JBills wrote:
FavreFan... Um... Idk how to say this, but your NBA cred takes a hit when you dont acknowledge still late prime Shaq on that 2006 team. Damn. I thought u knew ure shit a little.
And Duncan doesnt win without Parker or Ginobili.
Damn dude. Did you just start watching the league a few years ago or what?
In my book, quitting is quitting. Ive seen the 2 best players in the league both leave effort on the court at dif points in their careers. It doesnt bother me.
1.) And this goes to HOVA too - I said All Star caliber for a reason. Of course Shaq was an all star because of his popularity. I dont give a shit about NBA cred around here, but I feel just fine saying Shaq wasn't a top quality player by that point and one of the worst "2nd best guys on a champion" in recent memory. I think you have a pretty misguided definition of prime if you think 2006 Shaq was anywhere near his, even the late stages. He hadn't had a truly dominant game in 2+ years by that point. Nobody was worried about him by the 2006 postseason.
2.) Parker was so badly destroyed by Kidd in the '03 Finals that he was wooed by them the entire summer. All the stories kept saying how Pop didn't trust Parker and they needed a better option going forward. Thats why I said '03 Duncan. I suggest you either learn to comprehend or learn a little about the league first before criticizing someone else's percieved lack of NBA knowledge, because you have quite a bit to learn yourself apparently.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
