Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=112864 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
Interesting article. https://hoopshype.com/2018/06/14/nba-dr ... t-classes/ Top 3 classes according to the article. 1. 1984 2. 1996 3. 2003. This one goes back a little further and flip flops the top 2 spots https://uproxx.com/dimemag/10-best-nba- ... sses-ever/ |
Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 5:57 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
you mocked me for linking to hoops hype viewtopic.php?f=91&t=111945&p=2961883&hilit=Hoopshype#p2961883 |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:07 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
FavreFan wrote: Is that the only thing you have to add? Another sourcegate discredit? I can find any number of sources that will say the same thing. The top 3 probably won't change so it doesn't matter what the source happens to be. |
Author: | America [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:08 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
ltg: attack, counterattack, never apologize |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
America wrote: ltg: attack, counterattack, never apologize The source attack game is one of the weaker arguments on here. I've been guilty of it at times but it is essentially a tool used to evade making or addressing a point. |
Author: | America [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
I think FF is just trying to catch you in a gotcha moment for fun. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
long time guy wrote: FavreFan wrote: Is that the only thing you have to add? Another sourcegate discredit? I can find any number of sources that will say the same thing. The top 3 probably won't change so it doesn't matter what the source happens to be. See. Only the order will change. https://nypost.com/2016/06/23/the-top-1 ... -all-time/ |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
America wrote: I think FF is just trying to catch you in a gotcha moment for fun. Yeah but he is wasting his time. Not interested. |
Author: | long time gay [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:14 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
And let's not forget the inharent racism some of you display your that makes it different. You are all of course the proverbial childs play that stirs up the damn fools on here. It is a shame there is no true unbiased people here to call foul on all this nonsense. But if the shoe fits wear it is my motto. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 6:36 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
long time gay wrote: And let's not forget the inharent racism some of you display your that makes it different. You are all of course the proverbial childs play that stirs up the damn fools on here. It is a shame there is no true unbiased people here to call foul on all this nonsense. But if the shoe fits wear it is my motto. Your mult game is slipping. Carry on however. I like the fact that some continue to fall for it. |
Author: | Walt Williams Neck [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 7:37 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
2009 pretty good |
Author: | 312player [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:31 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
Walt Williams Neck wrote: 2009 pretty good Yeah, Taj and Patrick Beverley were in there too. |
Author: | 312player [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 8:34 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
long time guy wrote: long time gay wrote: And let's not forget the inharent racism some of you display your that makes it different. You are all of course the proverbial childs play that stirs up the damn fools on here. It is a shame there is no true unbiased people here to call foul on all this nonsense. But if the shoe fits wear it is my motto. Your mult game is slipping. Carry on however. I like the fact that some continue to fall for it. Who ya think it is? Curious hair Rick Lyk FF Drken It's one of those |
Author: | long time gay [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 9:42 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
312player wrote: long time guy wrote: long time gay wrote: And let's not forget the inharent racism some of you display your that makes it different. You are all of course the proverbial childs play that stirs up the damn fools on here. It is a shame there is no true unbiased people here to call foul on all this nonsense. But if the shoe fits wear it is my motto. Your mult game is slipping. Carry on however. I like the fact that some continue to fall for it. Who ya think it is? Curious hair Rick Lyk FF Drken It's one of those Revisionist history. None of these so called message board police can do what the proverbial message board wardens would like to do. Frankly its a damn shame and you are a damn liar. You may think you speak for everyone but the NBA ratings say different. I am not going anywhere. I have a masters in this shit. |
Author: | long time guy [ Thu Jun 14, 2018 11:23 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Top 10 draft classes over the past 40 years |
312player wrote: long time guy wrote: long time gay wrote: And let's not forget the inharent racism some of you display your that makes it different. You are all of course the proverbial childs play that stirs up the damn fools on here. It is a shame there is no true unbiased people here to call foul on all this nonsense. But if the shoe fits wear it is my motto. Your mult game is slipping. Carry on however. I like the fact that some continue to fall for it. Who ya think it is? Curious hair Rick Lyk FF Drken It's one of those Curious Hair or Leash. No doubt about it. He has got to get some material. Too repetitive at this point. 1. Revisionist history 2. Proverbial 3. Master's 4. Police. Probably leash. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |