It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:10 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56483
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
pittmike wrote:
Do they own half the arena too?

AEG owns the arena, AEG owns the Kings and some of the Lakers. The Clippers are just a tenant, a tenant who lies around all day and smells bad.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 9:15 pm
Posts: 48806
Location: Bohemian Club Annual World Power Consolidation Conference & Golf Outing
pizza_Place: World Fluoridation Conspiracy Pizza & WINGS!
Just because somebody pays $2 billion for something doesn't mean it's automatically worth that. People overpay for things all the time. Assets have an intrinsic value separate from what 1 person may be willing to pay for it. That value in this case is probably somewhere between $750 mil - $1 billion.

It's worth an extra $1 billion to this guy for whatever his reasons may be - ego, whatever.

_________________
You know me like that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Just because somebody pays $2 billion for something doesn't mean it's automatically worth that. People overpay for things all the time. Assets have an intrinsic value separate from what 1 person may be willing to pay for it. That value in this case is probably somewhere between $750 mil - $1 billion.

It's worth an extra $1 billion to this guy for whatever his reasons may be - ego, whatever.

He's got way too much energy to play shuffleboard in his retirement


He might have more money than you


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56483
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
sinicalypse wrote:
you know deep down somewhere a bunch of these guys think along the same lines, just not in a recorded-for-public-consumption way


Oh, I'm sure our rich old Jewish guy who made his money gaming the system in real estate and throws lots of jobs and donations at minorities to show how racist he isn't would never think the way Donald Sterling thought.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
So he might lose 50%, but if he makes 5% that's a bad investment?
Yes! That is because he may lose 50%. You don't risk losing 50% if you expect to make 1.6% a year. It just doesn't work that way. You can buy cds with better returns on investment with no risk. A 1.6% yearly return on investment may not even beat inflation.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Like I said, if you know of automatic ways to make more than 5% you should be rich by now.
I know plenty with expected returns of investment of at least 5%. That doesn't mean it will do that every year. It will over a long enough time period.

According to this link: http://blog.petetheplanner.com/what-rate-of-return-should-you-expect-on-your-investments

The S&P averages 7.81% per year over the last 20 years. So buy a fund that invests in the S&P and expect 5% and then give me the other 2.81% for helping you.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Right. Invest in the S&P and just watch the profits roll in.

Sounds good.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:29 pm
Posts: 38889
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
sinicalypse wrote:
you know deep down somewhere a bunch of these guys think along the same lines, just not in a recorded-for-public-consumption way


Oh, I'm sure our rich old Jewish guy who made his money gaming the system in real estate and throws lots of jobs and donations at minorities to show how racist he isn't would never think the way Donald Sterling thought.

How dare you!! Jerry even had a black GM to show how even handed he is . Did Sterling?? Oh, wait a minute... :oops:

_________________
Proud member of the white guy grievance committee

It aint the six minutes. Its what happens in those six minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Invest in the S&P and just watch the profits roll in.

Sounds good.
There are better ways to do it but you will almost certainly do better than 2%. Also, as I said, if the economy were to tank that poorly, the Clippers would also be severely impacted so even that is a moot point.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Right. Invest in the S&P and just watch the profits roll in.

Sounds good.
There are better ways to do it but you will almost certainly do better than 2%. Also, as I said, if the economy were to tank that poorly, the Clippers would also be severely impacted so even that is a moot point.

High Risk Investments, Diversified Stock Funds

High risk investments like stock index funds are best understood by looking at a specific example.

An index is like a ruler. It measures the performance of a basket of stocks. One widely followed index is the Standard and Poor's 500 Index (S&P 500), which tracks the performance of five hundred of the largest publicly traded companies in America. These are companies like Proctor & Gamble, Microsoft, WalMart, Johnson & Johnson, GE, Pfizer and Exxon Mobil, just to name a few.

When you buy an S&P 500 Index fund, the fund owns a little bit of all five hundred stocks. If one of those companies gets in trouble, it has a minimal affect on your overall investment.

What about the odds of all five hundred of the largest companies in America going under, all at once? If that happens, we've got bigger problems on our hands than how to invest our money. For the sake of this discussion about risk, I'm comfortable saying you cannot lose all your money in a stock index fund. Yet you can experience times where your investment value will go down by 50%. For this reason, this type of investment is considered high risk, yet if you're in it for the long term, you've protected yourself from the risk of losing it all.



Rick if things happened the way your described the S&P would be trading at 40 Billion. I dont know what else to tell you here. You're just way off on a lot of your assumptions.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Rick if things happened the way your described the S&P would be trading at 40 Billion.
Can you explain this further?
rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know what else to tell you here. You're just way off on a lot of your assumptions.
What should be the expected rate of return on diversified stock market investment? Educate me.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 14, 2004 2:54 pm
Posts: 17128
Location: in the vents of life for joey belle
pizza_Place: how many planets have a chicago?
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Do they own half the arena too?

AEG owns the arena, AEG owns the Kings and some of the Lakers. The Clippers are just a tenant, a tenant who lies around all day and smells bad.


but hey, that's ok with donald sterling.... you know he's down with the lazy mexicans who lay around drinking beer all day because they're good salt of the earth people who are easy to get along with.

anyways, i'm going to resume not being a part of this thread because b-rick argument #438792614-D is going on and well, hey, at least in this age of participation trophies if there's nitpicking going on there's fundamentally gonna be "picking" involved, so that's good for the psyche. and you can't bemoan a point without moaning, and hey LOLSEX, so yeah, it's getting hot in here so take off all your clothes and remember that nelly used to be relevant in your life for about 5 minutes in 2002. feels good man.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
Les Grobstein's huge hog is proof that God has a sense of humor, isn't it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
rogers park bryan wrote:
Like I said, if you know of automatic ways to make more than 5% you should be rich by now.

Image

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40820
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Curious Hair wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Do they own half the arena too?

AEG owns the arena, AEG owns the Kings and some of the Lakers. The Clippers are just a tenant, a tenant who lies around all day and smells bad.



Thanks then I do not get the value amount. But as was said they are worth what some goof will pay.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
Rick if things happened the way your described the S&P would be trading at 40 Billion.
Can you explain this further?

Well, youre only looking at the upside. In your world it's apparently impossible for the S&P to go down.

rogers park bryan wrote:
I dont know what else to tell you here. You're just way off on a lot of your assumptions.
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
What should be the expected rate of return on diversified stock market investment? Educate me.

Im not sure what that has to do with buying the Clippers and selling them three years later for a 100 Million dollar profit.

If you look at average 5 year returns on the S&P it ranges as low -2.29% to 12% from 2002-2011

In those 5 years, you would have lost money about half the time depending on when you invested.


But like I said, there are probably better investments. None of them are even close to guaranteed as you present.

A 100 Million dollar profit is never a loss. Ever.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 30, 2006 1:42 pm
Posts: 29260
Location: Parts Unknown
pizza_Place: Frozen
Image

_________________
This is my signature...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kurtbadenha ... -clippers/


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
Well, youre only looking at the upside. In your world it's apparently impossible for the S&P to go down.
I am using the concept of expected return. Nothing is guaranteed. Of course the S&P could go down. It also could go up 25%. That is why you use the concept of expected return. Investments do lose money. That is why investing in something you expect to make a 1.6% return on is stupid.
rogers park bryan wrote:
Im not sure what that has to do with buying the Clippers and selling them three years later for a 100 Million dollar profit.
It's because that would be a poor return on investment.
rogers park bryan wrote:
A 100 Million dollar profit is never a loss. Ever.
It is not a literal loss but I didn't say it was. I said it was like you took a loss, because of how poor of a return that is.

A $1 profit over 500 years is a not a loss either unless you start to factor in other things that matter too.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 10:00 am 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Just because somebody pays $2 billion for something doesn't mean it's automatically worth that. People overpay for things all the time. Assets have an intrinsic value separate from what 1 person may be willing to pay for it. That value in this case is probably somewhere between $750 mil - $1 billion.

It's worth an extra $1 billion to this guy for whatever his reasons may be - ego, whatever.


I always thought something is only worth what someone is willing to pay.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
Given Ballmer's track record, wouldn't be surprised if he ends up selling the Clippers for under $1 billion:

Microsoft's mkt cap:

$601 billion (Ballmer takes over as CEO)
$270 billion (MS Board forces Ballmer to announce his resignation )
Change: -55%

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 93156
Location: To the left of my post
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Just because somebody pays $2 billion for something doesn't mean it's automatically worth that. People overpay for things all the time. Assets have an intrinsic value separate from what 1 person may be willing to pay for it. That value in this case is probably somewhere between $750 mil - $1 billion.

It's worth an extra $1 billion to this guy for whatever his reasons may be - ego, whatever.


I always thought something is only worth what someone is willing to pay.
Put Nas in the "impossible to overpay for anything" club!

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 1:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2010 3:40 pm
Posts: 16679
pizza_Place: Boni Vino
Hussra wrote:
Had to overpay to make the sale viable before the Sterlings kick-off--to make up for them forgoing the stepped-up basis their heirs would've rec'd on their death:

Hussra wrote:
Guessing if a sale happens before the wife dies now, the purchaser or the NBA/other owners will chip in an extra amount to cover the capital gains tax hit--similar to how when you look under your seat at Oprah and find the keys to a new car, Oprah kicks in some cash to cover the tax bill on the car.


viewtopic.php?f=100&t=87028#p1993433


I've seen this theory, but don't buy it. If you're selling a car, you can't tell prospective buyers that you need x amount extra over the car's true value just because you're having money troubles.

_________________
To IkeSouth, bigfan wrote:
Are you stoned or pissed off, or both, when you create these postings?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 2:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
I'm thinking it's more like Adam Silver/the NBA put the word out to prospective buyers that they needed to kick in the extra bucks to facilitate the sale now instead of post-death.

$660 mil is the estimate of total State/Fed capital gain taxes on the $2 bil sale price. So the Sterling's net $1.3 bil. Someone mentioned the other bids came in around/under $1.6 billion--which if the franchise was valued at best at $1 bil, the $1.4-1.6 bil sale price would've been the right amount to allow the Sterling trust to net what they would've if they held after death.

There's also talk of the Sterling's claiming a "forced sale" exemption to the capital gains tax. Their tax bill won't be due for a year. Wouldn't be surprised if they threaten to litigate and then offer/compromise with the IRS for less than the full amount of the tax due.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 2:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56483
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
Jaw Breaker wrote:
I've seen this theory, but don't buy it. If you're selling a car, you can't tell prospective buyers that you need x amount extra over the car's true value just because you're having money troubles.


Yeah, but is a cabal of billionaires begging you to sell your car?

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 3:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19533
I don't think the new owner gives a shit if it makes much money for him. Its viewed more as a toy.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 4:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2014 10:45 am
Posts: 16843
pizza_Place: Salerno's
http://youtu.be/pPPExso1x28
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 6:41 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Nas wrote:
Dr. Kenneth Noisewater wrote:
Just because somebody pays $2 billion for something doesn't mean it's automatically worth that. People overpay for things all the time. Assets have an intrinsic value separate from what 1 person may be willing to pay for it. That value in this case is probably somewhere between $750 mil - $1 billion.

It's worth an extra $1 billion to this guy for whatever his reasons may be - ego, whatever.


I always thought something is only worth what someone is willing to pay.
Put Nas in the "impossible to overpay for anything" club!


In many ways it is. The value of things is subjective. We have all spent more for things than someone else was willing to spend. To someone else we overpaid but we saw the value in spending a little more than someone else was willing to spend. It was worth more to us.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:35 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Q.Bovifs wrote:
I'm just glad fucking fatass Oprah has zero part in it.


She wasn't going to spend all of her money on a basketball team. Putting her name out there was nothing more than a reminder to the world that she is a billionaire.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Steve Ballmer era has begun. Should be interesting to see who can spend the most on horrible contracts -- Ballmer or the Russian Douche who owns the Nets.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 1:29 pm 
Offline
100000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 29, 2005 8:06 pm
Posts: 81466
pizza_Place: 773-684-2222
Now the NBA is suing Sterling.

_________________
Be well

GO BEARS!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Aug 12, 2014 6:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 11, 2006 1:05 am
Posts: 25181
Location: Cultural Mecca
pizza_Place: Pequod's / Barnaby's
Nas wrote:
Now the NBA is suing Sterling.

I don't even...

_________________
Rick Hahn is the best GM in baseball.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 96 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 43 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group