Chicago Fanatics Message Board
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Mo Cheeks
https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=27387
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Walt Williams Neck [ Sat Dec 13, 2008 2:23 pm ]
Post subject:  Mo Cheeks

76ers fire Mo best remembered for helping the girl siing the star spangled banner!

Author:  suckers playground [ Sat Dec 13, 2008 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

Can't believe that. Mo is the least of that team's problems.

Author:  Colonel Angus [ Sat Dec 13, 2008 4:42 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

It would be amusing if they replaced Mo with a guy named Les.

Author:  donspiracy [ Sat Dec 13, 2008 7:15 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

This gets the Sixers closer to a championship...

The GM should have fired himself first. Elton Brand was sweaty putting his warmups on. How can you be 6'10" and play below the rim?

Besides being hurt and bad.

Author:  SHARK [ Sat Dec 13, 2008 10:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

donspiracy wrote:
This gets the Sixers closer to a championship...

The GM should have fired himself first. Elton Brand was sweaty putting his warmups on. How can you be 6'10" and play below the rim?

Besides being hurt and bad.

I wonder if the 76ers were saddled by the kind of high expectations that the Bulls had last season...Many thought the Sixers were the 4th best team in the Eastern Conference by many NBA "experts" before this season, while the same "experts" thought the Bulls were going to make the next step before Scott Skiles & assistant Jim Boylan lost their jobs as Chicago won only 33 games a season ago...

Author:  Regular Reader [ Sun Dec 14, 2008 12:26 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

Walt Williams Neck wrote:
76ers fire Mo best remembered for helping the girl siing the star spangled banner!


Sorry, he'll always be the PG on the "Fo, fo, fo" team, at least around these precincts.

Author:  W_Z [ Sun Dec 14, 2008 7:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

cheeks should've been fired a few years ago, but this move doesn't really make a lot of sense now. it's not like an interim coach is going to do anything to help.

once again, they'll be under .500 and either miss the playoffs or be that last seed again. "the new" AI is not growing like i hoped.

Author:  The Original Kid Cairo [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:31 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

The Sixers said, "We don't want no mo Cheeks."

Bad joke, I know. :oops:

Author:  Hawkeye Vince [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:09 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

W_Z wrote:
once again, they'll be under .500 and either miss the playoffs or be that last seed again. "the new" AI is not growing like i hoped.


Iggy has regressed a bit. I haven't watched enough of the Sixers to analyze it but I'm sure having a legit post threat in Brand is helping his assist numbers, but his shooting pcts are way down year to year and it shows in his points per game.

Author:  Bagels [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 9:50 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

Hawkeye Vince wrote:
W_Z wrote:
once again, they'll be under .500 and either miss the playoffs or be that last seed again. "the new" AI is not growing like i hoped.


Iggy has regressed a bit. I haven't watched enough of the Sixers to analyze it but I'm sure having a legit post threat in Brand is helping his assist numbers, but his shooting pcts are way down year to year and it shows in his points per game.


Also Dalembert has been a huge disappointment

Author:  W_Z [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 10:17 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

Bagels wrote:
Also Dalembert has been a huge disappointment


he'll still be "developing" at age 50. someone tell him you can only have 6 fouls per game, but as many rebounds as you want.

Author:  City of Fools [ Mon Dec 15, 2008 11:39 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Mo Cheeks

donspiracy wrote:
This gets the Sixers closer to a championship...

The GM should have fired himself first. Elton Brand was sweaty putting his warmups on. How can you be 6'10" and play below the rim?

Besides being hurt and bad.

well, first off he's only 6-8, which does impact him being below the rim...but yeah, it was a mistake to take a running team and add Brand. He gives you 20/10, but if you need him to give that to you, you're a bad team. This has been proven time and time again. Anyone else still want him?

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/