Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| De' Aaron Fox - Sac Kings https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=110709 |
Page 1 of 5 |
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:06 pm ] |
| Post subject: | De' Aaron Fox - Sac Kings |
If that bum Lonzo Ball has a thread then Fox has to have one. Check out this rising star @ 6:30 tonight against the Bulls. he's 3x the player that scrub Lonzo is. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Fox sucks |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 3:59 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Fox is currently ranked 23rd in PER for all rookies http://insider.espn.com/nba/hollinger/s ... on/rookies Sandwiched right between Luke Kennard and Josh Hart. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Kudos to 312 for taking the fight to the NBA message board establishment. Not enough love for De'Aaron Fox. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
long time guy wrote: Kudos to 312 for taking the fight to the NBA message board establishment. Not enough love for De'Aaron Fox. I'm not sure what Fox does "well" ? |
|
| Author: | City of Fools [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:34 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
have any of you watched his games? I've seen 6. Dude can play, his "supporting cast" is beyond terrible. I still like him a lot. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:36 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Caller Bob wrote: long time guy wrote: Kudos to 312 for taking the fight to the NBA message board establishment. Not enough love for De'Aaron Fox. I'm not sure what Fox does "well" ? Nobody is. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:38 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
City of Fools wrote: have any of you watched his games? I've seen 6. Dude can play, his "supporting cast" is beyond terrible. I still like him a lot. May I hazard a guess that for many rookies, especially lottery picks, they all have a terrible "supporting cast". |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 4:53 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
City of Fools wrote: have any of you watched his games? I've seen 6. Dude can play, his "supporting cast" is beyond terrible. I still like him a lot. He’s fast. Not sure what other positive attributes he has yet. We’ll see. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Caller Bob wrote: Fox is currently ranked 23rd in PER for all rookies http://insider.espn.com/nba/hollinger/s ... on/rookies Sandwiched right between Luke Kennard and Josh Hart. Watch him 2nite, leave the number crunching for the nerds..He's very good and going to be great..his roster is the worst in the league. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Caller Bob wrote: Fox is currently ranked 23rd in PER for all rookies http://insider.espn.com/nba/hollinger/s ... on/rookies Sandwiched right between Luke Kennard and Josh Hart. Watch him 2nite, leave the number crunching for the nerds..He's very good and going to be great..his roster is the worst in the league. |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 5:31 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
312player wrote: Caller Bob wrote: Fox is currently ranked 23rd in PER for all rookies http://insider.espn.com/nba/hollinger/s ... on/rookies Sandwiched right between Luke Kennard and Josh Hart. Watch him 2nite, leave the number crunching for the nerds..He's very good and going to be great..his roster is the worst in the league. Shame you don't extend that same variable in your Watson/Mahomes > Trubiski argument. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 9:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Caller Bob wrote: 312player wrote: Caller Bob wrote: Fox is currently ranked 23rd in PER for all rookies http://insider.espn.com/nba/hollinger/s ... on/rookies Sandwiched right between Luke Kennard and Josh Hart. Watch him 2nite, leave the number crunching for the nerds..He's very good and going to be great..his roster is the worst in the league. Shame you don't extend that same variable in your Watson/Mahomes > Trubiski argument. Apples-oranges |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:23 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
| Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
FavreFan wrote: :lol: Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. It's possibly the worst roster ever assembled. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:46 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: :lol: Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. It's possibly the worst roster ever assembled. Is this supposed to be an argument in favor of Fox being good? |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:47 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Also that statement is ridiculous. The Juwan Howard Nuggets and that one Bobcats team with nobody were clearly worse. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:48 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: :lol: Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. It's possibly the worst roster ever assembled. Is this supposed to be an argument in favor of Fox being good? I never remember you complaining whenever it was used to promote the greatness of Lonzo Ball. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:49 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
long time guy wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: :lol: Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. It's possibly the worst roster ever assembled. Is this supposed to be an argument in favor of Fox being good? I never remember you complaining whenever it was used to promote the greatness of Lonzo Ball. Nobody ever called a team with Lonzo on it the worst team ever assembled. Certainly nobody who liked Ball said that. Read this entire exchange again and see if you can spot the glaring inconsistency. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:54 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
The Lakers play better minus Ball. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
FavreFan wrote: long time guy wrote: FavreFan wrote: 312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: :lol: Kings get their first bucket with 6 minutes left in the first quarter. Fox sucks. It's possibly the worst roster ever assembled. Is this supposed to be an argument in favor of Fox being good? I never remember you complaining whenever it was used to promote the greatness of Lonzo Ball. Nobody ever called a team with Lonzo on it the worst team ever assembled. Certainly nobody who liked Ball said that. Read this entire exchange again and see if you can spot the glaring inconsistency. Hyperbolic yes but the "terrible" team argument was used repeatedly whenever he had a bad performance. Every player on the roster save for Kuzma was bashed repeatedly in an effort to excuse bad play. You never refuted it either. |
|
| Author: | long time guy [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 10:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
312player wrote: The Lakers play better minus Ball. 6-2 without him over the past 8 games. Some of the earlier losses without him were due to missing other members of the starting lineup. Ingram, KCP, and Lopez were also missing from some of those games but the only person that was ever noted was Ball. |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Mon Feb 05, 2018 11:09 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
long time guy wrote: 312player wrote: The Lakers play better minus Ball. 6-2 without him over the past 8 games. Some of the earlier losses without him were due to missing other members of the starting lineup. Ingram, KCP, and Lopez were also missing from some of those games but the only person that was ever noted was Ball. Yup |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 9:39 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Fox crushed it last night. 5 points |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:26 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Cmon...what he play? 12 minutes? |
|
| Author: | Caller Bob [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 11:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
17 minutes. If he can't crack more minutes than that, on a bum ass roster, he probably sucks. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 12:55 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
Caller Bob wrote: 17 minutes. If he can't crack more minutes than that, on a bum ass roster, he probably sucks. Right. How is that a valid excuse? |
|
| Author: | 312player [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 1:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
FavreFan wrote: Caller Bob wrote: 17 minutes. If he can't crack more minutes than that, on a bum ass roster, he probably sucks. Right. How is that a valid excuse? The kings needed that loss, they played him short minutes to lose. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 1:07 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Caller Bob wrote: 17 minutes. If he can't crack more minutes than that, on a bum ass roster, he probably sucks. Right. How is that a valid excuse? The kings needed that loss, they played him short minutes to lose.
|
|
| Author: | RFDC [ Tue Feb 06, 2018 1:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: De' Aaron Fox |
312player wrote: FavreFan wrote: Caller Bob wrote: 17 minutes. If he can't crack more minutes than that, on a bum ass roster, he probably sucks. Right. How is that a valid excuse? The kings needed that loss, they played him short minutes to lose. terrible thought
|
|
| Page 1 of 5 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|