Brooklyn Brawlers.
With this as uniforms.
| Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/ |
|
| Brooklyn Nets https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=62611 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
If we got used to the Utah Jazz, I can get used to this name I suppose. At last we dont have to see the Oklahoma City Sonics. |
|
| Author: | HOVA [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:21 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Y’all don’t know that don’t shit phase me The Nets could go 0-82 and I look at you like this shit gravy |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Why would they change the name? It was named the Nets because of the Jets and Mets who were from the same area. It would be like the Lakers going back to Minneapolis and then changing the name. |
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:25 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
HOVA wrote: Y’all don’t know that don’t shit phase me The Clips could go 0-82 and I look at you like this shit gravy I could imagine Donald Sterling saying this. If he knew how to rap. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:28 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Brooklyn Ballers |
|
| Author: | Brick [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:31 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
immessedup17 wrote: It isn't the "Nets" I take issue with..."Brooklyn Nets" just don't go too well together, in my opinion. Ok. That's fair. I think they just wanted to make it clear that they aren't associated with Queens.
|
|
| Author: | Krazy Ivan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:33 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Brooklyn Darons |
|
| Author: | Terry's Peeps [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 10:36 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Brooklyn Brawlers. With this as uniforms.
|
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 11:01 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
|
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 12:58 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
You could call that team the Brooklyn Deckers after the supermodel turned actress...OR NOT! Then again, there's nothing pretty about the Nets' franchise on the whole, whether they were known as the New York Nets in the old ABA, the New Jersey Nets or where they called home for the longest time in the Meadowlands. |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
SHARK wrote: You could call that team the Brooklyn Deckers after the supermodel turned actress...OR NOT! Then again, there's nothing pretty about the Nets' franchise on the whole, whether they were known as the New York Nets in the old ABA, the New Jersey Nets or where they called home for the longest time in the Meadowlands. Russian Owner right? How bout the New Jersey Nyets? Ill show myself out... |
|
| Author: | Douchebag [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
rogers park bryan wrote: SHARK wrote: You could call that team the Brooklyn Deckers after the supermodel turned actress...OR NOT! Then again, there's nothing pretty about the Nets' franchise on the whole, whether they were known as the New York Nets in the old ABA, the New Jersey Nets or where they called home for the longest time in the Meadowlands. Russian Owner right? How bout the New Jersey Nyets? Ill show myself out... 
|
|
| Author: | Drop In [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:01 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
They've got 99 problems and a name is one. Hey hey. |
|
| Author: | SHARK [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:03 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
rogers park bryan wrote: SHARK wrote: You could call that team the Brooklyn Deckers after the supermodel turned actress...OR NOT! Then again, there's nothing pretty about the Nets' franchise on the whole, whether they were known as the New York Nets in the old ABA, the New Jersey Nets or where they called home for the longest time in the Meadowlands. Russian Owner right? How bout the New Jersey Nyets? Ill show myself out... Actually, RP, I saw that story last year on CBS News' "60 Minutes" and I wouldn't mind partying with that dude who owns the Nets... |
|
| Author: | rogers park bryan [ Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
SHARK wrote: I wouldn't mind partying with that dude who owns the Nets... Signature |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:35 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
immessedup17 wrote: Keeping Score wrote: Can somebody explain to me the Kris Humphries situation? Is he still a free agent? And if so, why? I thought he put together a nice little season for himself last year. Collusion. Teams know it'll be a distraction - he will have TMZ and the like wanting interviews and crap for at least a few more months I imagine. I mean, he has already made several talk show rounds...maybe he likes this stuff more than basketball. It's not collusion when teams independently decide that a journeyman NBA player isnt worth the headache of tabloid headlines and Kardashians. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:46 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
immessedup17 wrote: Correct, if they independently decided that. If David Stern decided it, it is different. He had a very solid year, I find it hard to believe that at least one team didn't want to grab him...especially since so many teams are weak when it comes to big guys. I love me a good NBA conspiracy theory but I don't know if this passes the smell test. Someone will probably give him a flyer. How come there's been no Sam Dalembert signing? I always thought he was at least a servicable big. |
|
| Author: | Phil McCracken [ Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:59 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Keeping Score wrote: Phil McCracken wrote: immessedup17 wrote: Correct, if they independently decided that. If David Stern decided it, it is different. He had a very solid year, I find it hard to believe that at least one team didn't want to grab him...especially since so many teams are weak when it comes to big guys. I love me a good NBA conspiracy theory but I don't know if this passes the smell test. Someone will probably give him a flyer. How come there's been no Sam Dalembert signing? I always thought he was at least a servicable big. Sort of surprised nobody took a shot at Arenas yet. NYK....or if you want a dark horse why don't the Lakers bring him back home to LA? They are one head case short since trading Lamar and they definately need scoring beyond Kobe |
|
| Author: | Ugueth Will Shiv You [ Tue Dec 20, 2011 12:04 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Keeping Score wrote: Sort of surprised nobody took a shot at Arenas yet. Oh, I'm sure many people have. 
|
|
| Author: | FavreFan [ Thu Dec 22, 2011 8:18 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Brooklyn Nets |
Keeping Score wrote: Quote: @ESPNSteinLineMarc Stein In another stealth Nets/Jazz trade, New Jersey announces it has just acquired Mehmet Okur for a 2015 second-round pick Not as bad as when Camby was traded for a 2nd rounder. Looks like Utah is shifting into small market mode while they figure out what kind of team they have. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|