This is just crazy.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Larry Fitzgerald https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=98399 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | RFDC [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 2:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Larry Fitzgerald |
This is just crazy.
|
|
| Author: | Nas [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. |
|
| Author: | donspiracy [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:33 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Randy Moss and...? |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 3:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
donspiracy wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Randy Moss and...? Rice |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Way to jinx him, RFDC. |
|
| Author: | nancykwan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Wow. Now all we need is the guy who thinks Fouts is the best qb ever. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 12:38 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
nancykwan wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Wow. Now all we need is the guy who thinks Fouts is the best qb ever. I liked Fouts. He was always an ALCOA Fantastic Finish away from Voyagers! |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Rice, Moss, and TO were better. Fitz is up there though. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
FavreFan wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Rice, Moss, and TO were better. Fitz is up there though. I am with you on Rice and Moss, but not sure I agree on TO. What made him better than Fitz? |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:58 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
I don't think Fitzgerald is a slam dunk top 4. There are other guys in that conversation who could be argued as better... Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Steve Smith, Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Cris Carter, Devin Hester, David Terrell, etc. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 9:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
leashyourkids wrote: I don't think Fitzgerald is a slam dunk top 4. There are other guys in that conversation who could be argued as better... Calvin Johnson, Andre Johnson, Steve Smith, Torry Holt, Isaac Bruce, Cris Carter, Devin Hester, David Terrell, etc. Ricky Proehl |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Rice, Moss, and TO were better. Fitz is up there though. I am with you on Rice and Moss, but not sure I agree on TO. What made him better than Fitz? Fitz isn't done, but currently, TO beats him in basically every significant statistical category. Touchdowns isn't even close. It's like TO 160, Fitz 95. Again, Fitz isn't done yet, though. |
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
leashyourkids wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Rice, Moss, and TO were better. Fitz is up there though. I am with you on Rice and Moss, but not sure I agree on TO. What made him better than Fitz? Fitz isn't done, but currently, TO beats him in basically every significant statistical category. Touchdowns isn't even close. It's like TO 160, Fitz 95. Again, Fitz isn't done yet, though. yeah I was surprised he is ahead by so many. Maybe I am swayed because I never really liked TO. If I had a big game to play in, I think I would rather roll with Fitz than TO. But yeah by stats gotta say TO is the better WR. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:10 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
I'd probably take Fitz in one game, as he's more consistent and has better hands. I don't like TO, either... the one area I would give him an edge physically, though, is he was more of a deep threat. His average yards per catch is higher, but it does look like Fitz will well surpass him in terms of catches, though, so Fitz is probably a better possession receiver. |
|
| Author: | Hockey Gay [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:12 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Popcorn in the face, dancing with cheerleaders and celebrating on the Dallas star. TO by a landslide. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:19 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Hockey Gay wrote: Popcorn in the face, dancing with cheerleaders and celebrating on the Dallas star. TO by a landslide. Don't forget the Vicodin overdose. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
If memory serves T.O. was pretty money in big games. Had a great Super Bowl and had that catch to beat the Packers on the last play |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 10:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
leashyourkids wrote: Hockey Gay wrote: Popcorn in the face, dancing with cheerleaders and celebrating on the Dallas star. TO by a landslide. Don't forget the Vicodin overdose. 
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
TO was awesome. I'd take him over Moss. Like RPB mentioned, he showed up in big games, made his teams better(although he wore out his welcome quickly), and is one of the toughest players I've ever seen play. He wasn't supposed to have a chance to play in that SB. If McNabb had half the heart TO had, Philly would have beaten the Patriots in that game. Longevity matters if we are talking careers, but if we are also just going off best guy we've ever seen, Antonio Brown has to be in the conversation now too. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Difficult to rank WRs because they're so dependent on the QB. Would Fitz have double the production if he hadn't been stuck with trash in between Warner and Palmer? |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
veganfan21 wrote: Difficult to rank WRs because they're so dependent on the QB. Would Fitz have double the production if he hadn't been stuck with trash in between Warner and Palmer? Part of being a great receiver is forcing yourself out of situations with bad QB's via holdouts and trade demands |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Difficult to rank WRs because they're so dependent on the QB. Would Fitz have double the production if he hadn't been stuck with trash in between Warner and Palmer? Part of being a great receiver is forcing yourself out of situations with bad QB's via holdouts and trade demands And calling your quarterback gay. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
leashyourkids wrote: RFDC wrote: FavreFan wrote: Nas wrote: He's the 3rd best WR I have ever seen. Rice, Moss, and TO were better. Fitz is up there though. I am with you on Rice and Moss, but not sure I agree on TO. What made him better than Fitz? Fitz isn't done, but currently, TO beats him in basically every significant statistical category. Touchdowns isn't even close. It's like TO 160, Fitz 95. Again, Fitz isn't done yet, though. Fitzgerald played with some awful quarterbacks. That really hurt his numbers. Give him a decent QB for most of his career and his numbers would be even better. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
FavreFan wrote: TO was awesome. I'd take him over Moss. Like RPB mentioned, he showed up in big games, made his teams better(although he wore out his welcome quickly), and is one of the toughest players I've ever seen play. He wasn't supposed to have a chance to play in that SB. If McNabb had half the heart TO had, Philly would have beaten the Patriots in that game. Longevity matters if we are talking careers, but if we are also just going off best guy we've ever seen, Antonio Brown has to be in the conversation now too. Considering he's only 27 (I think), I don't think he's there yet, but if he maintains his production, he's gonna have some outstanding numbers. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
rogers park bryan wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Difficult to rank WRs because they're so dependent on the QB. Would Fitz have double the production if he hadn't been stuck with trash in between Warner and Palmer? Part of being a great receiver is forcing yourself out of situations with bad QB's via holdouts and trade demands Hey, worked for this guy: 
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 1:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
leashyourkids wrote: FavreFan wrote: TO was awesome. I'd take him over Moss. Like RPB mentioned, he showed up in big games, made his teams better(although he wore out his welcome quickly), and is one of the toughest players I've ever seen play. He wasn't supposed to have a chance to play in that SB. If McNabb had half the heart TO had, Philly would have beaten the Patriots in that game. Longevity matters if we are talking careers, but if we are also just going off best guy we've ever seen, Antonio Brown has to be in the conversation now too. Considering he's only 27 (I think), I don't think he's there yet, but if he maintains his production, he's gonna have some outstanding numbers. Right, career wise he's not there right now, and probably won't get there. But if we remove longevity and just talk about the best WR's we've ever watched, he's already in the top 5, IMO. I think he probably has the most impact that any non-QB does on the game right now. |
|
| Author: | nancykwan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Andre Reed better than Fitz. |
|
| Author: | spmack [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
nancykwan wrote: Andre Reed better than Fitz. That's a fat(dick)head thought. |
|
| Author: | JBills [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
Even though his teams haven't made a dent in the playoffs I would say Megatron is a peg higher on my list than TO... Owens was mega talented, but also a constant fucking headache in the locker room. 1. Rice 2. Moss 3. Johnson 4. Owens Also lets not forget about Julio Jones if we're talking about today's best. He may be the most physically gifted WR in the NFL. |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 6:32 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Larry Fitzgerald |
JBills wrote: Tim Tebow
Tim Tebow Tim Tebow Tim Tebow |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|