Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Steelers/Broncos
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=98304		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  sjboyd0137 [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Steelers/Broncos
3 pretty fun games so far this weekend...do we get a fourth, or do the fact that 2 crippled QB's are starting this game mean it's going to be a 6-3 suck fest?
Author:  denisdman [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:27 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
It's been decent on balance. Regardless we have the Hawks at 6:00 in case the Steelers choke on Beardown ether.
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Very mild weather for Diiiinver in mid January. Even the backups can get both teams over 20 points each.
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:38 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
denisdman wrote:
It's been decent on balance. Regardless we have the Hawks at 6:00 in case the Steelers choke on Beardown ether.

Yeah, final Divisional game is building a bridge to Habs @ Hawks and UFC card on FS1 at 7 tonight.
Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
sjboyd0137 wrote:
3 pretty fun games so far this weekend...do we get a fourth, or do the fact that 2 crippled QB's are starting this game mean it's going to be a 6-3 suck fest?


3? Pats KC sucked and so did the Panthers Seachickens....you're easily entertained
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:11 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Good to know Jay Feely will be on standby in case the need arises for any more punting-related commentary.

That really enhances the broadcast.
Author:  Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
No shit.

"Yeah, the wind affected the snap which lead to a bad punt which the wind affected as well"

Awesome. I never would have understood what happened if it wasn't for that Santoesque breakdown.
Author:  Tad Queasy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:29 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Strong winds can move stuff that doesn't really weigh a lot.

That's the kind of tremendous insight one can only glean from 14 years in the NFL.
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Enjoy that last Stillers drive. 1 yard, 1 yard, sack!!

This Bronco play action is looking very effective. P-E-Y under center is a better way to go. Open and unblocked blitz will still get you in a 7 step drop or shotgun just the same.
Author:  Godfella [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:49 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Phil Simms is turrible just turrible.
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 5:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Another Stillers drive. 1, 7, 0, punt. :lol: :lol:
Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:37 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Some football 5 FG's...boring...probably couldn't say that in Wisconsin
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
I hope CJ Anderson got the plate number of the truck that just ran him over.
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Walt Williams Neck wrote:
Some football 5 FG's...boring...probably couldn't say that in Wisconsin

Make it 6 FG's. Only another 17 points to the over, entering the 4th quarter.
Author:  pittmike [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:30 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
A lot of unhappy people here lol
Author:  donspiracy [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:45 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
pittmike wrote:
A lot of unhappy people here lol

Why, did they take the under? ??? :wink:
Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:48 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
Can you Imagine Denver / New England?
Author:  veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:51 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
donspiracy wrote:
pittmike wrote:
A lot of unhappy people here lol

Why, did they take the under? ??? :wink:


I think he means in Pittsburgh. Sucks because I think the Steelers probably have the most talent on offense when healthy. They wouldn't have lost to a disabled senior citizen had Bell and Brown played.
Author:  pittmike [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:52 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
veganfan21 wrote:
donspiracy wrote:
pittmike wrote:
A lot of unhappy people here lol

Why, did they take the under? ??? :wink:


I think he means in Pittsburgh. Sucks because I think the Steelers probably have the most talent on offense when healthy. They wouldn't have lost to a disabled senior citizen had Bell and Brown played.


Pretty much. They were hurt all year.
Author:  pittmike [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
That field goal helped people betting steelers btw.
Author:  leashyourkids [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:55 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
veganfan21 wrote:
donspiracy wrote:
pittmike wrote:
A lot of unhappy people here lol

Why, did they take the under? ??? :wink:


I think he means in Pittsburgh. Sucks because I think the Steelers probably have the most talent on offense when healthy. They wouldn't have lost to a disabled senior citizen had Bell and Brown played.


I'm pretty sure he means they're unhappy because they live in Pittsburgh.
Author:  veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:56 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
leashyourkids wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
donspiracy wrote:
pittmike wrote:
A lot of unhappy people here lol

Why, did they take the under? ??? :wink:


I think he means in Pittsburgh. Sucks because I think the Steelers probably have the most talent on offense when healthy. They wouldn't have lost to a disabled senior citizen had Bell and Brown played.


I'm pretty sure he means they're unhappy because they live in Pittsburgh.


:lol: :lol:
Author:  Jaw Breaker [ Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:08 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Steelers/Broncos
pittmike wrote:
That field goal helped people betting steelers btw.


Dat's right! :mrgreen:
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/