FavreFan wrote:
Darkside wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
So applying that logic to a season means batting .159 > batting .300
Maybe. What if you bat .159 and all 60 of your hits are home runs and you got 110 RBI vs. .300 and they're all little punch and judy singles with 65 RBI? Who had a better season?
And
@ you for using batting average man. C'mon.
I thought it was an obvious shot at Dunn's pathetic season last year. Obviously it wasn't a perfect comparison but i think it showed the silliness of using the "rarity" angle when talking about how impressive something is. I don't really think its debatable that a perfect game is more impressive than 3 sac flys in a game.
I don't think the "rarity" angle is really all that silly.
Look man, the whole thing is wording. A pitcher that k's 20 could very well be more dominant than a pitcher that got that perfect game depending on how the games go down. Its like saying, what's more impressive, building a 600hp sports car or designing a new ultralight airplane. They're different things. A 20 K game and a perfect game really shouldn't be directly compared.
_________________
"Play until it hurts, then play until it hurts to not play."http://soundcloud.com/darkside124 HOF 2013, MM Champion 2014
bigfan wrote:
Many that is true, but an incomplete statement.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
