It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 5:06 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:

His contract is cap friendly so that's a plus. That may be a reason to keep him.

This statement alone means you need to stop questioning his value. He signed a max contract a year ago and you called it a cap friendly deal. That means he's very good and very valuable. Stop trying to manufacture an argument.


Another misrepresentation don't you think? The thread was started by someone else and everything that I provided in it is relative to the thread. That is until I started down this path.

You on the other hand, have accused me twice of being drunk. Misrepresenting. Trolling. Manufacturing. I tried to steer it back but at some point it's necessary to call you on it. I'm good now. I could go on for a little while longer, but I'm good.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Last edited by long time guy on Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:49 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:

His contract is cap friendly so that's a plus. That may be a reason to keep him.

This statement alone means you need to stop questioning his value. He signed a max contract a year ago and you called it a cap friendly deal. That means he's very good and very valuable. Stop trying to manufacture an argument.


Another misrepresentation don't you think? The thread was started by someone else and everything that I provided in it us relative to thread. Dont know exactly what it is that I'm misrepresenting.

You on the hand, have accused me twice of being drunk. Misrepresenting. Trolling. Manufacturing. I tried to steer it back but at some point it's necessary to call you on it. I'm good now. I could on for a little while longer, but I'm good.

I'll respond to this, but you're all over the place. I need some clarification. In the post you quoted, what opinion of yours did I misrepresent?

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I find it ludicrous that they're going to consider trading their top player to provide more comfort to a coach who has no idea what he's doing. "Hoiball" my ass. There's no such thing.

LTG can we please stop with the if then fallacies. According to your thinking if the Clippers turned down the Warriors' offer of Curry and Thompson for Paul, Jordan, Griffin, and two unprotected first rounders, you'd question whether or not Curry and Thompson had any value.


Once again a hypothetical I never created since it was a proposed trade. Another lie or misrepresentation by a "credible" poster. Did you bother to comment? Nope.


:lol: :lol: slow your roll, my friend. This particular post is a push back against the logic underlining some of your earlier posts. Obviously (or maybe not), the hypothetical is just that - a hypothetical, not a misrepresentation since you can only misrepresent things that have actually occurred.


You created the hypothetical that was a misrepresentation of what I actually believe. How is that for clarity my friend?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 6:29 pm
Posts: 56483
pizza_Place: Lou Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I don't want the attention when I post outlandishly.

_________________
Molly Lambert wrote:
The future holds the possibility to be great or terrible, and since it has not yet occurred it remains simultaneously both.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Curious Hair wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I don't want the attention when I post outlandishly.

:lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I find it ludicrous that they're going to consider trading their top player to provide more comfort to a coach who has no idea what he's doing. "Hoiball" my ass. There's no such thing.

LTG can we please stop with the if then fallacies. According to your thinking if the Clippers turned down the Warriors' offer of Curry and Thompson for Paul, Jordan, Griffin, and two unprotected first rounders, you'd question whether or not Curry and Thompson had any value.


Once again a hypothetical I never created since it was a proposed trade. Another lie or misrepresentation by a "credible" poster. Did you bother to comment? Nope.


:lol: :lol: slow your roll, my friend. This particular post is a push back against the logic underlining some of your earlier posts. Obviously (or maybe not), the hypothetical is just that - a hypothetical, not a misrepresentation since you can only misrepresent things that have actually occurred.


You created the hypothetical that was a misrepresentation of what I actually believe. How is that for clarity my friend?


Listen, I'll just rephrase that since this isn't going too well and I don't want to extend it: I don't think you make sound logical arguments some of the time. That's all. You can simply Google "informal fallacies" if you want to know more about where I'm coming from. Obviously you'll disagree and that's fine.

BTW, FF is not one to misrepresent what someone says.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
To be clear, long time guy, the drinking comments weren't meant as insults. It's just that your posts were making very little sense. I've posted many times while drinking. Pittmike and spanky's best work here usually comes after a cocktail or twelve. I wasn't implying you're an alcoholic or a degenerate.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 7:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I'm not a hockey guy, but from what I read of CH's posts, he just seems like a nervous fan... maybe even a bit superstitious to get too optimistic. When I'm really into a team, I'm the same way. It makes me clash with fans who are overly optimistic.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:

His contract is cap friendly so that's a plus. That may be a reason to keep him.

This statement alone means you need to stop questioning his value. He signed a max contract a year ago and you called it a cap friendly deal. That means he's very good and very valuable. Stop trying to manufacture an argument.


Another misrepresentation don't you think? The thread was started by someone else and everything that I provided in it us relative to thread. Dont know exactly what it is that I'm misrepresenting.

You on the hand, have accused me twice of being drunk. Misrepresenting. Trolling. Manufacturing. I tried to steer it back but at some point it's necessary to call you on it. I'm good now. I could on for a little while longer, but I'm good.

I'll respond to this, but you're all over the place. I need some clarification. In the post you quoted, what opinion of yours did I misrepresent?



When you suggest that I'm trying to manufacture an argument, that's a misrepresentation. I didn't start the argument. You did. I didn't start the thread either. I merely provided a comment. I didn't even suggest that I was in favor if trading Butler. I merely was surprised that Orlando would turn it down . What argument was I attempting to manufacture?

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
What argument was I attempting to manufacture?

The argument regarding how valuable Butler is or isn't. The thread was about a specific trade offer, and you turned it into an argument about the value of Butler. The reason I think it's manufactured is because Butler is making $18 million a year and you said it was a cap friendly contract. That means that you believe Butler is a very good player, one who is worth more than $18 million a year. If you believe Butler is that valuable, it makes no sense that you took the Magic's rejection of the offer as an insult to his value, instead of a high appraisal of Olidipo and the first round pick's value.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 30, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 22704
pizza_Place: A few...
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I'm not a hockey guy, but from what I read of CH's posts, he just seems like a nervous fan... maybe even a bit superstitious to get too optimistic. When I'm really into a team, I'm the same way. It makes me clash with fans who are overly optimistic.



I totally agree. It's like a nervous, superstitious Cubs fan x 20. Except the Hawks win Championships.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
What argument was I attempting to manufacture?

The argument regarding how valuable Butler is or isn't. The thread was about a specific trade offer, and you turned it into an argument about the value of Butler. The reason I think it's manufactured is because Butler is making $18 million a year and you said it was a cap friendly contract. That means that you believe Butler is a very good player, one who is worth more than $18 million a year. If you believe Butler is that valuable, it makes no sense that you took the Magic's rejection of the offer as an insult to his value, instead of a high appraisal of Olidipo and the first round pick's value.


Cap friendly relative to where guys will be paid in the future. His doesn't come up for 4 yrs. He is valued about right as it stands now. Guys are going to be overpaid in a few yrs and his contract will be cap friendly if his production remains where it is now. I hate to clarify this stuff all the time but assume that a knowledgeable guy such as yourself would be able to read through the lines.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Peoria Matt wrote:
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I'm not a hockey guy, but from what I read of CH's posts, he just seems like a nervous fan... maybe even a bit superstitious to get too optimistic. When I'm really into a team, I'm the same way. It makes me clash with fans who are overly optimistic.



I totally agree. It's like a nervous, superstitious Cubs fan x 20. Except the Hawks win Championships.


:lol: Being a Cubs fan makes it worse. Last year during the playoffs, I would move seats every inning they didn't score or stay if they did... all while knowing that it ultimately wouldn't work out our way, anyway.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
What argument was I attempting to manufacture?

The argument regarding how valuable Butler is or isn't. The thread was about a specific trade offer, and you turned it into an argument about the value of Butler. The reason I think it's manufactured is because Butler is making $18 million a year and you said it was a cap friendly contract. That means that you believe Butler is a very good player, one who is worth more than $18 million a year. If you believe Butler is that valuable, it makes no sense that you took the Magic's rejection of the offer as an insult to his value, instead of a high appraisal of Olidipo and the first round pick's value.


Cap friendly relative to where guys will be paid in the future. His doesn't come up for 4 yrs. He is valued about right as it stands now. Guys are going to be overpaid in a few yrs and his contract will be cap friendly if his production remains where it is now. I hate to clarify this stuff all the time but assume that a knowledgeable guy such as yourself would be able to read through the lines.

No reading through lines were necessary. The reasons for his contract being cap friendly are irrelevant(although I pretty much agree with you on why). He's on a current max contract that he just signed and we both agree it's cap friendly. The ONLY logical conclusion to that is that Butler is a very good and valuable player. There's really no other conclusion you can draw from it. Hence, any further argument regarding his value comes off as manufactured and you just disagreeing to be disagreeable.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
I have stated that the guy is valuable in this very thread. I actually have said that he is the only guy that has value in this very thread. Once again you are misrepresenting what I said. I also have never said that he isn't good player. That's a misrepresentation or lie to suggest that I have.

I stated that his value is the primary reason to trade him. So you are misrepresentating what I stated for the purpose of manufacturing an argument. I will bid adieu on this one and catch you up the road.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
leashyourkids wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Curious Hair wrote:
Nas posts outlandishly to draw negative attention, i.e., trolling.


If that makes Nas a troll then you are a huge troll as well.


I'm not a hockey guy, but from what I read of CH's posts, he just seems like a nervous fan... maybe even a bit superstitious to get too optimistic. When I'm really into a team, I'm the same way. It makes me clash with fans who are overly optimistic.

That's cool.

I do not consider CH a troll either. Just like I do not consider Nas a troll.

Now America...that is a troll. Rube...that is a troll.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
long time guy wrote:
I have stated that the guy is valuable in this very thread. I actually have said that he is the only guy that has value in this very thread. Once again you are misrepresenting what I said. I also have never said that he isn't good player. That's a misrepresentation or lie to suggest that I have.

I stated that his value is the primary reason to trade him. So you are misrepresentating what I stated for the purpose of manufacturing an argument. I will bid adieu on this one and catch you up the road.


FF might be referring to something like this for a manufactured argument:

long time guy wrote:
No one [said he is a franchise player*] but he is sort of being viewed as one apparently. He is the Bulls best player, but the best player on a team that is at best about a 45 win team is not untradeable. If the Bulls think the 3 guys improve the team then you do it. The Butler as best player model is flopping big time. How do we know that it may not be tied to him? I'm not necessarily saying it is because of him. He is a net positive, but Butler also seems to be overly concerned with his status as newly anointed best player. It is reflected in his quotes and his play.


*comment from Vegan

Youre arguing here against strawmen you created who say some of the following things:

1) Butler is untradeable
2) Butler as the best player on the team is a sustainable/worthwhile "model"
3) Butler isn't as valuable and/or good as the strawmen think because of the Bulls' poor play

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 7:00 pm
Posts: 40983
Location: Chicago
pizza_Place: Lou Malanati's
If Jerry says OK to an Amnesty on D Rose next year, then I sell out this year, but if not....have to wait till next year to clear the books.

_________________
"That's what the internet is for. Slandering others anonymously." Banky
“Been that way since one monkey looked at the sun and told the other monkey ‘He said for you to give me your fuckin’ share.’”


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:52 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
long time guy wrote:
I have stated that the guy is valuable in this very thread. I actually have said that he is the only guy that has value in this very thread. Once again you are misrepresenting what I said. I also have never said that he isn't good player. That's a misrepresentation or lie to suggest that I have.

I stated that his value is the primary reason to trade him. So you are misrepresentating what I stated for the purpose of manufacturing an argument. I will bid adieu on this one and catch you up the road.


FF might be referring to something like this for a manufactured argument:

long time guy wrote:
No one [said he is a franchise player*] but he is sort of being viewed as one apparently. He is the Bulls best player, but the best player on a team that is at best about a 45 win team is not untradeable. If the Bulls think the 3 guys improve the team then you do it. The Butler as best player model is flopping big time. How do we know that it may not be tied to him? I'm not necessarily saying it is because of him. He is a net positive, but Butler also seems to be overly concerned with his status as newly anointed best player. It is reflected in his quotes and his play.


*comment from Vegan

Youre arguing here against strawmen you created who say some of the following things:

1) Butler is untradeable
2) Butler as the best player on the team is a sustainable/worthwhile "model"
3) Butler isn't as valuable and/or good as the strawmen think because of the Bulls' poor play


I hate to break it too but that is sort of how the value of guys is assessed. Check the numerous arguments that I have had regarding Carmelo Anthony if you like.

You said that you didn't want to see him traded. That implies that you think he is untradeable. You may want to Google "valid inferences" while you are attempting to teach your logic course.

Merely providing an opinion is not looking for strawmen either.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
You said that you didn't want to see him traded. That implies that you think he is untradeable.

Nope. In no way does the first thought imply the second. This is why I sometimes ask you if you've been drinking.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
Yeah, I would have to strongly disagree that saying you don't want someone traded means they're untradeable.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You said that you didn't want to see him traded. That implies that you think he is untradeable.

Nope. In no way does the first thought imply the second. This is why I sometimes ask you if you've been drinking.



You sound stupid to be honest.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
long time guy wrote:
You said that you didn't want to see him traded. That implies that you think he is untradeable.

Nope. In no way does the first thought imply the second. This is why I sometimes ask you if you've been drinking.



You sound stupid to be honest.

Image

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 8:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
Saying you don't want someone traded does not mean you think they are untradeable.

I would say I do not "want" Butler traded. But he is clearly tradeable, and if the right deal comes along the Bulls should trade him.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
RFDC wrote:
Saying you don't want someone traded does not mean you think they are untradeable.

This is such an obvious point that only a troll would disagree. CH and Zippy, please take note. Thank you.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 9:10 am
Posts: 31948
veganfan21 wrote:
I find it ludicrous that they're going to consider trading their top player to provide more comfort to a coach who has no idea what he's doing. "Hoiball" my ass. There's no such thing.

LTG can we please stop with the if then fallacies. According to your thinking if the Clippers turned down the Warriors' offer of Curry and Thompson for Paul, Jordan, Griffin, and two unprotected first rounders, you'd question whether or not Curry and Thompson had any value.



In what part of the article does it suggest that they are trading Butler to provide more comfort for Hoiberg? Isn't this an example of making stuff up? Purveyor of all that is true what say you? Did you call him on it. Did you question credibility? Did you accuse him ofor misrepresenting or lying? His entire argument has either been to diss me or Hoiberg. This is why you have no credibility.

_________________
The Hawk wrote:
This is going to reach a head pretty soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Mar 20, 2013 3:50 pm
Posts: 16078
pizza_Place: Malnati's
RFDC wrote:
Saying you don't want someone traded does not mean you think they are untradeable.

I would say I do not "want" Butler traded. But he is clearly tradeable, and if the right deal comes along the Bulls should trade him.


leashyourkids wrote:
Yeah, I would have to strongly disagree that saying you don't want someone traded means they're untradeable.


FavreFan wrote:
Nope. In no way does the first thought imply the second. This is why I sometimes ask you if you've been drinking.


All ya'll need to stop ganging up on LTG and his valid inferences. And if you say you are not ganging up, that clearly implies you at least thought about ganging up on him.

_________________
Successful calls:

Kyrie Irving will never win anything as a team's alpha: check
T.rubisky is a bust: check
Ben Simmons is a liability: check
The Fields Cult is dumb: double check

2013 CSFMB ROY


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
long time guy wrote:
veganfan21 wrote:
I find it ludicrous that they're going to consider trading their top player to provide more comfort to a coach who has no idea what he's doing. "Hoiball" my ass. There's no such thing.

LTG can we please stop with the if then fallacies. According to your thinking if the Clippers turned down the Warriors' offer of Curry and Thompson for Paul, Jordan, Griffin, and two unprotected first rounders, you'd question whether or not Curry and Thompson had any value.



In what part of the article does it suggest that they are trading Butler to provide more comfort for Hoiberg? Isn't this an example of making stuff up? Purveyor of all that is true what say you? Did you call him on it. Did you question credibility? Did you accuse him ofor misrepresenting or lying? His entire argument has either been to diss me or Hoiberg. This is why you have no credibility.

I like that. I'm gonna put it on my business card. Thanks.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 14, 2016 9:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 14, 2011 7:56 am
Posts: 32234
Location: A sterile, homogeneous suburb
pizza_Place: Pizza Cucina
veganfan21 wrote:
RFDC wrote:
Saying you don't want someone traded does not mean you think they are untradeable.

I would say I do not "want" Butler traded. But he is clearly tradeable, and if the right deal comes along the Bulls should trade him.


leashyourkids wrote:
Yeah, I would have to strongly disagree that saying you don't want someone traded means they're untradeable.


FavreFan wrote:
Nope. In no way does the first thought imply the second. This is why I sometimes ask you if you've been drinking.


All ya'll need to stop ganging up on LTG and his valid inferences. And if you say you are not ganging up, that clearly implies you at least thought about ganging up on him.


LTG and I have no beef. I just disagree with his point. Don't drag me into your cult, vegan.

_________________
Curious Hair wrote:
I'm a big dumb shitlib baby


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 193 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 51 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group