It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:06 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 286 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

Does Reggie Miller Belong in the Hall of Fame?
Yes 89%  89%  [ 33 ]
No 11%  11%  [ 4 ]
Total votes : 37
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
For the record Alex English should be a HoFer.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 3:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Also, I'm not sure why Bagels believes I'm getting "pwnd". I think I'm making pretty good points and backing them up. As far as Rodman's inflated rebounds are concerned, I am finding hard to believe that this is the first time hardcore fans of "The League" have heard such a thing..


you're not backing them up though. your point about Rodman getting extra rebounds from tipping the ball to himself is ridiculous and has been refuted. you saying it's hard to believe others haven't heard of it might hold weight if say, any person posting in this thread agreed with you? i certainly don't agree with everything RFDC or FF says but you are the only crackpot here with this opinion that these 'extra rebounds' are inflating his stats.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:32 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Also, I'm not sure why Bagels believes I'm getting "pwnd". I think I'm making pretty good points and backing them up. As far as Rodman's inflated rebounds are concerned, I am finding hard to believe that this is the first time hardcore fans of "The League" have heard such a thing..


you're not backing them up though. your point about Rodman getting extra rebounds from tipping the ball to himself is ridiculous and has been refuted. you saying it's hard to believe others haven't heard of it might hold weight if say, any person posting in this thread agreed with you? i certainly don't agree with everything RFDC or FF says but you are the only crackpot here with this opinion that these 'extra rebounds' are inflating his stats.


How has it been refuted? By you saying it didn't happen? How is that different than me saying it did? Crackpot? A bunch of knuckleheads are telling me that guys who were playing in All-Star games every season while Rodman was blowing his cash at the craps tables in Vegas and getting blown by transvestite hookers are suddenly less deserving of the Hall of Fame than a guy who was never considered as good as they were while their careers were ongoing. And I'm the crackpot?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 31, 2009 11:49 pm
Posts: 7806
Location: Permanent hiatus
pizza_Place: Ban me
Only person who appears not to believe Rodman was good is you. Everyone considered Rodman great. He sacrificed in ways many people wouldn't.

_________________
spanky wrote:
Elmhurst Steve wrote:
In the grand SCEME (not scope, Dumbass) pf things

Awesome.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 4:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
You're saying a bunch of blatantly false shit JORR. Buck Williams was never considered a better player than Dennis Rodman. Rodman didn't get credited for any more non-rebounds than anyone else that played. Scoring is not more important than defense and rebounding. Usually your sports thoughts are more lucid than this one but yeah, Dennis Rodman was a phenomenal basketball player. Unequivocally, one of the five best rebounders and possible one of the five best defenders in the history of the sport. Buck Williams was a pretty good player that had a couple very good seasons and made a few all star games. Alex English was a very good scorer, but didn't have a transcendent skill like Rodman had and didn't impact games like Rodman did.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:56 pm
Posts: 37958
Location: ...
what the fuck does dennis rodman have to do with reggie miller belonging in the hall of fame? what a waste of a derailment of a thread.

christ, yes, he's a HOFer. anybody who looks solely at numbers for basketball HOF consideration is missing the point. but BC does that an awful lot. his avatar remains the best part of his posts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:46 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
I'm not reading all of this, so who voted no?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
immessedup17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I remember you taking a lot of heat for comparing Deng to Carmelo. You were ridiculed. That isn't quite so ridiculous now, is it? Take a victory lap, kid.

Yeah, but I don't need people here to start agreeing with me in order to feel validated. Deng has always been valuable, no one else noticed.

Luol Deng is a better overall player than Carmelo. He is also more valuable to a team.

Everyone's known Deng was valuable for years now. The only question about him was his injury history.

Carmelo is better than Luol Deng.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
W_Z wrote:
what the fuck does dennis rodman have to do with reggie miller belonging in the hall of fame? what a waste of a derailment of a thread.

christ, yes, he's a HOFer. anybody who looks solely at numbers for basketball HOF consideration is missing the point. but BC does that an awful lot. his avatar remains the best part of his posts.

This was way more interesting than the usual thread derailment pseudo-topics.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 1:23 pm
Posts: 16779
pizza_Place: Little Caesar's
immessedup17 wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I remember you taking a lot of heat for comparing Deng to Carmelo. You were ridiculed. That isn't quite so ridiculous now, is it? Take a victory lap, kid.

Yeah, but I don't need people here to start agreeing with me in order to feel validated. Deng has always been valuable, no one else noticed.

I also noticed. Take another lap, champ.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Also, I'm not sure why Bagels believes I'm getting "pwnd". I think I'm making pretty good points and backing them up. As far as Rodman's inflated rebounds are concerned, I am finding hard to believe that this is the first time hardcore fans of "The League" have heard such a thing..


you're not backing them up though. your point about Rodman getting extra rebounds from tipping the ball to himself is ridiculous and has been refuted. you saying it's hard to believe others haven't heard of it might hold weight if say, any person posting in this thread agreed with you? i certainly don't agree with everything RFDC or FF says but you are the only crackpot here with this opinion that these 'extra rebounds' are inflating his stats.


How has it been refuted? By you saying it didn't happen? How is that different than me saying it did? Crackpot? A bunch of knuckleheads are telling me that guys who were playing in All-Star games every season while Rodman was blowing his cash at the craps tables in Vegas and getting blown by transvestite hookers are suddenly less deserving of the Hall of Fame than a guy who was never considered as good as they were while their careers were ongoing. And I'm the crackpot?


sorry JORR....when you're the one tossing out a pretty strange argument like the tips=rebounds argument it's on you to prove it, not me. yes, it has been refuted. it's ridiculous. YOU show ME proof that it's true. come tell us some JORR story about how you know a NBA scorer from high school who worked every game Rodman played in and was directly responsible for inflating his rebounding numbers, i'm sure it's coming soon enough anyway. and what does Rodman's extracirricular activities have anything to do with his play? Barkley was pretty much an alcoholic , seemed to work out OK for him. who cares what the hell the guy did off the court as long as his play was solid


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 7:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
W_Z wrote:
what the fuck does dennis rodman have to do with reggie miller belonging in the hall of fame? what a waste of a derailment of a thread.
.


Joe Orr Road Rod is Joe Orr Rodding this thread


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 8:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
More than Rodman does.


I must have missed Reggies rings? Rodman did one thing as good as anyone ever. I know many people say that if they wanted to just rebound they could have done that too? they just didnt?

Rodman was relentless when he was with the Pistons...he was just good with the Bulls.

Reggie had a great shot, congrats. Posted up smaller guards and shot 3's. Great player, not HOF

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Feb 25, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17984
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Sorry JORR, but I'm pretty sure you might be the only person on this board who has even entertained the theory that Rodman was credited "extra rebounds." What you are insinuating is that the NBA found a benefit in possibly providing of the biggest troublemakers in the league padded statistics for... what reason?

Rodman was the best rebounder in the history of the league, period. He showed no trade-off between offensive and defensive rebounding rates.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:22 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Rodman was the best rebounder in the history of the league, period.


I'm not sure that's true. But even if I grant that it is, I don't think it makes Rodman a better player than guys who were premium scorers and playing in All-Star games while he was sitting at home. Are you really saying that somebody made a mistake in selecting Reggie Miller to the All-Star game five times and Rodman really should have been there instead?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:31 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
Bagels wrote:
who cares what the hell the guy did off the court as long as his play was solid


You're completely missing the point. Are you even reading what I'm writing? I love Rodman the character. I think the shit he did off the court was great. What you seem to be suggesting is that there were players who were perennial All-Stars in the prime of their careers- guys like Alex English (8 times), Reggie Miller (5 times), Shawn Kemp (6 times and he chewed on Rodman's "great defense" in the '96 finals), yet all those guys who were playing in those All-Star games weren't really as good as Dennis Rodman when we look back on it.

Let me ask you a question Mr. NBA. Is there a guy like that now? Who is being overlooked as an All-Star almost every year, but who, in fifteen or twenty years you will argue was better than guys like Carmelo Anthony or Chris Paul?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:32 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
Quote:
I've never mentioned Glenn Robinson in this entire thread.


You made the blanket statement that anyone who averages 21 ppg is better than anyone who averages 7 ppg.


Can you show me that? Please use the quote function.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:35 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
HOVA wrote:
Only person who appears not to believe Rodman was good is you. Everyone considered Rodman great. He sacrificed in ways many people wouldn't.


Who the fuck are you talking to? Show me one time in this entire fucking thread where I said Rodman was less than good. You're rewriting history. Rodman was never considered a great team player. He was viewed as a pain in the ass.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:41 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
FavreFan wrote:
You're saying a bunch of blatantly false shit JORR. Buck Williams was never considered a better player than Dennis Rodman. Rodman didn't get credited for any more non-rebounds than anyone else that played. Scoring is not more important than defense and rebounding. Usually your sports thoughts are more lucid than this one but yeah, Dennis Rodman was a phenomenal basketball player. Unequivocally, one of the five best rebounders and possible one of the five best defenders in the history of the sport. Buck Williams was a pretty good player that had a couple very good seasons and made a few all star games. Alex English was a very good scorer, but didn't have a transcendent skill like Rodman had and didn't impact games like Rodman did.


Of course, Buck Williams was considered better than Rodman. If Rodman was considered as great as you think, why did he only make two All-Star teams in his long career? Alex English was an eight time All-Star who averaged 22 points per game- closer to 30 in his prime. You've already advised me that one has to watch these players. I'm relatively certain you never saw Alex English and I know you never saw Bill Bridges. Doesn't that excuse you from this conversation?

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
W_Z wrote:
what the fuck does dennis rodman have to do with reggie miller belonging in the hall of fame? what a waste of a derailment of a thread.


Couldn't that be said about nearly every thread on this fucking board? "Derailment" generally means when the conversation takes a turn you're not interested in.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:43 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
There. I think I've answered all of you. Now, go on about your lives with your wrong thoughts.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 2:28 pm
Posts: 29948
Location: SW Burbs
You're late for church, JORR.

_________________
FavreFan wrote:
Im pretty hammered right now.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:08 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 80113
Location: Rogers Park, USA
pizza_Place: JB Alberto's
spanky wrote:
You're late for church, JORR.


:lol: I might have to miss it today. I'm going to sit around at home trying to figure out how exactly this great legendary player who was always considered so much better than every All-Star was traded for Will Perdue.

_________________
Ecclesiastes 5:8


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Bagels wrote:
who cares what the hell the guy did off the court as long as his play was solid


You're completely missing the point. Are you even reading what I'm writing? I love Rodman the character. I think the shit he did off the court was great. What you seem to be suggesting is that there were players who were perennial All-Stars in the prime of their careers- guys like Alex English (8 times), Reggie Miller (5 times), Shawn Kemp (6 times and he chewed on Rodman's "great defense" in the '96 finals), yet all those guys who were playing in those All-Star games weren't really as good as Dennis Rodman when we look back on it.

Let me ask you a question Mr. NBA. Is there a guy like that now? Who is being overlooked as an All-Star almost every year, but who, in fifteen or twenty years you will argue was better than guys like Carmelo Anthony or Chris Paul?


Your argument is now based on all-star appearances? tell me, what do you think the fans and the NBA would rather see in the all-star game, scoring and flashy passing or defense and rebounding??? of course defense is undervalued, and by sheer rebounding numbers there were times he couldn't be passed by. the problem is he was a pretty unique player and it's hard to categorize him by comparing to someone like Reggie Miller.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 8:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 30, 2011 10:15 am
Posts: 27591
pizza_Place: nick n vito's
:lol: @ this thread first of all it is a dumb question..have any of you seen who is in the basketball hall of fame? most are no names and scrubs..women are in there..who are the 3 dumb asses who voted no?

_________________
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
Laurence Holmes is a fucking weirdo, a nerd in denial, and a wannabe. Not a very good radio host either.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Quote:
I've never mentioned Glenn Robinson in this entire thread.


You made the blanket statement that anyone who averages 21 ppg is better than anyone who averages 7 ppg.


Can you show me that? Please use the quote function.

Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You don't need stats. Your eyes should tell you Rodman was a great player, a greater one than guys like Alex English and Kiki Vandeweghe.


My eyes don't tell me a guy who was never more than the third best player on any team he played on and averaged 7 ppg for his career was better than guys who averaged 22 regardless of how great you think his defense was. That's like saying Marty Marion is more deserving of the Hall of Fame than Michael Young. Neither one probably bleongs but there isn't much argument about who had the better career. Yeah, Rodman happened to be a great fit as a complementary player on a couple dynastic teams. That might even be enough for him to be considered a Hall of Fame player. But to say he's better than guys who carried their teams and were premium scorers in the league seems silly to me.


The last thing I'll reiterate here is that you are vastly underestimating the impact of pace of play through eras. Alex English would have averaged more like 16 ppg if he played on the Knicks in the late 90's and his team only had 80 possessions instead of 130. Same with players like Bill Bridges. Oscar's triple double is equivalent to about a 27-7-7 by today's pace of play. Stop looking at raw numbers, especially ppg, without context. It's no use.

And the "You didn't see him play" argument is bullshit. I'm pretty sure you never saw Dolph Schayes play(unless I'm wrong for thinking you said you were about 50) yet you have an opinion on him. You had an opinion on Merckle's generation and how they played the game but I'm pretty sure you never saw all of them play. Judging by the fact that everyone in this thread thinks you are wrong maybe it's you who should excuse himself. I've seen enough games from Alex English and Dennis Rodman to know who the better player was. I guess you didnt.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
You're saying a bunch of blatantly false shit JORR. Buck Williams was never considered a better player than Dennis Rodman. Rodman didn't get credited for any more non-rebounds than anyone else that played. Scoring is not more important than defense and rebounding. Usually your sports thoughts are more lucid than this one but yeah, Dennis Rodman was a phenomenal basketball player. Unequivocally, one of the five best rebounders and possible one of the five best defenders in the history of the sport. Buck Williams was a pretty good player that had a couple very good seasons and made a few all star games. Alex English was a very good scorer, but didn't have a transcendent skill like Rodman had and didn't impact games like Rodman did.


Of course, Buck Williams was considered better than Rodman. If Rodman was considered as great as you think, why did he only make two All-Star teams in his long career? Alex English was an eight time All-Star who averaged 22 points per game- closer to 30 in his prime. You've already advised me that one has to watch these players. I'm relatively certain you never saw Alex English and I know you never saw Bill Bridges. Doesn't that excuse you from this conversation?

I'm pretty sure the fact that you rank players based on AS appearances excuses you from this conversation.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:34 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17984
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Are you really saying that somebody made a mistake in selecting Reggie Miller to the All-Star game five times and Rodman really should have been there instead?


Not at all. The All-Star game is a show for fans, and fans like to watch scoring. It makes sense why Reggie Miller would be voted on to more All-Star games than Rodman. That has nothing to do with whether Rodman was the best rebounder in the league from an effectiveness standpoint.

Which, of course, he was.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
everyone has me on ignore :(


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 26, 2012 9:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 1:10 pm
Posts: 32114
pizza_Place: Milano's
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
spanky wrote:
You're late for church, JORR.


:lol: I might have to miss it today. I'm going to sit around at home trying to figure out how exactly this great legendary player who was always considered so much better than every All-Star was traded for Will Perdue.


Carmelo was traded for Felton and Gallinari, who have a combine zero (0) all star game appearances :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 286 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 40 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group