Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Jimmy Butler https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=107115 |
Page 1 of 2 |
Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Jimmy Butler |
Gonna finish in the top 5 MVP voting next season |
Author: | Nas [ Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:25 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
FavreFan wrote: Gonna finish in the top 5 MVP voting next season No chance in he'll. Wager? |
Author: | IkeSouth [ Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:33 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
He went to a small market team |
Author: | 312player [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:27 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. |
Author: | veganfan21 [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 8:33 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
FavreFan wrote: Gonna finish in the top 5 MVP voting next season Nope Westbrook Durant Curry LBJ Harden Leonard |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:28 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
312player wrote: Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. Gar could have gotten the 1st pick and the another pick without giving up their own pick. |
Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Nas wrote: 312player wrote: Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. Gar could have gotten the 1st pick and the another pick without giving up their own pick. How do you figure that? |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:53 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: 312player wrote: Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. Gar could have gotten the 1st pick and the another pick without giving up their own pick. How do you figure that? Boston was going to give the Bulls 2 picks at the deadline. One of those picks would have been the #1 pick. The Bulls wanted their players instead. |
Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 9:56 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Nas wrote: RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: 312player wrote: Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. Gar could have gotten the 1st pick and the another pick without giving up their own pick. How do you figure that? Boston was going to give the Bulls 2 picks at the deadline. One of those picks would have been the #1 pick. The Bulls wanted their players instead. I dont think there is any real certainty with that. |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: 312player wrote: Pax fucked up again, could have gotten more for him 5 months ago. This draft had 5 guys who are going to be great and Ball ain't one of em, so those too 6- 8 picks were very valuable this year. A team would have ponied up more if they had Jimmy for the playoff run this year. Pax got fleeced. Gar could have gotten the 1st pick and the another pick without giving up their own pick. How do you figure that? Boston was going to give the Bulls 2 picks at the deadline. One of those picks would have been the #1 pick. The Bulls wanted their players instead. I dont think there is any real certainty with that. It was reported by MANY. The Celtics offered picks and Gar wanted players. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 11:59 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
veganfan21 wrote: FavreFan wrote: Gonna finish in the top 5 MVP voting next season Nope Westbrook Durant Curry LBJ Harden Leonard He's gonna finish ahead of all those guys except for Kawhi. I'm not saying he's gonna be a top 5 player next year. It'll be like when Noah came 4th. It's just gonna be one of the stories of next year I think. |
Author: | IMU [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:40 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Butler is going to score 30+ PPG in the West. |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:43 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
IMU wrote: Butler is going to score 30+ PPG in the West. No chance. He'll average around 20 and play great defense because he doesn't have to score all of the points. If they can grab a player in free agency and stop trying to dump Rubio the Wolves should be a top 4 team in the West. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:45 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
I got Jimmy at 24 PPG, 7 RPG, 5.5 APG, 27 PER next season. I see no reason why his yearly improvement won't continue. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:51 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick.
|
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
FavreFan wrote: I got Jimmy at 24 PPG, 7 RPG, 5.5 APG, 27 PER next season. I see no reason why his yearly improvement won't continue. Because the Wolves have players that can score. He doesn't need to carry the load. He can save himself until it matters. |
Author: | Bagels [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 2:59 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young
|
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:05 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Bagels wrote: FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young This alone should get Gar Forman fired. I'm reading Uncle Jerry's son was behind it too. |
Author: | Bagels [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Crowder's certainly a solid player, but what the hell good was he going to do the Bulls in a rebuilding phase ? He's more of a complimentary player on a contender, definitely not a building block |
Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:09 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Nas wrote: Bagels wrote: FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young This alone should get Gar Forman fired. I'm reading Uncle Jerry's son was behind it too. Why just Gar? Pax is knee deep in this shit as well |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Bagels wrote: Crowder's certainly a solid player, but what the hell good was he going to do the Bulls in a rebuilding phase ? He's more of a complimentary player on a contender, definitely not a building block Agreed. Definitely not a player you build around. TAKE THE PICKS! |
Author: | Nas [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:10 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: Bagels wrote: FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young This alone should get Gar Forman fired. I'm reading Uncle Jerry's son was behind it too. Why just Gar? Pax is knee deep in this shit as well Paxson was pushing for a rebuild since last summer. |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:12 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Nas wrote: RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: Bagels wrote: FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young This alone should get Gar Forman fired. I'm reading Uncle Jerry's son was behind it too. Why just Gar? Pax is knee deep in this shit as well Paxson was pushing for a rebuild since last summer. I don't think I believe that. Isn't he technically Gar's boss? |
Author: | Bagels [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
what exactly does Paxson do ? |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Bagels wrote: what exactly does Paxson do ? Signs off on horrendous trades and draft picks and hides from the media. Not sure what other responsibilities he has. |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Nas wrote: RFDC wrote: Nas wrote: Bagels wrote: FavreFan wrote: Zach Lowe is the best basketball writer in the country. Here is his take on the trade: http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/page/pr ... -bulls-nba Key excerpt: Quote: This was Minnesota's last summer to really play around with its core, on its terms. The Wolves aimed big, flipping LaVine, Kris Dunn and the No. 7 pick to the aimless Bulls for Jimmy Butler -- a top-10 player in the league last season, smack in the middle of his absolute prime -- and a draft pick. here's another excerpt for ltg, who keeps falsely claiming this was the best they could have got Quote: They might have been able to get more at last February's trade deadline had they gone all-in on rebuilding then. Boston was willing to offer a healthy package centered around expiring contracts and future picks -- including the 2017 Nets pick, perhaps with top-1 protection -- if they could retain most of their present-day core, sources told ESPN.com (and others) at the time. Instead, the two sides haggled over Crowder, sources have told ESPN.com. Chicago wanted him, along with picks. Boston wanted to keep him, pair him with Butler, and make an honest run at LeBron James. The deal died, and now Chicago wants to go young This alone should get Gar Forman fired. I'm reading Uncle Jerry's son was behind it too. Why just Gar? Pax is knee deep in this shit as well Paxson was pushing for a rebuild since last summer. That's a crock of shit...why get Wade and Rondo????? |
Author: | ZephMarshack [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:49 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
FavreFan wrote: Bagels wrote: what exactly does Paxson do ? Signs off on horrendous trades and draft picks and hides from the media. Not sure what other responsibilities he has. He also announces yearly that he'll be taking a more active role in the Bulls decision making in the future. That way if they're successful he can take the credit and if they're not, he can say he'll be taking a more active role in the Bulls decision making in the future (so any disappointment is really Gar's fault). |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:54 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
https://twitter.com/ChiSportUpdates/status/878312604090810368 |
Author: | FavreFan [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 3:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: He continues to prove leash wrong about him. Bravo, Jimmy |
Author: | RFDC [ Fri Jun 23, 2017 4:29 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Jimmy Butler |
Bagels wrote: what exactly does Paxson do ? no kidding. if paxson wanted a rebuild before then they should be doing it then. If Pax let Gar talk him into waiting then that is even more reason why Pax should be gone now as well. |
Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |