| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Super Bowl L https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=90&t=98409 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:52 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Super Bowl L |
I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 9:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. Couldn't the same be said of Carolina? They gave up only 12 more points than Denver did during the regular season despite scoring at a more rapid pace (145 more points scored than Denver in 2015), which gives opposing offenses more chances to score. Plus if Carolina starts fast, as they did against Arizona and GB, I'm not sure if Denver can catch up. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Yes, it could. |
|
| Author: | Chus [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Panthers open as a 3.5/4 point favorite. |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
The Patriots aren't playing, so we are all winners. I'm rooting for Carolina simply because of Rivera. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:35 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Carolina and give the points. They are destroying everyone this year. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
I definitely like Carolina, but I do think it's funny that I'm already hearing it sucks Denver won because it won't even be a game. Denver beat the Pats twice this year. Probably fair to say they are the better team, and certainly not worse. |
|
| Author: | leashyourkids [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
I'll take Fox Mulder + alien DNA |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
I'm rooting for Denver because...Yay! Old guys! Don Pierson can print his 37-year-old QB story again with the 7/9 find and replace function. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
FavreFan wrote: I definitely like Carolina, but I do think it's funny that I'm already hearing it sucks Denver won because it won't even be a game. Denver beat the Pats twice this year. Probably fair to say they are the better team, and certainly not worse. I think it's because if the Panthers get out in front, whether by offense or converting TOs into points, I don't think Denver can keep up with Manning leading things. Sure they beat the Pats by having the defense impose its will on Brady, but if for some reason that doesn't work against Newton, then Denver might be in trouble. Not sure you could say that about the Pats. They'll always be within striking distance. |
|
| Author: | Crystal Lake Hoffy [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm rooting for Denver because...Yay! Old guys! Don Pierson can print his 37-year-old QB story again with the 7/9 find and replace function. Speaking of old guys, watched the new Star Wars with the kid again and when Han Solo crashes the falcon, she said, "see, even in the future old people can't drive. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 10:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm rooting for Denver because...Yay! Old guys! Don Pierson can print his 37-year-old QB story again with the 7/9 find and replace function. Speaking of old guys, watched the new Star Wars with the kid again and when Han Solo crashes the falcon, she said, "see, even in the future old people can't drive. You should have told her that it was actually a long, long time ago. |
|
| Author: | Hockey Gay [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:16 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
veganfan21 wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. Couldn't the same be said of Carolina?. No. They played no one. |
|
| Author: | veganfan21 [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Hockey Gay wrote: veganfan21 wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. Couldn't the same be said of Carolina?. No. They played no one. I don't know about that. They've beaten every top ten offense they've played this year: Arizona (second in offense) NO twice Seattle twice Washington NYG |
|
| Author: | W_Z [ Sun Jan 24, 2016 11:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
the fast start carolina has been getting is what makes me think this will be over by halftime. the denver D is great, but arizona's D was good all year too. not to mention that manning's going to be a sitting duck sometimes and the carolina D is fast and strong. i want manning to get another ring and he'll certainly earn it if they beat this team. i think carolina leaves atlanta with the only NFC south team without a championship in a few weeks. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 3:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
FavreFan wrote: I definitely like Carolina, but I do think it's funny that I'm already hearing it sucks Denver won because it won't even be a game. Denver beat the Pats twice this year. Probably fair to say they are the better team, and certainly not worse. A lot of people believed the winner of the NFC game today would win it all, Patriots won a lot of games this year with a very bad line and not much talent on either side of the ball. Denver has a great defense but their offense hasn't looked real good all year. |
|
| Author: | Hussra [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:34 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
overall strength of schedule: Denver 13 Carolina 31 defensive strength of schedule (how good were the offenses they faced): Denver 4 Carolina 26 offensive strength of schedule (how good were the defenses they faced): Denver 17 Carolina 32 |
|
| Author: | Frank Coztansa [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 7:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Carolina is going to roll again. I don't think it will be as lopsided as last night or the first half against Seattle, but I don't think Dinver is ever really going to be 'in it.' I think the final score should ends up something like this: Carolina GOQbovs 34 Denver Elmhurst Steves 23 |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:17 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
|
|
|
| Author: | doug - evergreen park [ Mon Jan 25, 2016 8:56 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Crystal Lake Hoffy wrote: Speaking of old guys, watched the new Star Wars with the kid again and when Han Solo crashes the falcon, she said, "see, even in the future old people can't drive. You should have told her that it was actually a long, long time ago.  I put $5 on Denver in March to win the SB at 12-1, but I don't think they can pull this off. |
|
| Author: | Dr. Kenneth Noisewater [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. 
|
|
| Author: | Chus [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote: I'm looking forward to this one. Should be great. I'll take Denver. That D is the difference. 
|
|
| Author: | Hussra [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 1:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
Hussra wrote: overall strength of schedule:
Denver 13 Carolina 31 defensive strength of schedule (how good were the offenses they faced): Denver 4 Carolina 26 offensive strength of schedule (how good were the defenses they faced): Denver 17 Carolina 32 |
|
| Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 6:52 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
rogers park bryan wrote: 
|
|
| Author: | BigW72 [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 9:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
I had no horse in this race, but watched the game with friends. Carolina seemed to overthink their offense. They looked nothing like the team that played all season. Also that Defensive holding penalty giving Denver a first down was garbage. Not sure it would have made a difference but it did end the game for Carolina. Bad game. bad product. The NFL blows. |
|
| Author: | Colonel Angus [ Mon Feb 08, 2016 11:43 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Super Bowl L |
The Panthers took a page from the Cubs & decided to not show up when it counts the most. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|