Frank Coztansa wrote:
NL Wins, Byrd is made out to be some sort of MVP, and its the lowest rated game ever. Not a coincidence.
With the All-Star game being the lowest rated ever, I was wondering why some of you think that is and how much should baseball be worried?
I was listening to the ESPN guys talk about this, suprised they talked about it, they usually try to save baseball when they can, but one of their reasons was a lack of stars, which I found suprising since the game had Pujols, Mauer, Jeter, and some others. I can't see not having Stephen Strausburg there or even Heyward from the Braves not playing hurt the rating, would 1 or both of those guys brought 3 million more viewers, Strausburg would have brought more in, but probably not much more. Could the stars be because baseball doesn't promote their players well, some people think Pujols may be the best player and he was there, but people still didn't watch. Is baseball worried about promoting a star in case they find out he's dirty.
On to how worried should baseball be, on Pardon the Interuption, Wilbon said he didn't mean much, but Bob Ryan was on their and said Bud Selig should be embarassed because more people watched the game that always get ripped in the NFL's Pro Bowl than this game. I think baseball should be a little worried, they were going against few sports Tuesday, ratings haven't been good for their Saturday games on Fox and right now the top NL playoff team that may bring people in would be the Braves.
What could be a problem for baseball is they cleanup the game and power numbers go down, people don't watch the games, steroids get involved and people watch. I just wonder the way it's going for baseball, what's going to look like in about 10 years, I just wonder if Fox will ever leave and you see more baseball on TBS.