It is currently Thu Nov 21, 2024 2:04 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:10 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
rogers park bryan wrote:
This will definitely change with the next CBA and JORR is right about how steroids affected this. Interesting side effect of the PED Era many people don't think about.



And a corollary to this is teams artificially holding an MLB quality player in the minors just to control him for an extra year. As we can see in this era of tighter drug policy, there's no reason to believe that a guy's 21 or 22 year old season will be less valuable than his 27 or 28 year old season. You had about a twenty year period where it was tough for a 21 year old to break in because his position was manned by a 34 year old All-Star. That isn't happening without super-juice. It would be pretty silly to waste the 20 year old season of Mel Ott, Bob Feller, or Al Kaline in Podunk, Kansas because you're worried about his salary six or seven years down the road.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
In MLB he gets the whole 32 even if he never plays another game. That is why this is a ridiculous argument.
That's the problem. You are assuming that the player would get the EXACT same contract with guaranteed money through the length of the deal. Burton has in effect a 2 year/$22 million deal. He would have to be really bad to not get the third year which gets him up to $25 million over 3 years.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
rogers park bryan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
FavreFan wrote:
Literally no professional athlete in the country would agree with this. It's easy to cherry pick the best player in the league who just signed the richest contract on defense in history as a counter example but in the vast majority of cases the fully guaranteed contracts make a huge difference.
Kyler Murray may agree.

I'm not cherry picking anything. Let's take a guy like Trey Burton. He signed a 4 year deal with $22 million guaranteed out of the $32 million total. If he gets cut after 2 years, he gets $22 million as he is owed $3.5 million extra if he is cut right then. After that, he basically has 2 team options paying him about $7 million per year.

So yeah, there is a chance that he gets cut in year 2 or 3 and loses out on that extra $10 million for two more years of playing, or $7 million for one more year of playing but we also have to assume that the contract would have been for the same value and also guaranteed which is unlikely. It is a league with a salary cap that determines the total amount of salary available to pay players. It's not like there is a huge amount of unspent money that would suddenly be unlocked. That is why they are structured as they are. You get your guaranteed money that can't be taken from you, and a set number of years on that. It's then basically you are on one year deals after that. If teams had to budget out with no flexibility like that they would have to adjust accordingly.

In MLB he gets the whole 32 even if he never plays another game. That is why this is a ridiculous argument.

Correct. I applaud Rick's effort but you can tell he's bored and doesn't feel like jumping into the Politics muck for a debate :lol:

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
In MLB he gets the whole 32 even if he never plays another game. That is why this is a ridiculous argument.
That's the problem. You are assuming that the player would get the EXACT same contract with guaranteed money through the length of the deal. Burton has in effect a 2 year/$22 million deal. He would have to be really bad to not get the third year which gets him up to $25 million over 3 years.

This is an insane argument, Im tapping out.

I maintain that gettting 32 million is better than getting significantly less than that.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:15 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?



40 and 58. What's your point?

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Kirkwood wrote:
Players really goofed up their current deal.

- 6-7 years under essentially defined earnings schedules during prime years
- implementation of a luxury-tax.
- no implementation of salary floors for franchises or rules about pocketing revenue sharing.


This is a good point and a big deal. But floors can hurt in ways as well.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Keyser Soze wrote:
The dickbag owners are killing it.

Image


Cmon Keyser, you know the Yanks are one of the few outliers.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:23 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 21, 2010 5:02 pm
Posts: 11735
pizza_Place: Angelo's Pizza in Downers Grove
pittmike wrote:
Keyser Soze wrote:
The dickbag owners are killing it.

Image


Cmon Keyser, you know the Yanks are one of the few outliers.


Keyser also think the only costs the Yankees have is payroll.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:30 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Aug 02, 2006 5:15 pm
Posts: 16923
pittmike wrote:
Cmon Keyser, you know the Yanks are one of the few outliers.


Nope

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Correct. I applaud Rick's effort but you can tell he's bored and doesn't feel like jumping into the Politics muck for a debate :lol:

Are you guys truly not understanding this? NFL players get their money up front. The concept of a guaranteed contract doesn't mean much. Here is another example. Let's look at the Kirk Cousins deal which was fully guaranteed.

It was undoubtedly a bad deal but it is the best we have.
3 years at $84 million. He gets $28 million per year.
Year 1: $26 million
Year 2: $54 million
Year 3: $84 million
The last big money deal was Matt Stafford.
He signed a 5 year deal, with $92 million guaranteed. This was an extension so Year 1
Year 0: $51 million(this was the last year of his previous deal, but he got his signing bonus here)
Year 1: $67.5 million
Year 2: $87 million
Year 3: $108 million
It is at this point that the Lions could cut him, but as you can see he would have made far more than Cousins at this point.
If they don't cut him,
Year 4: $128 million
Year 5: $151 million

As you can see, the guaranteed value at the start of it is all that really matters. What Cousins really did was not give the team a chance to keep him on a competitive value for an extra couple years but he actually will make less than Cousins throughout the contract with the only chance being that in year 4 Cousins gets another massive deal, and in that case Stafford would probably also be in line for a big extension similar to how Brees and others keep on getting new deals after the guaranteed money is gone.

That doesn't even get into the fact that Stafford got a check for $50 million when he signed, and Cousins didn't.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?



40 and 58. What's your point?
How are you getting to those numbers?

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I maintain that gettting 32 million is better than getting significantly less than that.
See how Matt Stafford, for 3 years, is actually going to get more money than the fully guaranteed money of Kirk Cousins, and Stafford signed a year before Cousins.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:36 am 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?



40 and 58. What's your point?
How are you getting to those numbers?



Those are the numbers.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I maintain that gettting 32 million is better than getting significantly less than that.
See how Matt Stafford, for 3 years, is actually going to get more money than the fully guaranteed money of Kirk Cousins, and Stafford signed a year before Cousins.

See how every MLB player gets every penny of the money he signs for 100% of the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I maintain that gettting 32 million is better than getting significantly less than that.
See how Matt Stafford, for 3 years, is actually going to get more money than the fully guaranteed money of Kirk Cousins, and Stafford signed a year before Cousins.

lol.

Yes, but Cousins then gets to sign another guaranteed contract while Stafford has to hope for an extension he probably won't be getting.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
Keyser Soze wrote:
pittmike wrote:
Cmon Keyser, you know the Yanks are one of the few outliers.


Nope

Image


No I am correct I said "few" of the outliers.

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?



40 and 58. What's your point?
How are you getting to those numbers?



Those are the numbers.
I don't think we should count inactives in either but I don't even know what point you are arguing anyways. The number also should be 63, not 58 I believe.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 11:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
FavreFan wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I maintain that gettting 32 million is better than getting significantly less than that.
See how Matt Stafford, for 3 years, is actually going to get more money than the fully guaranteed money of Kirk Cousins, and Stafford signed a year before Cousins.

lol.

Yes, but Cousins then gets to sign another guaranteed contract while Stafford has to hope for an extension he probably won't be getting.
If both are performing at a high level then each will get a big contract/extension around that time. To take it a step further, the only way he isn't getting around $20 million a year is if the Lions cut him then, which he would be in the same position as Cousins.

That doesn't really matter though. The whole point is that Stafford will make MORE money than Cousins did on his 3 year deal over those 3 years, and he also got the money much faster. That is why I'm saying it is overrated. It's not like Stafford lost out on anything in taking a deal with more guaranteed money but not the complete contract.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:00 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
IMU wrote:
The average MLB annual salary is more than 2x the average NFL salary.
How many players on a baseball team? How many players on a football team?



40 and 58. What's your point?
How are you getting to those numbers?



Those are the numbers.
I don't think we should count inactives in either but I don't even know what point you are arguing anyways. The number also should be 63, not 58 I believe.



I'm not arguing anything. I'm trying to figure out what your point is.

I believe there are 53 players on an NFL team plus a 5 man reserve squad. There are definitely 40 men on a major league roster.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
I'm not arguing anything. I'm trying to figure out what your point is.

I believe there are 53 players on an NFL team plus a 5 man reserve squad. There are definitely 40 men on a major league roster.
The practice squad is 10 players. It can sometimes be 11 players.

Also, it should be pointed out that the MLB union uses average salary numbers for the 25 man rosters. If we are talking about average salary, it almost certainly is using 53 for the NFL and 25 for MLB.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
I have two offers for you Rick

Offer #1: 10 million dollars, right now, no questions asked


Offer#2: 1 million dollars right now, with the chance to make as much as 10 million if you perform well enough


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 4:29 pm
Posts: 40641
Location: Everywhere
pizza_Place: giordanos
rogers park bryan wrote:
I have two offers for you Rick

Offer #1: 10 million dollars, right now, no questions asked


Offer#2: 1 million dollars right now, with the chance to make as much as 10 million if you perform well enough


Hey Scorehead, you might want to put a disclaimer in there. :lol:

_________________
Elections have consequences.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
pittmike wrote:
rogers park bryan wrote:
I have two offers for you Rick

Offer #1: 10 million dollars, right now, no questions asked


Offer#2: 1 million dollars right now, with the chance to make as much as 10 million if you perform well enough


Hey Scorehead, you might want to put a disclaimer in there. :lol:

:lol: :lol: :lol:


Withdrawn! Withdrawn!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
rogers park bryan wrote:
I have two offers for you Rick

Offer #1: 10 million dollars, right now, no questions asked


Offer#2: 1 million dollars right now, with the chance to make as much as 10 million if you perform well enough
It's clear you aren't even trying to understand the point.

Of course an equal contract is better when fully guaranteed. The problem is that it makes no sense to think the contract wouldn't change. Going back to my last example, Matt Stafford signed a 5 year, $135 million dollar contract with $92 million guaranteed for the first 3 years(with $20 million, and then $23 million coming the two last years). Kirk Cousins signed a 3 year, $84 million dollar contract. At the end of year 3, Stafford will make $8 million more and he got $50 million right away and Cousins got $3 million right away. If Stafford is cut after year 3, he makes MORE money than Cousins did. If he isn't cut, he makes another $20 million, and then another $23 million if he isn't cut the year after that.

Right now, if you were an agent for a quarterback, and both those deals were offered to you which one do you take? I think it's fairly obvious that Stafford's contract was much better.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:19 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Matt Stafford signed a 5 year, $135 million dollar contract with $92 million guaranteed for the first 3 years(with $20 million, and then $23 million coming the two last year).


That's a management-centric way to describe that contract. It's actually a a 3-year $92 million contract with team options for two additional years.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 12:16 pm
Posts: 81625
Boilermaker Rick wrote:

Of course an equal contract is better when fully guaranteed.

That's all I'm saying, brother man

Glad we agree.


Last edited by rogers park bryan on Thu Jan 10, 2019 1:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 6:57 pm
Posts: 92034
Location: To the left of my post
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Matt Stafford signed a 5 year, $135 million dollar contract with $92 million guaranteed for the first 3 years(with $20 million, and then $23 million coming the two last year).


That's a management-centric way to describe that contract. It's actually a a 3-year $92 million contract with team options for two additional years.

Sure. That's fine. That's why I'm saying that the concept of NFL contract not being fully guaranteed is overrated.

The worst case scenario in any non-guaranteed contract is either a catastrophic injury or such a decline in play that you never get anything but a very low next contract. If that happens to both players, Stafford came out ahead of Cousins by a good margin.

In fact, Alex Smith is a great example here. He signed a 4 year, $94 million contract with $71 million guaranteed. It really was a 3 year, $71 million contract. This was the guy who isn't nearly as good who was signed to replace Cousins in Washington. Even if he never plays again, he is getting $71 million over these 3 years. Not bad for a contract that isn't guaranteed.

_________________
You do not talk to me like that! I work too hard to deal with this stuff! I work too hard! I'm an important member of the CSFMB! I drive a Dodge Stratus!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:31 pm 
Offline
Site Admin
User avatar

Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2010 10:00 am
Posts: 79534
Location: Ravenswood Manor
pizza_Place: Pete's
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Matt Stafford signed a 5 year, $135 million dollar contract with $92 million guaranteed for the first 3 years(with $20 million, and then $23 million coming the two last year).


That's a management-centric way to describe that contract. It's actually a a 3-year $92 million contract with team options for two additional years.

Sure. That's fine. That's why I'm saying that the concept of NFL contract not being fully guaranteed is overrated.

The worst case scenario in any non-guaranteed contract is either a catastrophic injury or such a decline in play that you never get anything but a very low next contract. If that happens to both players, Stafford came out ahead of Cousins by a good margin.

In fact, Alex Smith is a great example here. He signed a 4 year, $94 million contract with $71 million guaranteed. It really was a 3 year, $71 million contract. This was the guy who isn't nearly as good who was signed to replace Cousins in Washington. Even if he never plays again, he is getting $71 million over these 3 years. Not bad for a contract that isn't guaranteed.


Right, but your point isn't really to compare Stafford's deal to Cousins's, is it? The point is, a baseball player that was equivalent to Stafford would receive the full 5 years guaranteed. Why don't you compare Stafford's deal to Jason Heyward's? And we won't even consider that Stafford's brain is being destroyed in return for his millions.

_________________
Anybody here seen my old friend Bobby?
Can you tell me where he's gone?
I thought I saw him walkin' up to The Hill
With Elon, Tulsi, and Don


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Collusion
PostPosted: Thu Jan 10, 2019 12:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2007 11:17 am
Posts: 72380
Location: Palatine
pizza_Place: Lou Malnatis
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Joe Orr Road Rod wrote:
Boilermaker Rick wrote:
Matt Stafford signed a 5 year, $135 million dollar contract with $92 million guaranteed for the first 3 years(with $20 million, and then $23 million coming the two last year).


That's a management-centric way to describe that contract. It's actually a a 3-year $92 million contract with team options for two additional years.

Sure. That's fine. That's why I'm saying that the concept of NFL contract not being fully guaranteed is overrated.

The worst case scenario in any non-guaranteed contract is either a catastrophic injury or such a decline in play that you never get anything but a very low next contract. If that happens to both players, Stafford came out ahead of Cousins by a good margin.

In fact, Alex Smith is a great example here. He signed a 4 year, $94 million contract with $71 million guaranteed. It really was a 3 year, $71 million contract. This was the guy who isn't nearly as good who was signed to replace Cousins in Washington. Even if he never plays again, he is getting $71 million over these 3 years. Not bad for a contract that isn't guaranteed.


Right, but your point isn't really to compare Stafford's deal to Cousins's, is it? The point is, a baseball player that was equivalent to Stafford would receive the full 5 years guaranteed. Why don't you compare Stafford's deal to Jason Heyward's? And we won't even consider that Stafford's brain is being destroyed in return for his millions.

I saw Stafford's draft day interview. Negligible losses on that last point.

_________________
Fare you well, fare you well
I love you more than words can tell
Listen to the river sing sweet songs
To rock my soul


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 196 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 7  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group