| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=101413 |
Page 1 of 3 |
| Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:57 am ] |
| Post subject: | Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
What will be the ranking of each with respect to total wins. #1 Bulls #2 Knicks #3 Wolves. |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Wolves, Bulls, Knicks. I need to get me some Wolves gear. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
I think all three teams will likely finish within 5 games or so of eachother, but I'll go Wolves, Bulls, Knicks. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:00 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Knicks Wolves Bulls |
|
| Author: | ZephMarshack [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:02 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
ltg, if your prediction doesn't come true, are you going to pretend this thread doesn't exist, as with "Bulls 2015-2016 :The Narrative"? |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Three way tie at 25 wins. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:09 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
ZephMarshack wrote: ltg, if your prediction doesn't come true, are you going to pretend this thread doesn't exist, as with "Bulls 2015-2016 :The Narrative"? Damn you remembered that? Did that transfer over with the ownership change? I own up to losing the 55 win thing but no one made it much of an issue so I didn't either. I still think Hoi berg is a better coach than he gets credit for. I think injuries played a role but I also don't believe now that even if fully healthy they would be a 55 win team. More like 50 max. Gasol regressed and I overrated Snell and Mirotic. |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:16 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 11:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Douchebag wrote: Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup man, they're awful young. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:02 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Knicks Bulls Wolves |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:14 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup man, they're awful young. Awful Young > Just Awful |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Bulls will be good. Rondo's at the summer league getting the kids ready. |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
I think the Wolves will be the best of the 3 the 17-18 season. They need a year to learn how to win. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Douchebag wrote: City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup man, they're awful young. Awful Young > Just Awful Knicks have more talent than you think. We'll see. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Nas wrote: I think the Wolves will be the best of the 3 the 17-18 season. Way to go out on a limb. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
how is this seriously even a question? Bulls and Knicks are going to be awful while the Wolves are going to be great |
|
| Author: | redskingreg [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Bagels wrote: how is this seriously even a question? Bulls and Knicks are going to be awful while the Wolves are going to be great Wolves playing in the tougher conference certainly levels things out a bit. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
true, that is a valid point |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Bagels wrote: how is this seriously even a question? Bulls and Knicks are going to be awful while the Wolves are going to be great The Bulls are gonna be decent. Knicks could be good if Noah can give them 60+ games and Rose has a good contract year. Wolves are still unproven. It's a fair question. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Bulls or Knicks ended up with more wins. The conferences factor in too obviously. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 12:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup man, they're awful young. Awful Young > Just Awful Knicks have more talent than you think. We'll see. Yep. Porzingus I take over Wiggins and he isn't too far away from Towns. Melo can still play at All Star level. Rose and Noah are legit starters and Rose is capable of playing at a high level. They have to fill the 2 spot. Brandon Jennings is also a solid backup. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
FavreFan wrote: Bagels wrote: how is this seriously even a question? Bulls and Knicks are going to be awful while the Wolves are going to be great The Bulls are gonna be decent. Knicks could be good if Noah can give them 60+ games and Rose has a good contract year. Wolves are still unproven. It's a fair question. Wouldn't surprise me at all if the Bulls or Knicks ended up with more wins. The conferences factor in too obviously. Agree. The Wolves only won 29 games last season and essentially return the same team. There would have to be a significant jump made by their younger guys to get to 45 games. I think both the Knicks and Bulls will win more than 45 games. |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:22 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
long time guy wrote: City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: City of Fools wrote: Douchebag wrote: Bagels wrote: Wolves will win more than the Bulls & knicks combined Yup man, they're awful young. Awful Young > Just Awful Knicks have more talent than you think. We'll see. Yep. Porzingus I take over Wiggins and he isn't too far away from Towns. Melo can still play at All Star level. Rose and Noah are legit starters and Rose is capable of playing at a high level. They have to fill the 2 spot. Brandon Jennings is also a solid backup. well, I disagree with thought 1, thought 2, half of thought three, and maybe thought 5. But I still say Knicks, Bulls, Wolves. For this season. |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
long time guy wrote: Agree. The Wolves only won 29 games last season and essentially return the same team. There would have to be a significant jump made by their younger guys to get to 45 games. I think both the Knicks and Bulls will win more than 45 games. i think it's a reasonable expectation that Wiggins and Towns will continue to improve....and they've added a solid draft pick and some solid role players. In addition, several of the fringe teams either did not improve or got worse. Do you think Houston will still make the playoffs next year ? |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:29 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Bagels wrote: long time guy wrote: Agree. The Wolves only won 29 games last season and essentially return the same team. There would have to be a significant jump made by their younger guys to get to 45 games. I think both the Knicks and Bulls will win more than 45 games. i think it's a reasonable expectation that Wiggins and Towns will continue to improve....and they've added a solid draft pick and some solid role players. In addition, several of the fringe teams either did not improve or got worse. Do you think Houston will still make the playoffs next year ? No on Houston. Utah will replace Houston. Teams led by 2nd and 3rd yr players typically don't win unless they are all league. Towns be that but the jury is still out on Wiggins. I like Wiggins but it may be a little early to expect that out of him. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:30 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
The Pelicans fucked their future but they'll be in the playoffs probably this year. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Wolves Knicks Bulls Man I wish the Bulls had the Wolves roster + Thibs |
|
| Author: | Nas [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
I'm a huge Thibs fan but I just can't see him making a 20 game improvement for a team that doesn't know how to win. I think 41 wins is their ceiling. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Nas wrote: I'm a huge Thibs fan but I just can't see him making a 20 game improvement for a team that doesn't know how to win. I think 41 wins is their ceiling. I still think those 41 wins is enough to be better than the Bulls and NYK next year..... |
|
| Author: | Bagels [ Thu Jul 14, 2016 1:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Wolves. Bulls. Knicks. |
Nas wrote: I'm a huge Thibs fan but I just can't see him making a 20 game improvement for a team that doesn't know how to win. I think 41 wins is their ceiling. ill take the over |
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|