Chicago Fanatics Message Board :: View topic

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper.

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

Nas wrote:

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper.

That's a low fucking bar on both.

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

Nas wrote:

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

No he is not. This why people don't take you seriously. Too much dumb stuff comes out for you to ever be taken seriously. The guy has never been to an all star game and he has played like shit this yr. He has been the biggest free agent disappointment this yr. You kept making excuses for his bad play until it became apparent that he couldn't deliver. I know you will try and hide behind the whole "i'm just trolling" thing, but that is just a convenient cover for bad and idiotic basketball opinions.

Nas wrote:

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

You also thought he was better than Pau Gasol. How that work out for you. Yeah everyone around the NBA really believes that he was instrumental to the Pacers winning record in the playoffs. He was really considered a focal point. Your basketball opinions are getting worse by the day.

In 10 trips to the playoffs his teams have lasted 5 or few games 7 times

His teams were a top 4 seed 5 times

In 66 total playoff games he's shot LESS THAN 42% from the field and 33% from 3.

He shoots the ball over 21 times but averages less than 3 assists.

His teams have been swept 3 times

His teams won only 1 game 4 times

His teams won only 2 games once

His teams advanced 2 times (Even in baseball that's bad)

He shot over 47% once

He shot under 40% 4 times

He shot under 37% 3 times

Under 34% twice

He has shot under 10% from the field in multiple games despite shooting the ball 15+ times

He's won 23 games and lost 43

KDdidit wrote:

Nas wrote:

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper.

That's a low fucking bar on both.

Carmelo Anthony has played at a high level for most of his career. He has far more capital than Lance Stephenson. Lance was everyone's flavor of the month when there were no games played. The funny thing about Lance was that he only became important once Granger was injured. He was never viewed at any point as a key cog to the Pacer machine. He went from NBA no body to emerging all star overnight. Nas and people like him jumped on the bandwagon thinking there was something special and touted him as a future all star. Now that he is flopping he conveniently forgets that.

He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

There is no market for Marshmelo. Teams are calling and lining up to get Stephenson. Teams usually don't like losers.

You truly are a fountain of misinformation.

I'm providing actual facts and statements from coaches, and you just have an axe to grind as usual. Just admit you were wrong about Lance and move on.

Author:	long time guy [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:	Love of Lance
Where are all the Lance Stephenson lovers now. The guy was vastly overrated by members of the CSFMB (Nas you listening) during the summer and now you can barely get a whisper out of them regarding his not so stellar play. You talk about a guy that was counted on to deliver and now has delivered nothing. The book out now is that he is nothing more than a fourth option and an expecting him to become more of a scorer was unrealistic. This summer there was a lot of talk about him being a guy that can get his own shot and a guy that was on the cusp of stardom. Now that he stinks no one wants to talk about him. What gives?

Author:	Nas [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself.

Author:	KDdidit [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. That's a low fucking bar on both.

Author:	long time guy [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:46 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself. No he is not. This why people don't take you seriously. Too much dumb stuff comes out for you to ever be taken seriously. The guy has never been to an all star game and he has played like shit this yr. He has been the biggest free agent disappointment this yr. You kept making excuses for his bad play until it became apparent that he couldn't deliver. I know you will try and hide behind the whole "i'm just trolling" thing, but that is just a convenient cover for bad and idiotic basketball opinions.

Author:	long time guy [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:52 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
KDdidit wrote: Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. That's a low fucking bar on both. Carmelo Anthony has played at a high level for most of his career. He has far more capital than Lance Stephenson. Lance was everyone's flavor of the month when there were no games played. The funny thing about Lance was that he only became important once Granger was injured. He was never viewed at any point as a key cog to the Pacer machine. He went from NBA no body to emerging all star overnight. Nas and people like him jumped on the bandwagon thinking there was something special and touted him as a future all star. Now that he is flopping he conveniently forgets that.

Chicago Fanatics Message Board https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/

Love of Lance https://mail.chicagofanatics.com/viewtopic.php?f=91&t=90909	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Nas [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:55 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
long time guy wrote: Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself. No he is not. This why people don't take you seriously. Too much dumb stuff comes out for you to ever be taken seriously. The guy has never been to an all star game and he has played like shit this yr. He has been the biggest free agent disappointment this yr. You kept making excuses for his bad play until it became apparent that he couldn't deliver. I know you will try and hide behind the whole "i'm just trolling" thing, but that is just a convenient cover for bad and idiotic basketball opinions.

Author:	Nas [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 1:57 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
long time guy wrote: Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself. You also thought he was better than Pau Gasol. How that work out for you. Yeah everyone around the NBA really believes that he was instrumental to the Pacers winning record in the playoffs. He was really considered a focal point. Your basketball opinions are getting worse by the day.

Author:	Nas [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 2:00 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Marshmelo Playoff Facts wrote: In 10 trips to the playoffs his teams have lasted 5 or few games 7 times His teams were a top 4 seed 5 times In 66 total playoff games he's shot LESS THAN 42% from the field and 33% from 3. He shoots the ball over 21 times but averages less than 3 assists. His teams have been swept 3 times His teams won only 1 game 4 times His teams won only 2 games once His teams advanced 2 times (Even in baseball that's bad) He shot over 47% once He shot under 40% 4 times He shot under 37% 3 times Under 34% twice He has shot under 10% from the field in multiple games despite shooting the ball 15+ times He's won 23 games and lost 43

Author:	KDdidit [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 4:39 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
long time guy wrote: KDdidit wrote: Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. That's a low fucking bar on both. Carmelo Anthony has played at a high level for most of his career. He has far more capital than Lance Stephenson. Lance was everyone's flavor of the month when there were no games played. The funny thing about Lance was that he only became important once Granger was injured. He was never viewed at any point as a key cog to the Pacer machine. He went from NBA no body to emerging all star overnight. Nas and people like him jumped on the bandwagon thinking there was something special and touted him as a future all star. Now that he is flopping he conveniently forgets that. U mad?

Author:	Mr. Hernandez [ Fri Dec 12, 2014 6:25 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Lance is good as a 2nd option on a team but nowhere near a main guy for a team. Hes not a leader and can be erratic at times with his olay and behavior. Pair him up with someone like Paul George and he looks better

Author:	long time guy [ Mon Dec 15, 2014 7:09 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Nas wrote: He's better than Marshmelo and cheaper. He's also not a quitter and has a winning playoff record. You're embarrassing yourself. Melo for all the dissing of him still has not been placed on the block. This guy was placed on the block after 23 games. Pathetic. Is it still too early? Just wondering because apparently the Hornets brass obviously does not concur.

Author:	Nas [ Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:43 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
There is no market for Marshmelo. Teams are calling and lining up to get Stephenson. Teams usually don't like losers.

Author:	long time guy [ Mon Dec 15, 2014 9:33 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Nas wrote: There is no market for Marshmelo. Teams are calling and lining up to get Stephenson. Teams usually don't like losers. Melo isn't on the block last I checked. They are looking to pull the plug after 23 games. That is not a good look for your guy no matter how much you want to spin it. Would you still rather have Stephenson over Gasol?

Author:	Bagels [ Tue Dec 16, 2014 8:34 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
long time guy wrote: You truly are a fountain of misinformation.

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/

Author:	long time guy [ Tue Dec 23, 2014 3:00 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
The Charlotte Hornets are on a three game winning streak. All three wins have occurred while Lance Stephenson sits out. If this is not a further indictment of Lance I don't know what is. Hornets are 6-19 with Stephenson in the lineup and 3-0 without him.

Author:	long time guy [ Sun Mar 13, 2016 8:56 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Conspicuously missing from this thread are any comments by one douchebag. Refuses to engage while the career of Lance is floundering but now he just can't seem to get enough of him. Here was your opportunity and you blew it kid.

Author:	Douchebag [ Sun Mar 13, 2016 11:06 am ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
I'm providing actual facts and statements from coaches, and you just have an axe to grind as usual. Just admit you were wrong about Lance and move on.

Author:	long time guy [ Sun Mar 13, 2016 1:53 pm ]
Post subject:	Re: Love of Lance
Douchebag wrote: I'm providing actual facts and statements from coaches, and you just have an axe to grind as usual. Just admit you were wrong about Lance and move on. It's interesting that the names you neglected to mention were that of Doc Rivers and and Steve Clifford guys that were both coaches of Lance. They also were guys that neglected to play his sorry ass. 4 games are now supposed to now outweigh about 140? In which universe does that occur? Oh the irony in "just move on". Is that what you are doing? It seems like you were waiting for an "aha" moment. This battle was won a long time ago. Even then biggest of Lance supporters laid down theor weapons months ago. You're merely "whistling past the graveyard" right about now.