It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 6:13 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 3:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Mike D'Antoni: My goal is to get as many shots as possible on offense over the course of a game

Kobe: You're hired.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 20, 2009 3:10 pm
Posts: 9673
Location: Schaumpton
pizza_Place: Piece Pizza and Brewery
I don't understand. They want to win championships so they hire a guy with no track record of being able to do so.

_________________
Team Cutler.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Northside_Dan wrote:
I don't understand. They want to win championships so they hire a guy with no track record of being able to do so.

He came pretty close with some of those Suns teams and he's never had a team as remotely talented as this.

If Phil was asking for too much then I can see why they went this route. Nash and Kobe like him. Problem is that in their first five games this season, they were 6th in points per possession and 23rd in PPP allowed, so it's not like offensive struggles were causing their problems. They'll be a hell of a lot funner to watch now though. Need to get more shooters, preferably a stretch 4, to properly run the SSOL offense though. We'll see.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 30, 2005 11:36 pm
Posts: 19533
I read Phil wanted total control of roster, ability to miss shoot-a-rounds and some away games. He was nuts if he thought he would get that much.

_________________
Frank Coztansa wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
Not over yet.
Yes it is.


CDOM wrote:
When this is all over, which is not going to be for a while, Trump will be re-elected President.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:23 am 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17984
pizza_Place: 6 characters
The Lakers are going to score 200 points a game.

And give up 225.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 9:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Yup...

OKC and San Antonio are still the two best teams in the West.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Lakers are going to have to pay a $30M luxury tax bill. They are not going to pay Phil Jackson $10M-$15M per year to coach 70 games and the playoffs.

As far as the defense goes, its true that D'Antoni does not coach defense. Luckily, Pau and Kobe have pride and already play defense, Howard is a multiple winner of defensive player of the year, and World Peace still likes to lock people down. The only issue is Nash, and he wasn't playing defense with or without Phil Jackson.

The biggest thing to look for here is D'Antoni changing the Lakers from Kobe running the show to Nash running the show. Will Kobe be able to deal with it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:30 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
immessedup17 wrote:
conns7901 wrote:
I read Phil wanted total control of roster, ability to miss shoot-a-rounds and some away games. He was nuts if he thought he would get that much.

This. Phil thinks he has transcended the game, and at that point...you say "no thank you" and go elsewhere. I'm not sure D'Antoni was the answer...but at least he will commit 100% to the team.


Once he is fully recovered from his knee surgery.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Lakers are going to have to pay a $30M luxury tax bill. They are not going to pay Phil Jackson $10M-$15M per year to coach 70 games and the playoffs.

As far as the defense goes, its true that D'Antoni does not coach defense. Luckily, Pau and Kobe have pride and already play defense, Howard is a multiple winner of defensive player of the year, and World Peace still likes to lock people down. The only issue is Nash, and he wasn't playing defense with or without Phil Jackson.

The biggest thing to look for here is D'Antoni changing the Lakers from Kobe running the show to Nash running the show. Will Kobe be able to deal with it?

Kobe has lost a step defensively and really is only slightly above average now and Pau still struggles against 4's that can shoot. The bench is awful defensively and speedy guards will continue to dominate LA. I don't think they'll be a top 10 defensive team.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 10:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
I still think you give Phil whatever he wants if he is interested. He is WORLDS better than D'Antoni. We will see how much love and respect Kobe has for him once the playoffs start.

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
FavreFan wrote:
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Lakers are going to have to pay a $30M luxury tax bill. They are not going to pay Phil Jackson $10M-$15M per year to coach 70 games and the playoffs.

As far as the defense goes, its true that D'Antoni does not coach defense. Luckily, Pau and Kobe have pride and already play defense, Howard is a multiple winner of defensive player of the year, and World Peace still likes to lock people down. The only issue is Nash, and he wasn't playing defense with or without Phil Jackson.

The biggest thing to look for here is D'Antoni changing the Lakers from Kobe running the show to Nash running the show. Will Kobe be able to deal with it?

Kobe has lost a step defensively and really is only slightly above average now and Pau still struggles against 4's that can shoot. The bench is awful defensively and speedy guards will continue to dominate LA. I don't think they'll be a top 10 defensive team.

And Dwight is not all that great a defensive center overall. The DPOY awards he won were due to the blocked shots, which can be an enticing stat on paper, but not necessarily an indicator of how good a defender you are.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 28, 2009 11:10 am
Posts: 42094
Location: Rock Ridge (splendid!)
pizza_Place: Charlie Fox's / Paisano's
RFDC wrote:
I still think you give Phil whatever he wants if he is interested. He is WORLDS better than D'Antoni. We will see how much love and respect Kobe has for him once the playoffs start.


See, there's the thing.

I don't think Phil was all that terribly interested. That does not mean to indicate he never will be interested in coaching again, just he wasn't interested in coaching now. Because of his knee? Because of Dwight Howard? Because he just didn't feel like it? Who knows.

BUT, since he's likely not done with coaching, perhaps he didn't think it would serve him well just to politely decline outright. Rather, he asked for what he figured they'd never give him - and if the actually did give it to him, the marginal value of what he would've received would've likely buffered most of his dislike of returning at the present. AND, it's (arguably) such a silly contract to ask for that it also saves face, for the most part, for the Lakers for not signing Phil ... a sort of synergy that just wouldn't be there for both parties is Phil just said "nah".

Maybe not the preferred narrative currently, but it is a somewhat plausible alternate to the "Phil's full of himself" story making the rounds.

_________________
Power is always in the hands of the masses of men. What oppresses the masses is their own ignorance, their own short-sighted selfishness.
- Henry George


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 11, 2008 4:11 pm
Posts: 57569
Don, all good points, and that very well maybe the case

_________________
"He is a loathsome, offensive brute
--yet I can't look away."


Frank Coztansa wrote:
I have MANY years of experience in trying to appreciate steaming piles of dogshit.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
Jim Buss is a complete idiot. I can't believe his father continues to allow him to make these moves. Phil Jackson WAS going to accept the Lakers offer and essentially wanted the same arrangement he had during his last season. That isn't asking for the moon. Especially considering Phil Jackson is arguably the best coach in the history of professional sports. Money isn't an issue for the Lakers either. Phil would leave in a couple years anyway.

If your goal is the win championships in Kobe's last couple of years you don't hire a guy that has NEVER won a championship. To hire D'Antoni is a slap in the fans face and Kobe's. Jim Buss has routinely acted like a spoiled child and it's going to hurt the franchise.

D'Antoni's offense won't work either. What do you do with Gasol? Where are the shooters? That's on top of the fact that Kobe and Nash are 90 years old and can't runaround the way they used to. Besides scoring wasn't the main issue.

Nothing D'Antoni has showed you in his career tells you he can handle superstar personalities. Look no further than NY for that answer. Nothing D'Antoni has done in his career tells you he knows anything about defense. Phil Jackson would have solved all of these problems and made the Lakers the favorite to win it all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2010 9:09 am
Posts: 19925
pizza_Place: Papa Johns
D'Antoni is the consummate snake oil salesman in the coaching realm.

Flim flam man.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.

I was going to say...this team very much reminds me of the '04 "Superteam" that got trounced by the Pistons. Was Phil coaching them or was that Rudy T?

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.

I was going to say...this team very much reminds me of the '04 "Superteam" that got trounced by the Pistons. Was Phil coaching them or was that Rudy T?


So you are saying they will go to the finals?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:03 pm
Posts: 43743
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.

I was going to say...this team very much reminds me of the '04 "Superteam" that got trounced by the Pistons. Was Phil coaching them or was that Rudy T?

That was Phil's "Last Ride". Rudy T only coached them for about 2-3 months the next season before stepping down for health reasons.

_________________
Juice's Lecture Notes wrote:
I am not a legal expert, how many times do I have to say it?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Makaveli wrote:
Jim Buss is a complete idiot. I can't believe his father continues to allow him to make these moves. Phil Jackson WAS going to accept the Lakers offer and essentially wanted the same arrangement he had during his last season. That isn't asking for the moon. Especially considering Phil Jackson is arguably the best coach in the history of professional sports. Money isn't an issue for the Lakers either. Phil would leave in a couple years anyway.

If your goal is the win championships in Kobe's last couple of years you don't hire a guy that has NEVER won a championship. To hire D'Antoni is a slap in the fans face and Kobe's. Jim Buss has routinely acted like a spoiled child and it's going to hurt the franchise.

D'Antoni's offense won't work either. What do you do with Gasol? Where are the shooters? That's on top of the fact that Kobe and Nash are 90 years old and can't runaround the way they used to. Besides scoring wasn't the main issue.

Nothing D'Antoni has showed you in his career tells you he can handle superstar personalities. Look no further than NY for that answer. Nothing D'Antoni has done in his career tells you he knows anything about defense. Phil Jackson would have solved all of these problems and made the Lakers the favorite to win it all.

Very disappointing hire. I would have probably tried to coax Sloan out of retirement. He also never won a title, but that's more of a casualty of having to face Jordan in the Finals than anything.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.


None of the Lakers "Big 4" have taken a step back like Malone and Payton had. Kobe is still a top 5 to 10 player and Nash and still one of the best pure PG's. Howard is in his prime and Gasol is at the tail end of his.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
Big Chicagoan wrote:
The Original Kid Cairo wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.

I was going to say...this team very much reminds me of the '04 "Superteam" that got trounced by the Pistons. Was Phil coaching them or was that Rudy T?


So you are saying they will go to the finals?

No. Not sure how you could extract that from my statement. I'm just saying that the construction of this team reminds me of how the '03-04 team was put together.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Makaveli wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.


None of the Lakers "Big 4" have taken a step back like Malone and Payton had. Kobe is still a top 5 to 10 player and Nash and still one of the best pure PG's. Howard is in his prime and Gasol is at the tail end of his.

Nash has definitely taken a step back. It's not debatable really. So has Kobe. He might still be a top 10-12 player.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 10:41 am
Posts: 817
pizza_Place: Giordano's
FavreFan wrote:
Makaveli wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.


None of the Lakers "Big 4" have taken a step back like Malone and Payton had. Kobe is still a top 5 to 10 player and Nash and still one of the best pure PG's. Howard is in his prime and Gasol is at the tail end of his.

Nash has definitely taken a step back. It's not debatable really. So has Kobe. He might still be a top 10-12 player.


Malone and Payton were role players then. You can't say that about Nash and you definitely can't say that about Kobe. Therefore the comparison to 2004 really isn't valid. This team is better on paper in just about every way. Phil would have made them the favorites because there isn't a coach that knows how to manage personalities better than him. This team needs that. Kobe can't continue to be a player/coach.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:20 pm 
Offline
1000 CLUB
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:12 pm
Posts: 17984
pizza_Place: 6 characters
Jackson apparently also wanted an ownership stake. No way Buss was gonna allow that.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
Ugueth Will Shiv You wrote:
Jackson apparently also wanted an ownership stake. No way Buss was gonna allow that.


Buss will give up his daughter's pussy, but no ownership stake.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Keeping Score wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Makaveli wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
I disagree that Phil would've put LA as favorites. The talent on the roster is severely overrated because of their collective career accomplishments, similar to when they had four future HOFers in 2004.


None of the Lakers "Big 4" have taken a step back like Malone and Payton had. Kobe is still a top 5 to 10 player and Nash and still one of the best pure PG's. Howard is in his prime and Gasol is at the tail end of his.

Nash has definitely taken a step back. It's not debatable really. So has Kobe. He might still be a top 10-12 player.


If I'm not mistaken, Kobe finished 2nd in scoring last year. I'm pretty sure he's still easily included in any Top 10 list.

If in not mistaken, Kobe took about 5 more shots per game than anyone else in the league last year. He's still got a great mid range game and can score, but his defense, rebounding, and general athleticism have been in obvious decline for two years.

And Nash is a role player now. Hes a very good one, but he's not a top 30 player overall anymore. '04 Shaq AND '04 Kobe are better than anyone on this current team, so the overall talent comparison between the two teams is definitely valid.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:42 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 8:22 am
Posts: 15189
pizza_Place: Wha Happen?
FavreFan wrote:
Northside_Dan wrote:
I don't understand. They want to win championships so they hire a guy with no track record of being able to do so.

He came pretty close with some of those Suns teams and he's never had a team as remotely talented as this.

If Phil was asking for too much then I can see why they went this route. Nash and Kobe like him. Problem is that in their first five games this season, they were 6th in points per possession and 23rd in PPP allowed, so it's not like offensive struggles were causing their problems. They'll be a hell of a lot funner to watch now though. Need to get more shooters, preferably a stretch 4, to properly run the SSOL offense though. We'll see.

I think the Lakers were Finals contenders before, and now they have a good shot to win it all. Nash is pretty much done but on a team with this much talent, he should be able to get by.

_________________
Ба́бушка гада́ла, да на́двое сказа́ла—то ли до́ждик, то ли снег, то ли бу́дет, то ли нет.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72545
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Keeping Score wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
If in not mistaken, Kobe took about 5 more shots per game than anyone else in the league last year. He's still got a great mid range game and can score, but his defense, rebounding, and general athleticism have been in obvious decline for two years.

And Nash is a role player now. Hes a very good one, but he's not a top 30 player overall anymore. '04 Shaq AND '04 Kobe are better than anyone on this current team, so the overall talent comparison between the two teams is definitely valid.


Kobe's defensive decline has been so obvious that he made the All NBA Defensive Team 1st Unit two years ago and 2nd unit last season. In addition to being the 2nd leading scorer in the NBA.

You should know the league well enough by now to know that those defensive teams are done by reputation as much as on-court performance. It's impossible to argue that Kobe is currently a top 5 defensive guard. He's just not.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2012 2:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Apr 06, 2006 12:38 pm
Posts: 39560
Location: Barfagloggle, Indiana
pizza_Place: Pizza Hut
The Lakers are at best, the 3rd best team in the West right now. I just couldn't see them beating SA or OKC in a 7-game series.

_________________
Kid Cairo's Boers & Bernstein YouTube Channel

Kid Cairo: 2013 March Madness Tournament Winner!

"Cowabunga? Cowa fucking piece of dog shit! This game is diarrhea coming out of my dick!"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group