to saying they have a better QB than the Pats do. What an obvious stat. Add an asterisk to the part about NE having a good QB then we're good to go. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
veganfan21 wrote: Frank Coztansa wrote: Other than the Packers, nobody in the league can even come close to saying they have a better QB than the Pats do. What an obvious stat. Add an asterisk to the part about NE having a good QB then we're good to go. #Hater |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
I was hoping for point after touchdown stats
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Brady led the team in rushing and passing yards yesterday and 91% of the Pats offensive plays were passes. Jay Cutler is jealous but Tom Brady is clearly the greatest. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Frank Coztansa wrote: Other than the Packers, nobody in the league can even come close to saying they have a better QB than the Pats do. What an obvious stat. Teams rarely drop back 80% or more of the plays. Even last week when the Chargers threw 65 times, for the 15th most yards in a game...that was still only 75% of the time. The parameter of throwing 80% of the time, being the qualifier here brings into account 112 games probably going back 20+ years. So, this has nothing to do with Tom Brady being compared the players today but for most of modern football. Thus not making it so "Obvious" SMH! |
|
| Author: | Scorehead [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
So Dan Fouts is not the best QB of all time? |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:10 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Scorehead wrote: So Dan Fouts is not the best QB of all time? You will need to get me Fouts 80% drop back and throw games....got a feeling it isnt more than 3! 
|
|
| Author: | ZephMarshack [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:26 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
The poor aggregate record of teams dropping back that frequently is the inverse of the stat that's supposed to demonstrate the success of teams that run the ball a given number of times. Both are instances of correlation not equaling causation; teams that have to pass that much are most often trailing. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
ZephMarshack wrote: The poor aggregate record of teams dropping back that frequently is the inverse of the stat that's supposed to demonstrate the success of teams that run the ball a given number of times. Both are instances of correlation not equaling causation; teams that have to pass that much are most often trailing. I agree, it is rarely the game plan to throw that much thus the trailing team throwing. It is impressive, as I think last year, they had a game that they ran a ton. Also, I understand many of these throws are dump off passes, yet it is amazing how often they are wide open...almost like they know the plays are coming! 
|
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 1:45 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
G.O.P. wrote: Matt Spiegel mentioned this exact stat in Transition so he could sound smart. He must read this board. It was on NFL network around 10:30 AM...might have it on in the studio? |
|
| Author: | KDdidit [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Sucks if you started Blount because you thought he'd have a big day with Dion Lewis out (fine with me since I have Lewis). |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:21 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Through six games, Brady is playing better than Rodgers, I think. I'd still take Rodgers first if I had one game to win. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
KDdidit wrote: Sucks if you started Blount because you thought he'd have a big day with Dion Lewis out (fine with me since I have Lewis). Its what makes the Pats so damn awesome. Everyone thinks one thing, they go the other. Continue to say it, but drafting brady wasnt the 1st round lock and then you spend a career trying to defend the fact that the QB carried you and it was a cant miss guy. Not only is he a 6th rounder, but the fact they kept 4 QB's just to be able to keep him on the roster is doubling down, then after he threw all of 3 passes in the regular season the next season you keep 2 QBs, no emergnecy QB at that time. Then of course told Bledsoe, thanks for the lung puncture...but...this guy will be our QB from now on. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
FavreFan wrote: Through six games, Brady is playing better than Rodgers, I think. I'd still take Rodgers first if I had one game to win. And if there was no time for film study. |
|
| Author: | bigfan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Through six games, Brady is playing better than Rodgers, I think. I'd still take Rodgers first if I had one game to win. And if there was no time for film study. WOW....lol.... |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Oct 26, 2015 3:25 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Through six games, Brady is playing better than Rodgers, I think. I'd still take Rodgers first if I had one game to win. And if there was no time for film study. Yup. Rodgers plays the game The Right Way. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Fri Oct 30, 2015 9:41 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
The White Sox have won a World Series championship more recently than Tom Brady has lost an October game at home. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Fri Oct 30, 2015 10:05 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: PAT STAT |
Frank Coztansa wrote: The White Sox have won a World Series championship more recently than Tom Brady has lost an October game at home. 
|
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|