Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=106974
Page 1 of 1

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:35 am ]
Post subject:  Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

This narrative feels familiar

Image

Author:  Nas [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:36 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Why won't they go to the White House?

Author:  Kirkwood [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

Author:  Terry's Peeps [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:48 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Nas wrote:
Why won't they go to the White House?


Bad hombres over there.

SAD!

Author:  billypootons [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:56 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

FavreFan wrote:
This narrative feels familiar

Image


if jordan was white, is that picture then racist?

Author:  ZephMarshack [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:59 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Kirkwood wrote:
The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

This is the key context that gets lost in the "The NBA always had superteams" excuse. I'll happily concede the Bulls and Lakers and whoever else was dominant but those teams were dominant in an era where 3/4 of the league was attempting to tank.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Kirkwood wrote:
The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

One fluke postseason that was the result of a goon jumping on Kawhi's foot when he was in the middle of destroying Durant and this "superteam"

Author:  long time guy [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 12:53 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

ZephMarshack wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

This is the key context that gets lost in the "The NBA always had superteams" excuse. I'll happily concede the Bulls and Lakers and whoever else was dominant but those teams were dominant in an era where 3/4 of the league was attempting to tank.

Author:  Brick [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Something is lost with how these teams are put together though. It's probably the ultimate conclusion to free agency and the power given to the players to take the easy route but it still just comes off as different than in the past. You wanted to see Cleveland and OKC go on the journey of becoming a championship team. You didn't want the star player to just join up with other star players and coast to a title though in the case of the Heat they had two embarrassing failures.

I was a huge Lebron fan as soon as I learned about him in high school. The Heat thing really bothered me because I felt like the story would always be tainted. I was back in when he went back to Cleveland and enjoyed last year immensely. I also was a big Durant fan from college and then the pros. I hated that one even more. I can't even feel happy for him even as he showed just how great he is by playing at an elite level.

I guess it is just the new normal way that the NBA will be. I don't really see how you can be excited for next year as a Bulls fan. You just have to hope the Bulls somehow become the next super team but that likely seems to be the Lakers or Celtics.

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:04 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Something is lost with how these teams are put together though. It's probably the ultimate conclusion to free agency and the power given to the players to take the easy route but it still just comes off as different than in the past. You wanted to see Cleveland and OKC go on the journey of becoming a championship team. You didn't want the star player to just join up with other star players and coast to a title though in the case of the Heat they had two embarrassing failures.

I was a huge Lebron fan as soon as I learned about him in high school. The Heat thing really bothered me because I felt like the story would always be tainted. I was back in when he went back to Cleveland and enjoyed last year immensely. I also was a big Durant fan from college and then the pros. I hated that one even more. I can't even feel happy for him even as he showed just how great he is by playing at an elite level.

I guess it is just the new normal way that the NBA will be. I don't really see how you can be excited for next year as a Bulls fan. You just have to hope the Bulls somehow become the next super team but that likely seems to be the Lakers or Celtics.

A healthy Kawhi will render all this discussion moot next June

Author:  Bagels [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:05 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

FavreFan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

One fluke postseason that was the result of a goon jumping on Kawhi's foot when he was in the middle of destroying Durant and this "superteam"


gonna keep beating that drum all the way until next postseason huh

Author:  FavreFan [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:09 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

Bagels wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Kirkwood wrote:
The Bulls playoff series' were competitive.

One fluke postseason that was the result of a goon jumping on Kawhi's foot when he was in the middle of destroying Durant and this "superteam"


gonna keep beating that drum all the way until next postseason huh

Yeah, I think so

Author:  Brick [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Something is lost with how these teams are put together though. It's probably the ultimate conclusion to free agency and the power given to the players to take the easy route but it still just comes off as different than in the past. You wanted to see Cleveland and OKC go on the journey of becoming a championship team. You didn't want the star player to just join up with other star players and coast to a title though in the case of the Heat they had two embarrassing failures.

I was a huge Lebron fan as soon as I learned about him in high school. The Heat thing really bothered me because I felt like the story would always be tainted. I was back in when he went back to Cleveland and enjoyed last year immensely. I also was a big Durant fan from college and then the pros. I hated that one even more. I can't even feel happy for him even as he showed just how great he is by playing at an elite level.

I guess it is just the new normal way that the NBA will be. I don't really see how you can be excited for next year as a Bulls fan. You just have to hope the Bulls somehow become the next super team but that likely seems to be the Lakers or Celtics.

A healthy Kawhi will render all this discussion moot next June
Not for the Bulls. :lol:

Author:  KDdidit [ Tue Jun 13, 2017 1:12 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Are the Warriors so good they're bad for the NBA?

You know who was so bad, they knew they were good?

Bearsssssss

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/